OBJECTIVE: Analysis of hospitalization data can help elucidate the pattern of morbidity and mortality in any given area. Little data exist on critically ill children admitted to hospitals in the resource-limited nation of Nepal. We sought to characterize the profile, management, and mortality of children admitted to one PICU. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A newly established PICU in Nepal. PATIENTS: All patients between the ages of 0 to 16 years admitted to the PICU from July 2009 to July 2010. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In 12 months, 126 children were admitted to the PICU including 43% female patients. Sixty-three percent were under 5 years. Twenty-nine percent came from tertiary care hospitals and 38% from rural areas outside Kathmandu. Only 18% were transported by ambulance. Median distance travelled to be admitted was 30 km (interquartile range, 10-193). Highest number of admissions were in spring (40%) followed by summer (25%). Almost half were admitted for shock (45%), particularly septic shock (30%). The second commonest reason for admission was neurologic etiologies (15%). Neonatal admissions were also significant (19%). Mortality was 26% and was significantly associated with septic shock (p < 0.01), mechanical ventilation (p < 0.01), and multiple organ dysfunction (< 0.05). Almost one third of patients required mechanical ventilation; median duration was 4 days (interquartile range, 2-8). Mean length of stay in the hospital was 6.2 days (± 5.3) and median 4 (interquartile range, 2.5-9.0). Median Pediatric Risk of Mortality II score for nonsurvivors was 12 (interquartile range, 7-21), and median Pediatric Index of Mortality II for nonsurvivors was 10 (interquartile range, 3-32). CONCLUSIONS: Within a short time of opening, the PICU has been seeing significant numbers of critically ill children. Despite adverse conditions and limited resources, survival of 75% is similar to many units in developing nations. Sepsis was the most common reason for PICU admission and mortality.
OBJECTIVE: Analysis of hospitalization data can help elucidate the pattern of morbidity and mortality in any given area. Little data exist on critically ill children admitted to hospitals in the resource-limited nation of Nepal. We sought to characterize the profile, management, and mortality of children admitted to one PICU. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A newly established PICU in Nepal. PATIENTS: All patients between the ages of 0 to 16 years admitted to the PICU from July 2009 to July 2010. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In 12 months, 126 children were admitted to the PICU including 43% female patients. Sixty-three percent were under 5 years. Twenty-nine percent came from tertiary care hospitals and 38% from rural areas outside Kathmandu. Only 18% were transported by ambulance. Median distance travelled to be admitted was 30 km (interquartile range, 10-193). Highest number of admissions were in spring (40%) followed by summer (25%). Almost half were admitted for shock (45%), particularly septic shock (30%). The second commonest reason for admission was neurologic etiologies (15%). Neonatal admissions were also significant (19%). Mortality was 26% and was significantly associated with septic shock (p < 0.01), mechanical ventilation (p < 0.01), and multiple organ dysfunction (< 0.05). Almost one third of patients required mechanical ventilation; median duration was 4 days (interquartile range, 2-8). Mean length of stay in the hospital was 6.2 days (± 5.3) and median 4 (interquartile range, 2.5-9.0). Median Pediatric Risk of Mortality II score for nonsurvivors was 12 (interquartile range, 7-21), and median Pediatric Index of Mortality II for nonsurvivors was 10 (interquartile range, 3-32). CONCLUSIONS: Within a short time of opening, the PICU has been seeing significant numbers of critically ill children. Despite adverse conditions and limited resources, survival of 75% is similar to many units in developing nations. Sepsis was the most common reason for PICU admission and mortality.
Authors: Erin L Turner; Katie R Nielsen; Shelina M Jamal; Amelie von Saint André-von Arnim; Ndidiamaka L Musa Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Sheri S Crow; Beth A Ballinger; Mariela Rivera; David Tsibadze; Nino Gakhokidze; Nino Zavrashvili; Matthew J Ritter; Grace M Arteaga Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Louisdon Pierre; Adebayo Adeyinka; Marilyn Kioko; Jose F Hernandez Rivera; Rohit Pinto Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 1.671