Literature DB >> 25080037

Long-term stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel osseointegrated implant for bone conduction hearing: 3-year data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical investigation.

Rik C Nelissen1, Joacim Stalfors, Maarten J F de Wolf, Mark C Flynn, Stina Wigren, Måns Eeg-Olofsson, Kevin Green, Michael P Rothera, Emmanuel A M Mylanus, Myrthe K S Hol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability of 2 osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing: a wide 4.5-mm-diameter moderately roughened implant with a rounded 6-mm abutment (test) and a 3.75-mm diameter as-machined implant with a conically shaped 5.5-mm abutment (control). STUDY
DESIGN: In this randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical study, 77 adult patients were included. Test and control implants were randomly assigned in proportions of 2:1. The implants were loaded with the sound processor from 6 weeks postimplantation. Follow-up after surgery was conducted at 10 days; at 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks; and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. At every visit, implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and skin reactions were evaluated according to Holgers' classification.
RESULTS: Statistically significantly higher mean ISQ values were recorded for the test implant compared with the control implant at each evaluation time point. Between 2 and 3 years after surgery, ISQ values decreased but remained above baseline values. Implant survival was high for both implants: 96.2% of the test implants and 100% of the control implants survived these 3 years. Statistically significantly improved soft tissue outcomes were observed in the test implant group.
CONCLUSION: This extensive long-term clinical investigation demonstrated that the test implant is more stable in terms of ISQ-values and provides high tolerability for the soft tissue. The results show that implant loading at 6 weeks is safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25080037     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  16 in total

1.  Switching from a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone anchored hearing system: the utility of the fascia temporalis superficialis pedicled flap in case of skin intolerance.

Authors:  A Devèze; S Rossetto; R Meller; M Sanjuan Puchol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Surgery Training System Supported by Organic Materials.

Authors:  Magdalena Błaszczyk; Jadwiga Gabor; Tomasz Flak; Zygmunt Wróbel; Andrzej S Swinarew
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Predisposing factors for adverse skin reactions with percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices implanted with skin reduction techniques.

Authors:  Claudia Candreia; Ruth Birrer; Susanna Fistarol; Martin Kompis; Marco Caversaccio; Andreas Arnold; Christof Stieger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Loading of osseointegrated implants for bone conduction hearing at 3 weeks: 3-year stability, survival, and tolerability.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Hubert T Faber; Catharina A J Dun; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Christine A den Besten; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Auditory Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Christine A den Besten; Joacim Stalfors; Stina Wigren; Johan Ivarsson Blechert; Mark Flynn; Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Rohini Aggarwal; Kevin Green; Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Three-year experience with the Sophono in children with congenital conductive unilateral hearing loss: tolerability, audiometry, and sound localization compared to a bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Martijn J H Agterberg; Myrthe K S Hol; Ad F M Snik
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing.

Authors:  Ivo J Kruyt; Rik C Nelissen; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Myrthe K S Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Martin L Johansson; Omar Omar; Hanna Simonsson; Anders Palmquist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim G A Calon; Marc van Hoof; Herbert van den Berge; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Joost van Tongeren; Janny R Hof; Jan Wouter Brunings; Sofia Jonhede; Lucien J C Anteunis; Miranda Janssen; Manuela A Joore; Marcus Holmberg; Martin L Johansson; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.