Literature DB >> 25079133

Isolated glenohumeral range of motion, excluding side-to-side difference in humeral retroversion, in asymptomatic high-school baseball players.

Teruhisa Mihata1,2,3, Atsushi Takeda4, Takeshi Kawakami5, Yasuo Itami5, Chisato Watanabe5, Munekazu Doi6, Masashi Neo5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Glenohumeral range of motion is correlated with shoulder capsular condition and is thus considered to be predictive of shoulder pathology. However, in throwing athletes, a side-to-side difference in humeral retroversion makes it difficult to evaluate capsular condition on the basis of glenohumeral range of motion measured by using the conventional technique. The purpose of this study was to measure isolated glenohumeral rotation, excluding side-to-side differences in humeral retroversion, in asymptomatic high-school baseball players.
METHODS: A total of 195 high-school baseball players (52 pitchers and 143 position players; median age, 16 years) and 20 high-school non-throwing athletes (median age, 16 years) without any shoulder symptoms were enroled in this study. Glenohumeral external and internal rotations were measured by using both a conventional technique and our ultrasound-assisted technique. This technique, neutral rotation, was standardized on the basis of the ultrasonographically visualized location of the bicipital groove to exclude side-to-side differences in humeral retroversion from the calculated rotation angle. Intra- and inter-observer agreements of rotational measurements were evaluated by using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).
RESULTS: Isolated glenohumeral rotation measurements, excluding side-to-side differences in humeral retroversion, demonstrated excellent intra-observer (ICC > 0.89) and inter-observer (ICC > 0.78) agreements. Isolated glenohumeral internal rotation was significantly less in the dominant shoulder than in the non-dominant shoulder in asymptomatic baseball players (P < 0.001). Isolated glenohumeral external rotation in baseball players was significantly greater than in non-throwing athletes (P < 0.05). In the baseball players, humeral torsion in the dominant shoulder was significantly greater than that in the non-dominant shoulder (P < 0.001), indicating that the retroversion angle was greater in dominant shoulders than in non-dominant shoulders.
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated glenohumeral external and internal rotations can be measured with high intra- and inter-observer reliability with the exclusion of side-to-side differences in humeral retroversion. Capsular and muscular changes in the throwing shoulder may be better evaluated by using our ultrasound-assisted technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baseball; External rotation; Glenohumeral; Humeral torsion; Internal rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25079133     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3193-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

Review 1.  The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part I: pathoanatomy and biomechanics.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Craig D Morgan; W Ben Kibler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Bony adaptation of the proximal humerus and glenoid correlate within the throwing shoulder of professional baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Douglas J Wyland; Stephan G Pill; Ellen Shanley; J C Clark; Richard J Hawkins; Thomas J Noonan; Michael J Kissenberth; Charles A Thigpen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  The bicipital groove; a visible record of humeral torsion.

Authors:  V E KRAHL
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1948-07

4.  Shoulder motion and laxity in the professional baseball player.

Authors:  L U Bigliani; T P Codd; P M Connor; W N Levine; M A Littlefield; S J Hershon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  Shoulder instability in the overhand or throwing athlete.

Authors:  R S Kvitne; F W Jobe; C M Jobe
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.182

6.  Classification and treatment of shoulder dysfunction in the overhead athlete.

Authors:  F W Jobe; M Pink
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 7.  The athlete's shoulder.

Authors:  F W Jobe; M Pink
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

8.  Osseous adaptation and range of motion at the glenohumeral joint in professional baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Heber C Crockett; Lyndon B Gross; Kevin E Wilk; Martin L Schwartz; Jamie Reed; Jay O'Mara; Michael T Reilly; Jeffery R Dugas; Keith Meister; Stephen Lyman; James R Andrews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Humeral retroversion and its relationship to glenohumeral rotation in the shoulder of college baseball players.

Authors:  K M Reagan; Keith Meister; Mary Beth Horodyski; Dave W Werner; Cathy Carruthers; Kevin Wilk
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Ultrasonographic measurement of humeral torsion.

Authors:  N Ito; M Eto; K Maeda; M E Rabbi; K Iwasaki
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association between acromioclavicular joint pain and capsular bulging in adolescent baseball players.

Authors:  Taku Hatta; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Hirotaka Sano; Hideaki Nagamoto; Daisuke Kurokawa; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Minoru Tanaka; Yoichi Koike; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Reliability and Validity of a 1-Person Technique to Measure Humeral Torsion Using Ultrasound.

Authors:  Daniel C Hannah; Jason S Scibek; Christopher R Carcia; Amy L Phelps
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Residual Effects of Glenohumeral Range of Motion, Strength, and Humeral Retroversion on Prior Overhead Athletes After Cessation of Sport.

Authors:  Jessica L Downs Talmage; Abigail M Cramer; Gretchen D Oliver
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  The Relationship Between Humeral Torsion and Arm Injury in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua K Helmkamp; Garrett S Bullock; Allison Rao; Ellen Shanley; Charles Thigpen; Grant E Garrigues
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  The Effect of Straight-Line Long-Toss Versus Ultra-Long-Toss Throwing on Passive Glenohumeral Range of Motion Recovery After Pitching.

Authors:  T David Luo; Aaron D Sciascia; Austin V Stone; Chukwuweike U Gwam; Christopher A Grimes; Jeffrey G Strahm; Sandeep Mannava; G Lane Naugher; Brian R Waterman; Michael T Freehill
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  The Relationship Between Humeral Retrotorsion and Shoulder Range of Motion in Baseball Players With an Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear.

Authors:  Bobby Jean S Lee; J Craig Garrison; John E Conway; Kalyssa Pollard; Subhash Aryal
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-10

7.  Little Leaguer's Shoulder Can Cause Severe Three-Dimensional Humeral Deformity.

Authors:  Yuji Hosokawa; Teruhisa Mihata; Yasuo Itami; Masashi Neo; Munekazu Doi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11-10

8.  Conventional Humeral Retroversion Measurements Using Computed Tomography Slices or Ultrasound Images Are Not Correlated With the 3-Dimensional Humeral Retroversion Angle.

Authors:  Masayuki Saka; Hiroki Yamauchi; Toru Yoshioka; Hidetoshi Hamada; Kazuyoshi Gamada
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-03-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.