J Willem M Nissink1, Sam Blackburn. 1. AstraZeneca, Oncology Innovative Medicines, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, UK.
Abstract
AIM: We mine historical high-throughput data to identify and characterize 'frequent hitters', hits that are potentially false-positive results. BACKGROUND: A key problem in the field of high-throughput screening (HTS) is recognition of frequent hitters, which are false-positive or otherwise anomalous compounds that tend to crop up across many screens. Follow-up of such compounds constitutes a waste of resource and decreases efficiency. METHODOLOGY: We describe a systematic retrospective approach to identify anomalous hitter behavior using historical screening data. We take into account the uncertainty that arises if not enough screen data are available and extend implementation to target and technology classes. CONCLUSION: Use of the descriptor in analyzing high-throughput screen results frees up resource for follow-up of more likely true hits in the downstream hit-deconvolution cascade, thereby increasing efficiency of screen delivery. Although effective, historical data bias can affect the annotation, and we exemplify cases where this happened.
AIM: We mine historical high-throughput data to identify and characterize 'frequent hitters', hits that are potentially false-positive results. BACKGROUND: A key problem in the field of high-throughput screening (HTS) is recognition of frequent hitters, which are false-positive or otherwise anomalous compounds that tend to crop up across many screens. Follow-up of such compounds constitutes a waste of resource and decreases efficiency. METHODOLOGY: We describe a systematic retrospective approach to identify anomalous hitter behavior using historical screening data. We take into account the uncertainty that arises if not enough screen data are available and extend implementation to target and technology classes. CONCLUSION: Use of the descriptor in analyzing high-throughput screen results frees up resource for follow-up of more likely true hits in the downstream hit-deconvolution cascade, thereby increasing efficiency of screen delivery. Although effective, historical data bias can affect the annotation, and we exemplify cases where this happened.
Authors: Anne Mai Wassermann; Eugen Lounkine; Dominic Hoepfner; Gaelle Le Goff; Frederick J King; Christian Studer; John M Peltier; Melissa L Grippo; Vivian Prindle; Jianshi Tao; Ansgar Schuffenhauer; Iain M Wallace; Shanni Chen; Philipp Krastel; Amanda Cobos-Correa; Christian N Parker; John W Davies; Meir Glick Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Jayme L Dahlin; J Willem M Nissink; Subhashree Francis; Jessica M Strasser; Kristen John; Zhiguo Zhang; Michael A Walters Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Jayme L Dahlin; Douglas S Auld; Ina Rothenaigner; Steve Haney; Jonathan Z Sexton; J Willem M Nissink; Jarrod Walsh; Jonathan A Lee; John M Strelow; Francis S Willard; Lori Ferrins; Jonathan B Baell; Michael A Walters; Bruce K Hua; Kamyar Hadian; Bridget K Wagner Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Jayme L Dahlin; J Willem M Nissink; Jessica M Strasser; Subhashree Francis; LeeAnn Higgins; Hui Zhou; Zhiguo Zhang; Michael A Walters Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-02-21 Impact factor: 8.039
Authors: Jonathan Bisson; James B McAlpine; J Brent Friesen; Shao-Nong Chen; James Graham; Guido F Pauli Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 7.446