Alessandro Picelli1, Camilla Melotti1, Francesca Origano1, Roberta Neri1, Elisa Verzè1, Marialuisa Gandolfi2, Andreas Waldner3, Nicola Smania4. 1. Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 2. Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre, University of Verona, Verona, Italy Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy. 3. Villa Melitta Rehabilitation Clinic, Bolzano, Italy. 4. Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Centre, University of Verona, Verona, Italy Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy nicola.smania@univr.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The main aim was to compare robotic gait training vs. balance training for reducing postural instability in patients with Parkinson's disease. The secondary aim was to compare their effects on the level of confidence during activities of daily living requiring balance, functional mobility and severity of disease. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING:University hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 66 patients with Parkinson's disease at Hoehn and Yahr Stage 3. INTERVENTION: After balanced randomization, all patients received 12, 45-minute treatment sessions, three days a week, for four consecutive weeks. A group underwent robot-assisted gait training with progressive gait speed increasing and body-weight support decreasing. The other group underwent balance training aimed at improving postural reactions (self and externally induced destabilization, coordination, locomotor dexterity exercises). MAIN MEASURES: Patients were evaluated before, after and one month posttreatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Berg Balance Scale. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale; Timed Up and Go Test; Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the groups for the Berg Balance Scale either immediately after intervention (mean score in the robotic training group 51.58 ±3.94; mean score in the balance training group 51.15 ±3.46), or one-month follow-up (mean score in the robotic training group 51.03 ±4.63; mean score in the balance training group 50.97 ±4.28). Similar results were found for all the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that robotic gait training is not superior to balance training for improving postural instability in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The main aim was to compare robotic gait training vs. balance training for reducing postural instability in patients with Parkinson's disease. The secondary aim was to compare their effects on the level of confidence during activities of daily living requiring balance, functional mobility and severity of disease. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 66 patients with Parkinson's disease at Hoehn and Yahr Stage 3. INTERVENTION: After balanced randomization, all patients received 12, 45-minute treatment sessions, three days a week, for four consecutive weeks. A group underwent robot-assisted gait training with progressive gait speed increasing and body-weight support decreasing. The other group underwent balance training aimed at improving postural reactions (self and externally induced destabilization, coordination, locomotor dexterity exercises). MAIN MEASURES: Patients were evaluated before, after and one month posttreatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Berg Balance Scale. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale; Timed Up and Go Test; Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the groups for the Berg Balance Scale either immediately after intervention (mean score in the robotic training group 51.58 ±3.94; mean score in the balance training group 51.15 ±3.46), or one-month follow-up (mean score in the robotic training group 51.03 ±4.63; mean score in the balance training group 50.97 ±4.28). Similar results were found for all the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that robotic gait training is not superior to balance training for improving postural instability in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease.
Authors: Jacqueline A Osborne; Rachel Botkin; Cristina Colon-Semenza; Tamara R DeAngelis; Oscar G Gallardo; Heidi Kosakowski; Justin Martello; Sujata Pradhan; Miriam Rafferty; Janet L Readinger; Abigail L Whitt; Terry D Ellis Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Hassan Mohammadi-Abdar; Angela L Ridgel; Fred M Discenzo; Kenneth A Loparo Journal: IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 5.303
Authors: Seo Jung Yun; Hyun Haeng Lee; Woo Hyung Lee; Seung Hak Lee; Byung-Mo Oh; Han Gil Seo Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Jule Bessler; Gerdienke B Prange-Lasonder; Robert V Schulte; Leendert Schaake; Erik C Prinsen; Jaap H Buurke Journal: Front Robot AI Date: 2020-11-16
Authors: Marios Spanakis; Ioanna Xylouri; Evridiki Patelarou; Athina Patelarou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 4.614