Literature DB >> 25081103

Hand-use and tool-use in grasping control.

Yoshihiro Itaguchi1, Kazuyoshi Fukuzawa.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of hand and tool grasping control. We assumed that there is a single principle-governing grasping control irrespective of its effectors and that the degree of prior experience of the effector determines the smoothness of aperture control. Eight participants performed a reach-to-grasp task with four different effectors: index finger and thumb, middle finger and thumb, chopsticks, and a scissor-like tool. Although we employed different effectors with large mechanical variations and different degrees of prior use, maximum grip aperture was scaled as a function of object size and appeared at almost the same timing in all four types of grasping movements. Moreover, reaching time did not substantially differ among grasping conditions. However, plateau duration of the aperture profile differed by effector. Plateau duration was the longest in the unfamiliar scissor-like tool grasping condition. There was no difference between the unfamiliar hand-use grasp with the thumb and the middle finger and the familiar tool-grasp with chopsticks. The familiar hand-use grasp with the thumb and the index finger had the shortest plateau duration. These results supported the idea that there is an effector-independent continuity between hand-use and tool-use in motor control as a function of prior degree of use, rather than the conventionally assumed dichotomy between them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25081103     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4053-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields.

Authors:  N Bhushan; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

4.  Action plans used in action observation.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Observed effector-independent motor learning by observing.

Authors:  Alexandra Williams; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Francesca Frassinetti; Claudio Brozzoli; Christian Urquizar; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis. New perspectives on apraxia of tool use.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Christophe Jarry; Didier Le Gall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements.

Authors:  T R Kaminski; C Bock; A M Gentile
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

1.  The heavier the arm, the higher the action: the effects of forearm-weight changes on reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Luna Ando; Yoshihiro Itaguchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot.

Authors:  Yuqi Liu; James Caracoglia; Sriparna Sen; Erez Freud; Ella Striem-Amit
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Use of a visual feedback-equipped reacher in reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Do; Won-Gyu Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.