Parnandi Sridhar1, Sarath Chandra Sistla1, Sheik Manwar Ali1, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Karthikeyan2, Ashok Shankar Badhe3, Palghat Hariharan Ananthanarayanan4. 1. Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. 2. Department of Urology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India. 4. Department of Biochemistry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Perioperative stress response can be detrimental if excessive and prolonged. Intravenous (i.v.) lignocaine, while being an effective analgesic, has the added benefit of anti-inflammatory activity. This study was done to assess the effect of i.v. lignocaine on operative stress response and post-surgical ileusafter elective open abdominal surgeries. METHODS:Patients (n = 134) were randomized into two groups (n = 67 each) to receive an i.v. infusion of lignocaine (group L) or saline (group S) as a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg at intubation followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h throughout the surgery until 1 h post-surgery. Total leukocyte count (TLC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels immediately and 24 h after surgery were compared with preoperative levels. Time to first passage of flatus and stools post-operatively was noted. Post-operative pain scores, analgesic requirements, and incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: Post-operative surge in TLC, CRP and IL-6 was attenuated in group L as compared to group S (P < 0.001, 0.018, <0.001). Time to passage of flatus and stools was earlier in group L (P = 0.04, 0.02). PONV was lesser in group L at 6 and 18 h post-surgery (<0.001, 0.28). Post-operative pain scores and post-operative morphine requirement were significantly less in group L at each point of time post-operatively (P < 0.001, <0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative i.v. lignocaine infusion attenuates the operative stress response, provides effective analgesia and reduces the need for opioids post-operatively. Through these effects, it reduces post-operative ileus and the incidence of PONV.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Perioperative stress response can be detrimental if excessive and prolonged. Intravenous (i.v.) lignocaine, while being an effective analgesic, has the added benefit of anti-inflammatory activity. This study was done to assess the effect of i.v. lignocaine on operative stress response and post-surgical ileus after elective open abdominal surgeries. METHODS:Patients (n = 134) were randomized into two groups (n = 67 each) to receive an i.v. infusion of lignocaine (group L) or saline (group S) as a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg at intubation followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg/kg/h throughout the surgery until 1 h post-surgery. Total leukocyte count (TLC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels immediately and 24 h after surgery were compared with preoperative levels. Time to first passage of flatus and stools post-operatively was noted. Post-operative pain scores, analgesic requirements, and incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: Post-operative surge in TLC, CRP and IL-6 was attenuated in group L as compared to group S (P < 0.001, 0.018, <0.001). Time to passage of flatus and stools was earlier in group L (P = 0.04, 0.02). PONV was lesser in group L at 6 and 18 h post-surgery (<0.001, 0.28). Post-operative pain scores and post-operative morphine requirement were significantly less in group L at each point of time post-operatively (P < 0.001, <0.001). CONCLUSION: Perioperative i.v. lignocaine infusion attenuates the operative stress response, provides effective analgesia and reduces the need for opioids post-operatively. Through these effects, it reduces post-operative ileus and the incidence of PONV.
Authors: J Barr; C Boulind; J D Foster; P Ewings; J Reid; J T Jenkins; B Williams-Yesson; N K Francis Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Francisco De la Gala; Patricia Piñeiro; Almudena Reyes; Carlos Simón; Elena Vara; Lisa Rancan; Luis Javier Huerta; Guillermo Gonzalez; Carmen Benito; Marta Muñoz; Pilar Grande; Sergio D Paredes; Pablo Tomas Aznar; Alvaro Perez; David Martinez; Fernando Higuero; David Sanz; Juan Pedro De Miguel; Patricia Cruz; Luis Olmedilla; Elena Lopez Gil; Patricia Duque; Guillermo Sanchez-Pedrosa; Mayte Valle; Ignacio Garutti Journal: Trials Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Jose M Soliz; Ifeyinwa C Ifeanyi; Mathew H Katz; Jonathan Wilks; Juan P Cata; Thomas McHugh; Jason B Fleming; Lei Feng; Thomas Rahlfs; Morgan Bruno; Vijaya Gottumukkala Journal: Anesth Pain Med Date: 2017-08-21
Authors: Stephanie Weibel; Yvonne Jelting; Nathan L Pace; Antonia Helf; Leopold Hj Eberhart; Klaus Hahnenkamp; Markus W Hollmann; Daniel M Poepping; Alexander Schnabel; Peter Kranke Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-06-04