Literature DB >> 2508153

Comparison of the effects of four cholinomimetic agents on cognition in primates following disruption by scopolamine or by lists of objects.

N M Rupniak1, M J Steventon, M J Field, C A Jennings, S D Iversen.   

Abstract

The ability of four central cholinomimetics to reverse a scopolamine-induced spatial memory impairment or to improve visual recognition memory in primates was examined. Physostigmine (0.04-0.08 mg/kg IM) fully reversed the effects of scopolamine (0.03 mg/kg). Coadministration of pilocarpine (3.0-5.0 mg/kg) caused partial reversal of the scopolamine impairment after intermediate or long retention intervals (10 or 20 s). Treatment with arecoline (0.1-1.8 mg/kg) or nicotine (1.0-2.0 mg/kg) generally did not reverse the effects of scopolamine. A task in which memory could be taxed by increasing the number of visual stimuli presented appeared more sensitive to the effects of cholinomimetics on cognition than the scopolamine reversal model. In this paradigm treatment with physostigmine (0.001, 0.01 or 0.03 mg/kg) increased choice accuracy from about 55 to 70% correct. Arecoline improved performance at one dose only (0.1 mg/kg) which also induced marked adverse side-effects (salivation and tremor). Pilocarpine improved performance in the dose range 0.125-0.35 mg/kg, but not at higher doses which also induced marked salivation. Treatment with nicotine (0.001-2.0 mg/kg tended to improve performance but this did not reach statistical significance. The relevance of these findings for studies in man and for animal models of dementia is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2508153     DOI: 10.1007/bf00442806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biochemical measurement of muscarinic receptor efficacy and its role in receptor regulation.

Authors:  S B Freedman; E A Harley; L L Iversen
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 14.819

2.  Effects of aging and dementia upon recent visuospatial memory.

Authors:  C Flicker; R T Bartus; T H Crook; S H Ferris
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Scopolamine effects on visual discrimination: modifications related to stimulus control.

Authors:  H L Evans
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Physostigmine: improvement of long-term memory processes in normal humans.

Authors:  K L Davis; R C Mohs; J R Tinklenberg; A Pfefferbaum; L E Hollister; B S Kopell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Selective delayed response deficits in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M Freedman; M Oscar-Berman
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1986-09

6.  Regional distribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in normal and Alzheimer's-type dementia brains.

Authors:  P Davies; A H Verth
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-12-16       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  The effects of physostigmine and scopolamine on recognition memory in monkeys.

Authors:  T G Aigner; M Mishkin
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1986-01

8.  Nicotine enhances delayed matching-to-sample performance by primates.

Authors:  K Elrod; J J Buccafusco; W J Jackson
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.037

  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Muscarinic tone sustains impulse flow in the septohippocampal GABA but not cholinergic pathway: implications for learning and memory.

Authors:  M Alreja; M Wu; W Liu; J B Atkins; C Leranth; M Shanabrough
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  M channel KCNQ2 subunits are localized to key sites for control of neuronal network oscillations and synchronization in mouse brain.

Authors:  E C Cooper; E Harrington; Y N Jan; L Y Jan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists and allosteric modulators for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Carrie K Jones; Nellie Byun; Michael Bubser
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Behavioral screening for cognition enhancers: from indiscriminate to valid testing: Part II.

Authors:  M Sarter; J Hagan; P Dudchenko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Behavioral screening for cognition enhancers: from indiscriminate to valid testing: Part I.

Authors:  M Sarter; J Hagan; P Dudchenko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of cholinergic and non-cholinergic drugs on visual discrimination and delayed visual discrimination performance in rats.

Authors:  J S Andrews; M Grützner; D N Stephens
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Memory modulation with peripherally acting cholinergic drugs.

Authors:  D K Rush; K Streit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Attenuation of scopolamine-induced spatial memory deficits in the rat by cholinomimetic and non-cholinomimetic drugs using a novel task in the 12-arm radial maze.

Authors:  R P Dennes; J C Barnes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligands on behavioral vigilance in rats.

Authors:  J Turchi; L A Holley; M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Nicotinic systems and cognitive function.

Authors:  E D Levin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.