Literature DB >> 2508162

Dose-dependent and baseline-dependent conditioning with d-amphetamine in the place conditioning paradigm.

N L Costello1, J N Carlson, S D Glick, M Bryda.   

Abstract

The place conditioning paradigm was used to evaluate the positively reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine. During conditioning, female rats were injected (IP) with saline or one of five doses (0.625-5 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine (d-A) and confined to the initially non-preferred side of the testing apparatus. The highest dose of d-A failed to produce a significant preference. The four middle doses of the drug induced a similar preference. A significant increase from baseline was observed on the 4th post-conditioning test day in the five drug groups and controls when given an injection of 1.5 mg/kg d-A 15 min prior to placement in the chamber. Control and drug groups were separated into high and low initial preference sub-groups. Place preferences were more readily induced by d-A in the subgroups with initially high baseline preferences. These findings as well as those of others led us to conclude that the place conditioning paradigm is a somewhat problematic way of measuring drug reinforcement and that the effects observed may not solely be the result of the conditioning of the drug's reinforcing properties to a particular environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2508162     DOI: 10.1007/bf00442816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  12 in total

1.  The effects of progabide (SL 76002) on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference induced by d-amphetamine.

Authors:  G Di Scala; M T Martin-Iverson; A G Phillips; H C Fibiger
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1985-01-02       Impact factor: 4.432

2.  Place preference conditioning with methylphenidate and nomifensine.

Authors:  M T Martin-Iverson; R Ortmann; H C Fibiger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-04-15       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Conditioned place preference with morphine: the effect of extinction training on the reinforcing CR.

Authors:  M T Bardo; J S Miller; J L Neisewander
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination.

Authors:  R F Mucha; S D Iversen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Food deprivation and stimulant self-administration in rats: differences between cocaine and d-amphetamine.

Authors:  S D Glick; P A Hinds; J N Carlson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Blockade of D-1 receptors by SCH 23390 antagonizes morphine- and amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning.

Authors:  P Leone; G Di Chiara
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1987-03-17       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  A potential role of saline trials in morphine-induced place-preference conditioning.

Authors:  M T Scoles; S Siegel
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Sex differences and estrous cycle variations in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior.

Authors:  J B Becker; T E Robinson; K A Lorenz
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1982-05-07       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Diazepam-induced place preference conditioning: appetitive and antiaversive properties.

Authors:  C Spyraki; A Kazandjian; D Varonos
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Different effects of zimelidine on the reinforcing properties of d-amphetamine and morphine on conditioned place preference in rats.

Authors:  A Kruszewska; S Romandini; R Samanin
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1986-06-17       Impact factor: 4.432

View more
  6 in total

1.  Conditioned place preferences induced by hearing song outside the breeding season relate to neural dopamine D1 and cannabinoid CB1 receptor gene expression in female European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  Allison H Hahn; Jeremy A Spool; Caroline S Angyal; Sharon A Stevenson; Lauren V Riters
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Rewarding and aversive properties of IP and SC cocaine: assessment by place and taste conditioning.

Authors:  L A Mayer; L A Parker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  An assessment of MDPV-induced place preference in adult Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Heather E King; Bradley Wetzell; Kenner C Rice; Anthony L Riley
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 4.  Taste avoidance and taste aversion: evidence for two different processes.

Authors:  Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Role of the dopaminergic system of the brain in the effects of glucocorticoid hormones.

Authors:  A A Lebedev; O V Gurkovskaya; A D Nozdrachev; P D Shabanov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03

6.  Naloxone blockade of amphetamine place preference conditioning.

Authors:  K A Trujillo; J D Belluzzi; L Stein
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.