Literature DB >> 25078261

Toxicity endpoint selections for a simazine risk assessment.

Marilyn Silva1, Poorni Iyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: California uses simazine at one of the highest levels for states in the United States (approximately 2.5 million lbs 2006-2010). Simazine causes neuroendocrine disruption and mammary cancer in test animals. A risk assessment was prioritized by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation because of the nondietary concern for simazine exposure to occupational/nonoccupational simazine users, resident nonusers, and bystanders (especially children and children exhibiting pica) at greatest risk.
METHODS: No observed effect levels (NOELs) from animal studies as well as human exposure data were used to determine nondietary values for the above populations. Registrant-submitted and open literature studies focusing on oral (major human route) effects for simazine and the major metabolites desisopropyl-s-atrazine and diaminochlorotriazine were reviewed as part of the hazard identification process.
RESULTS: Developmental, reproduction, and chronic studies provided the lowest NOELs for the acute (5 mg/kg/day), subchronic (0.56 mg/kg/day), and chronic (0.52 mg/kg/day) exposure durations, respectively. A benchmark dose (95th percentile) was calculated for mammary tumorigenesis, assuming a threshold mechanism in rats (benchmark dose lower limit [95th percentile; BMDL05 ]: 2.9 mg/kg/day). Margins of exposure and uncertainty factors (100-300×, depending on exposure scenario) were used to characterize risk for designated population subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Fetal developmental delays, endocrine disruption, and mammary tumors resulted from simazine treatment. Systemic and maternal/fetal effects determined the critical NOELs used in risk assessment. Margins of exposures for most scenarios were below acceptable levels, especially for children who may be bystanders where simazine is applied and children who exhibit pica. This risk characterization raises a concern for long-term effects in humans.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  developmental; endocrine effects; mammary tumors; reproductive toxicity; risk assessment; simazine; uncertainty factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25078261     DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.21114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 1542-9733


  5 in total

1.  Magnetic partially carbonized cellulose nanocrystal-based magnetic solid phase extraction for the analysis of triazine and triazole pesticides in water.

Authors:  Xiaotong Yi; Chang Liu; Xueke Liu; Peng Wang; Zhiqiang Zhou; Donghui Liu
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Dopaminergic Dysfunction in Mammalian Dopamine Neurons Induced by Simazine Neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Xueting Li; Jia Yu; Jianan Li; Yanping Wu; Baixiang Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Towards Simazine Monitoring in Agro-Zootechnical Productions: A Yeast Cell Bioprobe for Real Samples Screening.

Authors:  Gerardo Grasso; Ludovico Caracciolo; Giulia Cocco; Chiara Frazzoli; Roberto Dragone
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-15

Review 4.  Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Pesticides into Nanocomposites: A Review.

Authors:  Franciele S Bruckmann; Carlos Schnorr; Leandro R Oviedo; Salah Knani; Luis F O Silva; William L Silva; Guilherme L Dotto; Cristiano R Bohn Rhoden
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Differences in GPR30 Regulation by Chlorotriazine Herbicides in Human Breast Cells.

Authors:  Colin P Florian; Shelly R Mansfield; Jennifer R Schroeder
Journal:  Biochem Res Int       Date:  2016-02-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.