Literature DB >> 25081409

Performance characteristics of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in unselected women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who have undergone universal germline mutation testing.

Sarah E Ferguson1, Melyssa Aronson, Aaron Pollett, Lua R Eiriksson, Amit M Oza, Steven Gallinger, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Zahra Alvandi, Marcus Q Bernardini, Helen J MacKay, Golnessa Mojtahedi, Alicia A Tone, Christine Massey, Blaise A Clarke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, tumor morphology, and family history were compared to determine which screening strategy is superior in identifying Lynch syndrome (LS) in unselected women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer (EC) who have undergone universal germline mutation testing.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed that recruited women with newly diagnosed EC. Participants completed a family history assessment with molecular characterization of EC with IHC and MSI testing and EC assessment for LS-associated morphologic features and underwent universal germline mutation testing for mutations in the mismatch repair pathway. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were compared between the screening strategies.
RESULTS: A total of 118 (65%) of 182 consecutive women with EC participated. Of these, 34 women (29%) had tumors that were IHC deficient and 27 women (23%; N = 117) had tumors that were positive for MSI. Twenty women (17%) met IHC criteria and 16 women (15.2%, N = 105) met family history criteria based on Ontario Ministry of Health Criteria for the genetic assessment for LS. Seven women (5.9%) had a germline mutation: 4 had MLH1 (mutL homolog 1), 2 had MSH6 (mutS homolog 6), and 1 had MSH2 (mutS homolog 2). IHC in women aged <60 years had the best performance characteristics, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 86.1%, a positive predictive value of 58.3%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. Family history and tumor morphology both had the lowest sensitivity at 71.4%. Overall tumor morphology had the poorest performance, with a specificity of 42.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: The mutation rate of 5.9% was higher than expected in this unselected cohort of women with EC. The superior screening strategy to identify women presenting with EC is universal IHC screening in women aged <60 years.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lynch syndrome; endometrial cancer; germline mutation testing; immunohistochemistry; mismatch repair

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25081409     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 2: TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Shona Hendry; Roberto Salgado; Thomas Gevaert; Prudence A Russell; Tom John; Bibhusal Thapa; Michael Christie; Koen van de Vijver; M V Estrada; Paula I Gonzalez-Ericsson; Melinda Sanders; Benjamin Solomon; Cinzia Solinas; Gert G G M Van den Eynden; Yves Allory; Matthias Preusser; Johannes Hainfellner; Giancarlo Pruneri; Andrea Vingiani; Sandra Demaria; Fraser Symmans; Paolo Nuciforo; Laura Comerma; E A Thompson; Sunil Lakhani; Seong-Rim Kim; Stuart Schnitt; Cecile Colpaert; Christos Sotiriou; Stefan J Scherer; Michail Ignatiadis; Sunil Badve; Robert H Pierce; Giuseppe Viale; Nicolas Sirtaine; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Tomohagu Sugie; Susan Fineberg; Soonmyung Paik; Ashok Srinivasan; Andrea Richardson; Yihong Wang; Ewa Chmielik; Jane Brock; Douglas B Johnson; Justin Balko; Stephan Wienert; Veerle Bossuyt; Stefan Michiels; Nils Ternes; Nicole Burchardi; Stephen J Luen; Peter Savas; Frederick Klauschen; Peter H Watson; Brad H Nelson; Carmen Criscitiello; Sandra O'Toole; Denis Larsimont; Roland de Wind; Giuseppe Curigliano; Fabrice André; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Mark van de Vijver; Federico Rojo; Giuseppe Floris; Shahinaz Bedri; Joseph Sparano; David Rimm; Torsten Nielsen; Zuzana Kos; Stephen Hewitt; Baljit Singh; Gelareh Farshid; Sibylle Loibl; Kimberly H Allison; Nadine Tung; Sylvia Adams; Karen Willard-Gallo; Hugo M Horlings; Leena Gandhi; Andre Moreira; Fred Hirsch; Maria V Dieci; Maria Urbanowicz; Iva Brcic; Konstanty Korski; Fabien Gaire; Hartmut Koeppen; Amy Lo; Jennifer Giltnane; Marlon C Rebelatto; Keith E Steele; Jiping Zha; Kenneth Emancipator; Jonathan W Juco; Carsten Denkert; Jorge Reis-Filho; Sherene Loi; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 2.  Update on Genetic Testing in Gynecologic Cancer.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Laboratory Assays in Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bojana Djordjevic; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2016-04-11

4.  Universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome: perspectives of Canadian pathologists and genetic counselors.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dicks; Daryl Pullman; Ken Kao; Andrée MacMillan; Charlene Simmonds; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Differences in Microsatellite Instability Profiles between Endometrioid and Colorectal Cancers: A Potential Cause for False-Negative Results?

Authors:  Yang Wang; Chanjuan Shi; Rosana Eisenberg; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer: New purpose for an old test.

Authors:  Katherine C Kurnit; Shannon N Westin; Robert L Coleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Understanding inherited risk in unselected newly diagnosed patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Karen A Cadoo; Diana L Mandelker; Semanti Mukherjee; Carolyn Stewart; Deborah DeLair; Vignesh Ravichandran; Preethi Srinivasan; Daire Hurley; Yelena Kemel; Angela G Arnold; Margaret Sheehan; Nisha Pradhan; Vijai Joseph; Dennis S Chi; Ginger J Gardner; Elizabeth L Jewell; Mario M Leitao; Kara Long Roche; Jennifer J Mueller; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; Michael Walsh; Maria I Carlo; Michael F Berger; David Hyman; Liying Zhang; Mark E Robson; Kenneth Offit; Carol Aghajanian; Nadeem R Abu Rustum; Zsofia Stadler
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-04-25

8.  Uterine endometrial carcinoma with DNA mismatch repair deficiency: magnetic resonance imaging findings and clinical features.

Authors:  Kiyoyuki Minamiguchi; Junko Takahama; Tomoko Uchiyama; Ryosuke Taiji; Natsuhiko Saito; Hiroshi Okada; Nagaaki Marugami; Yasuhito Tanase; Ryuji Kawaguchi; Chiho Ohbayashi; Hiroshi Kobayashi; Toshiko Hirai; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 9.  Advances in Hereditary Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Katharine A Germansky; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Incidence of germline variants in Lynch syndrome-related genes among Japanese endometrial cancer patients aged 40 years or younger.

Authors:  Takeshi Makabe; Wataru Yamagami; Akira Hirasawa; Izumi Miyabe; Tomokazu Wakatsuki; Mari Kikuchi; Akemi Takahashi; Junko Noda; Go Yamamoto; Daisuke Aoki; Kiwamu Akagi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.