Literature DB >> 25078614

Hydraulic performance of a permeable reactive barrier at Casey Station, Antarctica.

K A Mumford1, J L Rayner2, I Snape3, G W Stevens4.   

Abstract

A permeable bio-reactive barrier (PRB) was installed at Casey Station, Antarctica in 2005/06 to intercept, capture and degrade petroleum hydrocarbons from a decade old fuel spill. A funnel and gate configuration was selected and implemented. The reactive gate was split into five separate cells to enable the testing of five different treatment combinations. Although different treatment materials were used in each cell, each treatment combination contained the following reactive zones: a zone for the controlled release of nutrients to enhance degradation, a zone for hydrocarbon capture and enhanced degradation, and a zone to capture excess nutrients. The materials selected for each of these zones had other requirements, these included; not having any adverse impact on the environment, being permeable enough to capture the entire catchment flow, and having sufficient residence time to fully capture migrating hydrocarbons. Over a five year period the performance of the PRB was extensively monitored and evaluated for nutrient concentration, fuel retention and permeability. At the end of the five year test period the material located within the reactive gate was excavated, total petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations present on the material determined and particle size analysis conducted. This work found that although maintaining media reactivity is obviously important, the most critical aspect of PRB performance is preserving the permeability of the barrier itself, in this case by maintaining appropriate particle size distribution. This is particularly important when PRBs are installed in regions that are subject to freeze thaw processes that may result in particle disintegration over time.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Freeze thaw processes; Hydraulics; Permeable reactive barrier; Remediation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25078614     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.06.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of a permeable reactive barrier to capture and degrade hydrocarbon contaminants.

Authors:  K A Mumford; S M Powell; J L Rayner; G Hince; I Snape; G W Stevens
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Bioremediation techniques-classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects.

Authors:  Christopher Chibueze Azubuike; Chioma Blaise Chikere; Gideon Chijioke Okpokwasili
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.312

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.