Janine Büchel1, Maria Bartosova2, Gwendolyn Eich2, Timo Wittenberger3, Ludger Klein-Hitpass4, Sonja Steppan1, Thilo Hackert5, Franz Schaefer2, Jutta Passlick-Deetjen6, Claus P Schmitt2. 1. Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany. 2. University Hospital for Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Genedata GmbH, Munich, Germany. 4. University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Cell Biology, Essen, Germany. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. Division of Nephrology, University of Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDF) differ with respect to osmotic and buffer compound, and pH and glucose degradation products (GDP) content. The impact on peritoneal membrane integrity is still insufficiently described. We assessed global genomic effects of PDF in primary human peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMC) by whole genome analyses, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and functional measurements. METHODS: PMC isolated from omentum of non-uremic patients were incubated with conventional single chamber PDF (CPDF), lactate- (LPDF), bicarbonate- (BPDF) and bicarbonate/lactate-buffered double-chamber PDF (BLPDF), icodextrin (IPDF) and amino acid PDF (APDF), diluted 1:1 with medium. Affymetrix GeneChip U133Plus2.0 (Affymetrix, CA, USA) and quantitative RT-PCR were applied; cell viability was assessed by proliferation assays. RESULTS: The number of differentially expressed genes compared to medium was 464 with APDF, 208 with CPDF, 169 with IPDF, 71 with LPDF, 45 with BPDF and 42 with BLPDF. Out of these genes 74%, 73%, 79%, 72%, 47% and 57% were downregulated. Gene Ontology (GO) term annotations mainly revealed associations with cell cycle (p = 10(-35)), cell division, mitosis, and DNA replication. One hundred and eighteen out of 249 probe sets detecting genes involved in cell cycle/division were suppressed, with APDF-treated PMC being affected the most regarding absolute number and degree, followed by CPDF and IPDF. Bicarbonate-containing PDF and BLPDF-treated PMC were affected the least. Quantitative RT-PCR measurements confirmed microarray findings for key cell cycle genes (CDK1/CCNB1/CCNE2/AURKA/KIF11/KIF14). Suppression was lowest for BPDF and BLPDF, they upregulated CCNE2 and SMC4. All PDF upregulated 3 out of 4 assessed cell cycle repressors (p53/BAX/p21). Cell viability scores confirmed gene expression results, being 79% of medium for LPDF, 101% for BLPDF, 51% for CPDF and 23% for IPDF. Amino acid-containing PDF (84%) incubated cells were as viable as BPDF (86%). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PD solutions substantially differ with regard to their gene regulating profile and impact on vital functions of PMC, i.e. on cells known to be essential for peritoneal membrane homeostasis.
INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDF) differ with respect to osmotic and buffer compound, and pH and glucose degradation products (GDP) content. The impact on peritoneal membrane integrity is still insufficiently described. We assessed global genomic effects of PDF in primary human peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMC) by whole genome analyses, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and functional measurements. METHODS: PMC isolated from omentum of non-uremic patients were incubated with conventional single chamber PDF (CPDF), lactate- (LPDF), bicarbonate- (BPDF) and bicarbonate/lactate-buffered double-chamber PDF (BLPDF), icodextrin (IPDF) and amino acid PDF (APDF), diluted 1:1 with medium. Affymetrix GeneChip U133Plus2.0 (Affymetrix, CA, USA) and quantitative RT-PCR were applied; cell viability was assessed by proliferation assays. RESULTS: The number of differentially expressed genes compared to medium was 464 with APDF, 208 with CPDF, 169 with IPDF, 71 with LPDF, 45 with BPDF and 42 with BLPDF. Out of these genes 74%, 73%, 79%, 72%, 47% and 57% were downregulated. Gene Ontology (GO) term annotations mainly revealed associations with cell cycle (p = 10(-35)), cell division, mitosis, and DNA replication. One hundred and eighteen out of 249 probe sets detecting genes involved in cell cycle/division were suppressed, with APDF-treated PMC being affected the most regarding absolute number and degree, followed by CPDF and IPDF. Bicarbonate-containing PDF and BLPDF-treated PMC were affected the least. Quantitative RT-PCR measurements confirmed microarray findings for key cell cycle genes (CDK1/CCNB1/CCNE2/AURKA/KIF11/KIF14). Suppression was lowest for BPDF and BLPDF, they upregulated CCNE2 and SMC4. All PDF upregulated 3 out of 4 assessed cell cycle repressors (p53/BAX/p21). Cell viability scores confirmed gene expression results, being 79% of medium for LPDF, 101% for BLPDF, 51% for CPDF and 23% for IPDF. Amino acid-containing PDF (84%) incubated cells were as viable as BPDF (86%). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, PD solutions substantially differ with regard to their gene regulating profile and impact on vital functions of PMC, i.e. on cells known to be essential for peritoneal membrane homeostasis.
Authors: María Auxiliadora Bajo; María Luisa Pérez-Lozano; Patricia Albar-Vizcaino; Gloria del Peso; María-José Castro; Guadalupe Gonzalez-Mateo; Antonio Fernández-Perpén; Abelardo Aguilera; Rafael Sánchez-Villanueva; J Antonio Sánchez-Tomero; Manuel López-Cabrera; Mirjam E Peter; Jutta Passlick-Deetjen; Rafael Selgas Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Rafael Selgas; Auxiliadora Bajo; José A Jiménez-Heffernan; Jose A Sánchez-Tomero; Gloria Del Peso; Abelardo Aguilera; Manuel López-Cabrera Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Janusz Witowski; Katarzyna Korybalska; Justyna Wisniewska; Andrzej Breborowicz; Gerhard M Gahl; Ulrich Frei; Jutta Passlick-Deetjen; Achim Jörres Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Claus Peter Schmitt; Barbara Nau; Gita Gemulla; Klaus E Bonzel; Tuula Hölttä; Sara Testa; Michel Fischbach; Ulrike John; Markus J Kemper; Anja Sander; Klaus Arbeiter; Franz Schaefer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Anna S Nikonova; Igor Astsaturov; Ilya G Serebriiskii; Roland L Dunbrack; Erica A Golemis Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Lara Wohlbold; Karl A Merrick; Saurav De; Ramon Amat; Jun Hyun Kim; Stéphane Larochelle; Jasmina J Allen; Chao Zhang; Kevan M Shokat; John H J Petrini; Robert P Fisher Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Gwendolyn Eich; Maria Bartosova; Christian Tischer; Tanja Tamara Wlodkowski; Betti Schaefer; Sebastian Pichl; Nicole Kraewer; Bruno Ranchin; Karel Vondrak; Max Christoph Liebau; Thilo Hackert; Claus Peter Schmitt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Juan Manuel Sacnun; Robin Hoogenboom; Fabian Eibensteiner; Isabel J Sobieszek; Markus Unterwurzacher; Anja Wagner; Rebecca Herzog; Klaus Kratochwill Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-07-20 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Iva Marinovic; Maria Bartosova; Rebecca Herzog; Juan Manuel Sacnun; Conghui Zhang; Robin Hoogenboom; Markus Unterwurzacher; Thilo Hackert; Aurelio A Teleman; Klaus Kratochwill; Claus Peter Schmitt Journal: Cells Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 7.666