Literature DB >> 25081978

A protective effect after clearance of orthotopic rat hepatocellular carcinoma by nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Ru Chen1, Nova M Sain2, K Tyler Harlow2, Yeong-Jer Chen2, Peter K Shires3, Richard Heller2, Stephen J Beebe4.   

Abstract

Strategies for treating liver cancer using radiation, chemotherapy combinations and tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting specific mutations have provided longer survival times, yet multiple treatments are often needed and recurrences with new malignant phenotypes are not uncommon. New and innovative treatments are undoubtedly needed to successfully treat liver cancer. Over the last decade, nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) have shown promise in pre-clinical studies; however, these have been limited to treatment of skin cancers or xenographs in mice. In the present report, an orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) model is established in rats using N1-S1 HCC cells. Data demonstrate a response rate of 80-90% when 1000 pulses are delivered with 100ns durations, electric field strengths of 50kV/cm and repetition rates of 1Hz. N1-S1 tumours treated with nsPEFs expressed significant number of cells with active caspase-3 and caspase-9, but not caspase-8, indicating an intrinsic apoptosis mechanism(s) as well as caspase-independent mechanisms. Most remarkably, rats with successfully ablated tumours failed to re-grow tumours when challenged with a second injection of N1-S1 cells when implanted in the same or different liver lobe that harboured the original tumour. Given this protective effect, infiltration of immune cells and the presence of granzyme B expressing cells within days of treatment suggest the possibility of an anti-tumour adaptive immune response. In conclusion, NsPEFs not only eliminate N1-S1 HCC tumours, but also may induce an immuno-protective effect that defends animals against recurrences of the same cancer.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absence of recurrence; Apoptosis; Cancer ablation; Electroporation; Granzyme B; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Immunity; Nanosecond pulsed electric fields; Non-thermal; Orthotopic model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25081978     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  31 in total

1.  Novel glycoside from Wedelia calendulacea inhibits diethyl nitrosamine-induced renal cancer via downregulating the COX-2 and PEG2 through nuclear factor-κB pathway.

Authors:  Amita Verma; Bahar Ahmed; Firoz Anwar; Mahfoozur Rahman; Dinesh Kumar Patel; Gaurav Kaithwas; Ravi Rani; Prakash C Bhatt; Vikas Kumar
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 2.  Immune response triggered by the ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma with nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Jianpeng Liu; Xinhua Chen; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Synergistic effects of an atmospheric pressure plasma jet and pulsed electric field on cells and skin.

Authors:  Chunqi Jiang; Edwin A Oshin; Siqi Guo; Megan Scott; Xi Li; Cathryn Mangiamele; Richard Heller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Plasma Sci IEEE Nucl Plasma Sci Soc       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.222

4.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) and vaccines: a novel technique for the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses?

Authors:  A R Ruiz-Fernández; M Rosemblatt; T Perez-Acle
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

5.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Xudong Miao; Shengyong Yin; Zhou Shao; Yi Zhang; Xinhua Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  10 ns PEFs induce a histological response linked to cell death and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes in an immunocompetent mouse model of peritoneal metastasis.

Authors:  A Taibi; M-L Perrin; J Albouys; J Jacques; C Yardin; S Durand-Fontanier; S M Bardet
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Nanoelectroablation of Murine Tumors Triggers a CD8-Dependent Inhibition of Secondary Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Richard Nuccitelli; Jon Casey Berridge; Zachary Mallon; Mark Kreis; Brian Athos; Pamela Nuccitelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ablation of Myocardial Tissue With Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.

Authors:  Fei Xie; Frency Varghese; Andrei G Pakhomov; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Jonathan Philpott; Christian Zemlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of the Genetic Response of U937 and Jurkat Cells to 10-Nanosecond Electrical Pulses (nsEP).

Authors:  Caleb C Roth; Randolph D Glickman; Gleb P Tolstykh; Larry E Estlack; Erick K Moen; Ibtissam Echchgadda; Hope T Beier; Ronald A Barnes; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hepatocellular carcinoma ablation and possible immunity in the age of nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2015-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.