BACKGROUND: Endocrine measures of ovarian reserve before breast cancer treatment may predict postchemotherapy ovarian function, providing prognostic information at the time of cancer diagnosis. The objectives of this study were 1) to determine whether prechemotherapy levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and inhibin B (inhB) are associated with the return of ovarian function after chemotherapy and 2) to generate a prognostic score for ovarian recovery in young women with breast cancer. METHODS: A prospective cohort study recruited 109 participants (median age, 39 years; age range, 23-45 years) before chemotherapy from 2 breast clinics and followed them longitudinally. By using time-to-event analysis, the authors tested the association between prechemotherapy AMH, FSH, and inhB levels and the time to return of ovarian function, as measured by menstrual pattern. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 163 days (range, 4-1009 days) after chemotherapy, 62 participants (57%) experienced return of ovarian function. In adjusted analyses, AMH levels >0.7 ng/mL (hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-5.6) and FSH levels ≤10 IU/L (hazard ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-16.8) were associated with a shorter time to ovarian recovery, whereas inhB levels were not related. A prognostic score based on age <40 years, AMH >0.7 ng/mL, and body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2) was used to estimate the timing of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: In reproductive-aged women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, prechemotherapy AMH and FSH levels were associated with the return of ovarian function, independent of age. A novel prognostic score incorporating AMH, age, and body size was capable of estimating the time to ovarian recovery. Pending validation, these data support using prechemotherapy ovarian reserve measures, particularly AMH, to prospectively counsel young patients on future ovarian function. Because ovarian function is not equivalent to fertility, follow-up studies on predicting fertility are needed.
BACKGROUND: Endocrine measures of ovarian reserve before breast cancer treatment may predict postchemotherapy ovarian function, providing prognostic information at the time of cancer diagnosis. The objectives of this study were 1) to determine whether prechemotherapy levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and inhibin B (inhB) are associated with the return of ovarian function after chemotherapy and 2) to generate a prognostic score for ovarian recovery in young women with breast cancer. METHODS: A prospective cohort study recruited 109 participants (median age, 39 years; age range, 23-45 years) before chemotherapy from 2 breast clinics and followed them longitudinally. By using time-to-event analysis, the authors tested the association between prechemotherapy AMH, FSH, and inhB levels and the time to return of ovarian function, as measured by menstrual pattern. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 163 days (range, 4-1009 days) after chemotherapy, 62 participants (57%) experienced return of ovarian function. In adjusted analyses, AMH levels >0.7 ng/mL (hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-5.6) and FSH levels ≤10 IU/L (hazard ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-16.8) were associated with a shorter time to ovarian recovery, whereas inhB levels were not related. A prognostic score based on age <40 years, AMH >0.7 ng/mL, and body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2) was used to estimate the timing of recovery. CONCLUSIONS: In reproductive-aged women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, prechemotherapy AMH and FSH levels were associated with the return of ovarian function, independent of age. A novel prognostic score incorporating AMH, age, and body size was capable of estimating the time to ovarian recovery. Pending validation, these data support using prechemotherapy ovarian reserve measures, particularly AMH, to prospectively counsel young patients on future ovarian function. Because ovarian function is not equivalent to fertility, follow-up studies on predicting fertility are needed.
Authors: J Byrne; T R Fears; M H Gail; D Pee; R R Connelly; D F Austin; G F Holmes; F F Holmes; H B Latourette; J W Meigs Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: W Willett; M J Stampfer; C Bain; R Lipnick; F E Speizer; B Rosner; D Cramer; C H Hennekens Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1983-06 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Nanette Santoro; Sarah Brockwell; Janet Johnston; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Siobán D Harlow; Karen A Matthews; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: Menopause Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Christien Weenen; Joop S E Laven; Anne R M Von Bergh; Mark Cranfield; Nigel P Groome; Jenny A Visser; Piet Kramer; Bart C J M Fauser; Axel P N Themmen Journal: Mol Hum Reprod Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Jeanne A Petrek; Michelle J Naughton; L Douglas Case; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth Z Naftalis; S Eva Singletary; Paniti Sukumvanich Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael V Homer; Lindsey M Charo; Loki Natarajan; Carolyn Haunschild; Karine Chung; Jun J Mao; Angela M DeMichele; H Irene Su Journal: Menopause Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Beth Zhou; Brian Kwan; Milli J Desai; Vinit Nalawade; Kathryn J Ruddy; Paul C Nathan; Henry J Henk; James D Murphy; Brian W Whitcomb; H Irene Su Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 7.490
Authors: Agnese Barnabei; Lidia Strigari; Paolo Marchetti; Valentina Sini; Liana De Vecchis; Salvatore Maria Corsello; Francesco Torino Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-09-04
Authors: Kathryn J Ruddy; Daniel J Schaid; Anthony Batzler; Reena S Cecchini; Ann H Partridge; Aaron Norman; Louis Fehrenbacher; Elizabeth A Stewart; Emanuel Trabuco; Elizabeth Ginsburg; Fergus J Couch; Peter A Fasching; Celine Vachon; Patricia A Ganz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Valentino Martelli; Maria Maddalena Latocca; Tommaso Ruelle; Marta Perachino; Luca Arecco; Kristi Beshiri; Maria Grazia Razeti; Marco Tagliamento; Maurizio Cosso; Piero Fregatti; Matteo Lambertini Journal: Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Date: 2021-05-24