Literature DB >> 25079218

The rules of implicit evaluation by race, religion, and age.

Jordan R Axt1, Charles R Ebersole2, Brian A Nosek3.   

Abstract

The social world is stratified. Social hierarchies are known but often disavowed as anachronisms or unjust. Nonetheless, hierarchies may persist in social memory. In three studies (total N > 200,000), we found evidence of social hierarchies in implicit evaluation by race, religion, and age. Participants implicitly evaluated their own racial group most positively and the remaining racial groups in accordance with the following hierarchy: Whites > Asians > Blacks > Hispanics. Similarly, participants implicitly evaluated their own religion most positively and the remaining religions in accordance with the following hierarchy: Christianity > Judaism > Hinduism or Buddhism > Islam. In a final study, participants of all ages implicitly evaluated age groups following this rule: children > young adults > middle-age adults > older adults. These results suggest that the rules of social evaluation are pervasively embedded in culture and mind.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  associative processes; open data; open materials; prejudice; racial and ethnic attitudes and relations; social cognition; social perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25079218     DOI: 10.1177/0956797614543801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  13 in total

Review 1.  An Examination of Age-Based Stereotype Threat About Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-01

2.  The project implicit international dataset: Measuring implicit and explicit social group attitudes and stereotypes across 34 countries (2009-2019).

Authors:  Tessa E S Charlesworth; Mayan Navon; Yoav Rabinovich; Nicole Lofaro; Benedek Kurdi
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Age Differences in Explicit and Implicit Age Attitudes Across the Life Span.

Authors:  William J Chopik; Hannah L Giasson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-08-01

4.  The good and the bad: Are some attribute words better than others in the Implicit Association Test?

Authors:  Jordan R Axt; Tony Y Feng; Yoav Bar-Anan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-05-04

5.  Explicit Not Implicit Preferences Predict Conservation Intentions for Endangered Species and Biomes.

Authors:  Alejandra Echeverri; Megan M Callahan; Kai M A Chan; Terre Satterfield; Jiaying Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Underweight vs. overweight/obese: which weight category do we prefer? Dissociation of weight-related preferences at the explicit and implicit level.

Authors:  M Marini
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2017-11-21

7.  Implicit Age Cues in Resumes: Subtle Effects on Hiring Discrimination.

Authors:  Eva Derous; Jeroen Decoster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-10

8.  Evaluating the Relationship between Explicit and Implicit Drinking Identity Centrality and Hazardous Drinking.

Authors:  Kristen P Lindgren; Jason J Ramirez; Nauder Namaky; Cecilia C Olin; Bethany A Teachman
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2016-10-27

Review 9.  The ironic effect of older adults' increased task motivation: Implications for neurocognitive aging.

Authors:  A Dawn Ryan; Karen L Campbell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Time-of-day effects in implicit racial in-group preferences are likely selection effects, not circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Timothy P Schofield
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.