Justin T Lui 1 , Luke Rudmik 1 , Derrick R Randall 2 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To (1) evaluate the potential for recycling uncontaminated preoperative waste and (2) identify recycling differences within otolaryngology-head and neck surgery subspecialties. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Three university-affiliated tertiary level hospitals. SUBJECTS: Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery operative procedures. METHODS: A total of 97 operative procedures were evaluated. Preoperative waste products were sorted into recyclable and nonrecyclable materials; intraoperative waste was weighed for volume but not sorted. The preoperative period was defined as the opening of the surgical supply cart for operating room preparation until procedure initiation. Mass and volume of each type of waste were recorded upon the conclusion of the case. RESULTS: Approximately 23.1% of total operative waste mass (36.7% by volume) was derived from the preoperative set-up, of which 89.7% was recyclable. Pediatric procedures produced the least recyclable material per operation as a proportion of total waste, which was statistically different than the 2 highest recyclable subspecialties, general and rhinology (P = .006); the remaining subspecialties did not statistically differ in proportion of recyclable material produced. CONCLUSION: This study identified a source of clean recyclable materials that could eliminate 21% of operating room waste mass. © American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2014.
OBJECTIVES: To (1) evaluate the potential for recycling uncontaminated preoperative waste and (2) identify recycling differences within otolaryngology-head and neck surgery subspecialties. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Three university-affiliated tertiary level hospitals. SUBJECTS: Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery operative procedures. METHODS: A total of 97 operative procedures were evaluated. Preoperative waste products were sorted into recyclable and nonrecyclable materials; intraoperative waste was weighed for volume but not sorted. The preoperative period was defined as the opening of the surgical supply cart for operating room preparation until procedure initiation. Mass and volume of each type of waste were recorded upon the conclusion of the case. RESULTS: Approximately 23.1% of total operative waste mass (36.7% by volume) was derived from the preoperative set-up, of which 89.7% was recyclable. Pediatric procedures produced the least recyclable material per operation as a proportion of total waste, which was statistically different than the 2 highest recyclable subspecialties, general and rhinology (P = .006); the remaining subspecialties did not statistically differ in proportion of recyclable material produced. CONCLUSION: This study identified a source of clean recyclable materials that could eliminate 21% of operating room waste mass. © American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2014.
Keywords:
ecological footprint; operating room waste; otolaryngology; preoperative waste; recycling; surgical waste
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2014
PMID： 25081609 DOI： 10.1177/0194599814544449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN： 0194-5998 Impact factor: 3.497