Ilse C S Swinkels1, Margit K Kooijman2, Peter M Spreeuwenberg3, Daniël Bossen4, Chantal J Leemrijse5, Christel E van Dijk6, Robert Verheij7, Dinny H de Bakker8, Cindy Veenhof9. 1. I.C.S. Swinkels, PhD, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands. i.swinkels@nivel.nl. 2. M.K. Kooijman, PT, MSc, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. 3. P.M. Spreeuwenberg, MA, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. 4. D. Bossen, PT, PhD, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. 5. C.J. Leemrijse, PT, PhD, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. 6. C.E. van Dijk, PhD, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. 7. R. Verheij, PhD, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research. 8. D.H. de Bakker, PhD, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research; and TRANZO (Tilburg University, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare), Tilburg, the Netherlands. 9. C. Veenhof, PT, PhD, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-referral for physical therapy was introduced in 2006 in the Netherlands. Internationally, debate on self-referral is still ongoing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of self-referral for physical therapy in the Netherlands, focusing on volume of general practice and physical therapy care (incidence rates and utilization of services). DESIGN: The study was based on monitoring data from existing data sources. METHODS: Longitudinal electronic medical record data from general practitioners (GPs) and physical therapists participating in the NIVEL Primary Care Database were used, as well as public data from Statistics Netherlands. Descriptive statistics and Poisson multilevel regression analyses were used for analyzing the data. RESULTS: Incidence rates of back (including low back), shoulder, and neck pain in general practice declined slightly from 2004 to 2009. No linear trends were found for number of contacts in GP care for back (including low back) and neck pain. The number of patients visiting physical therapists and the proportion of self-referrers are growing. Self-referrers receive treatment less often after initial intake than referred patients, and the mean number of visits is lower. LIMITATIONS: This study was based on data of various patient populations from existing data sources. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that self-referral in the Netherlands has fulfilled most expectations held prior to its introduction, although no changes to the workload of GP care have been found. Use of physical therapy grew, but due to population aging and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, it remains unclear whether self-referral affects health care utilization. Therefore, cost-benefit analyses are recommended.
BACKGROUND: Self-referral for physical therapy was introduced in 2006 in the Netherlands. Internationally, debate on self-referral is still ongoing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of self-referral for physical therapy in the Netherlands, focusing on volume of general practice and physical therapy care (incidence rates and utilization of services). DESIGN: The study was based on monitoring data from existing data sources. METHODS: Longitudinal electronic medical record data from general practitioners (GPs) and physical therapists participating in the NIVEL Primary Care Database were used, as well as public data from Statistics Netherlands. Descriptive statistics and Poisson multilevel regression analyses were used for analyzing the data. RESULTS: Incidence rates of back (including low back), shoulder, and neck pain in general practice declined slightly from 2004 to 2009. No linear trends were found for number of contacts in GP care for back (including low back) and neck pain. The number of patients visiting physical therapists and the proportion of self-referrers are growing. Self-referrers receive treatment less often after initial intake than referred patients, and the mean number of visits is lower. LIMITATIONS: This study was based on data of various patient populations from existing data sources. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that self-referral in the Netherlands has fulfilled most expectations held prior to its introduction, although no changes to the workload of GP care have been found. Use of physical therapy grew, but due to population aging and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, it remains unclear whether self-referral affects health care utilization. Therefore, cost-benefit analyses are recommended.
Authors: Di-Janne J A Barten; Llse C S Swinkels; Sara A Dorsman; Joost Dekker; Cindy Veenhof; Dinny H de Bakker Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Elisah Margretha Buining; Margit K Kooijman; Ilse C S Swinkels; Martijn F Pisters; Cindy Veenhof Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: M Schreijenberg; P A J Luijsterburg; Y D M Van Trier; D Rizopoulos; M A Koopmanschap; L Voogt; C G Maher; B W Koes Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Rob Goodwin; Fiona Moffatt; Paul Hendrick; Stephen Timmons; Neil Chadborn; Pip Logan Journal: Physiotherapy Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 3.358