Literature DB >> 25078769

The effectiveness of the APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA prognostic scoring systems in patients with haematological malignancies in the intensive care unit.

Wioletta Sawicka1, Radosław Owczuk, Magdalena Anna Wujtewicz, Maria Wujtewicz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related mortality remains the second most common cause of death in Poland. In many cases, the occurrence of treatment-related complications requires admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical application of the APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA scales to evaluate the risk of death in patients with haematological malignancies treated in the ICU.
METHODS: This study's analysis included 99 patients, who were each assigned to one of the following two groups: surviving patients who were discharged from the ICU (n = 24); and patients who died in the ICU (n = 75). Analysis was performed using demographic, clinical and laboratory data obtained during the patient's admission to the ICU and also during the first 24 hours of intensive therapy. Patient assessment was performed using the APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA scoring systems as well as other clinical variables.
RESULTS: Univariate logistic regression identified the following risk factors of death in patients with haematological malignancies: systolic (P = 0.006), diastolic (P = 0.01) and mean arterial pressure values (P = 0.009); occurrence of acute kidney injury; neutrophil (P = 0.009) and platelet count in the peripheral blood (P = 0.001); and the SAPS II (P = 0.00005), SOFA (P = 0.00009) and APACHE II (P = 0.0007) scores. SAPS II score was the only independent risk factor of patient death in multivariate analysis (P = 0.0004; unitary OR 1.052 [95% CI: 1.022-1.082]).
CONCLUSION: Of all the applied patient assessment scales, only the SAPS II score was found to be useful in subjects with haematological malignancies hospitalised in the ICU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25078769     DOI: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther        ISSN: 1642-5758


  10 in total

1.  Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.

Authors:  XueZhong Xing; Yong Gao; HaiJun Wang; ChuLin Huang; ShiNing Qu; Hao Zhang; Hao Wang; KeLin Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scoring systems for prognostication of outcomes among Intensive Care Unit's patients.

Authors:  M Hosseini; J Ramazani
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

3.  High serum lactate level may predict death within 24 hours.

Authors:  Arnon Blum; Abd Almajid Zoubi; Shiran Kuria; Nava Blum
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 4.  The prognostic factors for patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Qian Cheng; Yishu Tang; Qing Yang; Erhua Wang; Jing Liu; Xin Li
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-29

5.  A new scoring model for the prediction of mortality in patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Min Luo; Yuan Yang; Jun Xu; Wei Cheng; Xu-Wei Li; Mi-Mi Tang; Hong Liu; Fu-You Liu; Shao-Bin Duan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Preseptic Period and Inflammatory Markers in the Prediction of the Course of Sepsis.

Authors:  Ömer Faruk Boran; Fatih Mehmet Yazar; Maruf Boran; Aykut Urfalıoğlu; Zeyneb Bakacak; Mürşide Yıldız; Fethi Gül; Selma Güler
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-27

7.  Intensive Care Outcomes of Patients after High Dose Chemotherapy and Subsequent Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective, Single Centre Analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Karagiannis; Lena Sänger; Winfried Alsdorf; Katja Weisel; Walter Fiedler; Stefan Kluge; Dominic Wichmann; Carsten Bokemeyer; Valentin Fuhrmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Machine learning algorithm to predict mortality in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Min Woo Kang; Jayoun Kim; Dong Ki Kim; Kook-Hwan Oh; Kwon Wook Joo; Yon Su Kim; Seung Seok Han
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Predictors of intensive care unit admission in patients with hematologic malignancy.

Authors:  Abi Vijenthira; Nicholas Chiu; Daniel Jacobson; Zoey Freedman; Matthew C Cheung; Shannon Goddard; Robert Fowler; Rena Buckstein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Scoring Systems in Assessing Survival of Critically Ill ICU Patients.

Authors:  Ana D Sekulic; Sladjana V Trpkovic; Aleksandar P Pavlovic; Olivera M Marinkovic; Aleksandra N Ilic
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-09-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.