Literature DB >> 25081301

Knowing your enemies: Integrating molecular and ecological methods to assess the impact of arthropod predators on crop pests.

Michael J Furlong1.   

Abstract

The importance of natural enemies as the foundation of integrated pest management (IPM) is widely accepted, but few studies conduct the manipulative field experiments necessary to directly quantify their impact on pest populations in this context. This is particularly true for predators. Studying arthropod predator-prey interactions is inherently difficult: prey items are often completely consumed, individual predator-prey interactions are ephemeral (rendering their detection difficult) and the typically fluid or soft-bodied meals cannot be easily identified visually within predator guts. Serological techniques have long been used in arthropod predator gut-contents analysis, and current enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are highly specific and sensitive. Recently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for gut-contents analysis have developed rapidly and they now dominate the diagnostic methods used for gut-contents analysis in field-based research. This work has identified trophic linkages within food webs, determined predator diet breadth and preference, demonstrated the importance of cannibalism and intraguild predation within and between certain taxa, and confirmed the benefits (predator persistence) and potential disadvantages (reduced feeding on pest species) of the availability of alternative nonpest prey. Despite considerable efforts to calibrate gut-contents assays, these methods remain qualitative. Available techniques for predator gut-contents analysis can provide rapid, accurate, cost-effective identification of predation events. As such, they perfectly compliment the ecological methods developed to directly assess predator impacts on prey populations but which are imperfect at identifying the key predators. These diagnostic methods for gut-contents analysis are underexploited in agricultural research and they are almost never applied in unison with the critical field experiments to measure predator impact. This paper stresses the need for a combined approach and suggests a framework that would make this possible, so that appropriate natural enemies can be targeted in conservation biological control.
© 2014 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Keywords:  conservation biological control; enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); gut-contents analysis; immunomarking; integrated pest management (IPM); polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25081301     DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insect Sci        ISSN: 1672-9609            Impact factor:   3.262


  13 in total

1.  Molecular Marker to Identify Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) DNA in Gut Content of Predators.

Authors:  F Nanini; D H Maggio; P Ferronato; G Rugno; P T Yamamoto; A S Corrêa
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 1.434

Review 2.  MALDI-TOF MS Profiling-Advances in Species Identification of Pests, Parasites, and Vectors.

Authors:  Jayaseelan Murugaiyan; Uwe Roesler
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 3.  Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies.

Authors:  Klaus Birkhofer; Helena Bylund; Peter Dalin; Olga Ferlian; Vesna Gagic; Peter A Hambäck; Maartje Klapwijk; Laia Mestre; Eve Roubinet; Martin Schroeder; Johan A Stenberg; Mario Porcel; Christer Björkman; Mattias Jonsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Molecular Tools for the Detection and the Identification of Hymenoptera Parasitoids in Tortricid Fruit Pests.

Authors:  Pierre Franck; Mariline Maalouly-Matar; Jérôme Olivares
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Multivariate ordination identifies vegetation types associated with spider conservation in brassica crops.

Authors:  Hafiz Sohaib Ahmed Saqib; Minsheng You; Geoff M Gurr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  DNA Metabarcoding as a Tool for Disentangling Food Webs in Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Ahmadou Sow; Julien Haran; Laure Benoit; Maxime Galan; Thierry Brévault
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.769

7.  Next-generation sequencing analysis of Pardosa pseudoannulata's diet composition in different habitats.

Authors:  Wentao Zhong; Zhaojun Tan; Bo Wang; Hengmei Yan
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Predation on stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in cotton and soybean agroecosystems.

Authors:  Kacie J Athey; John R Ruberson; Dawn M Olson; James D Harwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hymenopteran Parasitoids of Aphid Pests within Australian Grain Production Landscapes.

Authors:  Samantha E Ward; Paul A Umina; Sarina Macfadyen; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 10.  Conservation Biological Control of Pests in the Molecular Era: New Opportunities to Address Old Constraints.

Authors:  Geoff M Gurr; Minsheng You
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.