Allison Shorten1, Brett Shorten2. 1. Yale University School of Nursing, USA. Electronic address: allison.shorten@yale.edu. 2. Freelance Data Analyst and Research Consultant, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To help identify the optimal timing for provision of pregnancy decision-aids, this paper examines temporal patterns in women's preference for mode of birth after previous cesarean, prior to a decision-aid intervention. METHODS:Pregnant women (n=212) with one prior cesarean responded to surveys regarding their preference for elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) or trial of labor (TOL) at 12-18 weeks and again at 28 weeks gestation. Patterns of adherence or change in preference were examined. RESULTS: Women's preferences for birth were not set in early pregnancy. There was evidence of increasing uncertainty about preferred mode of birth during the first two trimesters of pregnancy (McNemar value=4.41, p=0.04), decrease in preference for TOL (McNemar value=3.79, p=0.05) and stability in preference for ERCD (McNemar value=0.31, p=0.58). Adherence to early pregnancy choice was associated with previous birth experience, maternal country of birth, emotional state and hospital site. CONCLUSION: Women's growing uncertainty about mode of birth prior to 28 weeks indicates potential readiness for a decision-aid earlier in pregnancy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pregnancy decision-aids affecting mode of birth could be provided early in pregnancy to increase women's opportunity to improve knowledge, clarify personal values and reduce decision uncertainty.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To help identify the optimal timing for provision of pregnancy decision-aids, this paper examines temporal patterns in women's preference for mode of birth after previous cesarean, prior to a decision-aid intervention. METHODS: Pregnant women (n=212) with one prior cesarean responded to surveys regarding their preference for elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) or trial of labor (TOL) at 12-18 weeks and again at 28 weeks gestation. Patterns of adherence or change in preference were examined. RESULTS:Women's preferences for birth were not set in early pregnancy. There was evidence of increasing uncertainty about preferred mode of birth during the first two trimesters of pregnancy (McNemar value=4.41, p=0.04), decrease in preference for TOL (McNemar value=3.79, p=0.05) and stability in preference for ERCD (McNemar value=0.31, p=0.58). Adherence to early pregnancy choice was associated with previous birth experience, maternal country of birth, emotional state and hospital site. CONCLUSION:Women's growing uncertainty about mode of birth prior to 28 weeks indicates potential readiness for a decision-aid earlier in pregnancy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pregnancy decision-aids affecting mode of birth could be provided early in pregnancy to increase women's opportunity to improve knowledge, clarify personal values and reduce decision uncertainty.
Authors: Rebecca Whybrow; Louise M Webster; Paul T Seed; Jane Sandall; Lucy C Chappell Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Patryk Rudzinski; Inga Lopuszynska; Katarzyna Pieniak; Daria Stelmach; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.614