| Literature DB >> 25077697 |
Heng Li1, Jun Li, Wenhua Sheng, Jinhao Sun, Xiaoli Ma, Xueran Chen, Jianfen Bi, Yong Zhao, Xiaohong Li.
Abstract
We have previously reported a novel CD45-positive cell population called peripheral blood insulin-producing cells (PB-IPCs) and its unique potential for releasing insulin in vitro. Despite the CD45-positive phenotype and self-renewal ability, PB-IPCs are distinguished from hemopoietic and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) by some characteristics, such as a CD34-negative phenotype and different culture conditions. We have further identified the gene profiles of the embryonic and neural stem cells, and these profiles include Sox2, Nanog, c-Myc, Klf4, Notch1 and Mash1. After treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in vitro, most PB-IPCs exhibited morphological changes that included the development of elongated and branched cell processes. In the process of induction, the mRNA expression of Hes1 was robustly upregulated, and a majority of cells acquired some astrocyte-associated specific phenotypes including anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), CD44, Glutamate-aspartate transporter (GLAST) and S100β. In spite of the deficiency of glutamate uptaking, the differentiated cells significantly relaxed the regulation of the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mRNA. This finding demonstrates that PB-IPCs could be induced into a population of astrocyte-like cells and enhanced the neurotrophic potential when the state of proliferation was limited by ATRA, which implies that this unique CD45+ cell pool may have a protective role in some degenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS).Entities:
Keywords: all-trans retinoic acid; astrocytes; differentiation; human peripheral blood; insulin-producing cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25077697 PMCID: PMC4410680 DOI: 10.1002/cbin.10355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Biol Int ISSN: 1065-6995 Impact factor: 3.612
Primers pairs used for real-time polymerase chain reaction
| Gene | Accession number/position | Primer sequence | Predicted Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| c-Myc | NM_002467.4, +511/+646 | 5′ GCAGCTGCTTAGACGCTGGA 3′ | 136 bp |
| 5′ CGCAGTAGAAATACGGCTGCAC 3′ | |||
| K1f-4 | NM_004235.4, +1819/+1909 | 5′ AAGAGTTCCCATCTCAAGGCACA 3′ | 91 bp |
| 5′ GGGCGAATTTCCATCCACAG 3′ | |||
| Nanog | NM_024865.2, +603/+772 | 5′ CAACATCCTGAACCTCAGCTACAA 3′ | 170 bp |
| 5′ GGCATCCCTGGTGGTAGGAA 3′ | |||
| Sox2 | NM_003106.3, +1041/+1122 | 5′ GTGAGCGCCCTGCAGTACAA3′ | 82 bp |
| 5′ GCGAGTAGGACATGCTGTAGGTG 3′ | |||
| Mash1 | NM_004316.3, +804/+902 | 5′ GTCACAAGTCAGCGCCCAAG 3′ | 99 bp |
| 5′ TGTAGCCAAAGCCGCTGAAG3′ | |||
| Notch1 | NM_017617.3, +6118/+6273 | 5′ AATGTGGATGCCGCAGTTG 3′ | 156 bp |
| 5′ ATCCGTGATGTCCCGGTTG 3′ | |||
| Ngn1 | NM_006161.2, +1383/+1524 | 5′ TTTGAGCCGGCTGACAATACA 3′ | 142 bp |
| 5′ CTGTGCCTGAATAGCTAAGCAAGAG 3′ | |||
| Ngn2 | NM_024019.3, +1243/+1384 | 5′ CCTGGAAACCATCTCACTTCACA 3′ | 142 bp |
| 5′ TTGGCTTTGACAATAAGCTCCATC 3′ | |||
| Oligo1 | NM_138983.2, +1088/+1174 | 5′ TGGGACGTTAAAGTGACCAGAG3′ | 87 bp |
| 5′ TCTCCCTAAAGOCGCTGGA 3′ | |||
| Oligo2 | NM_005806.3, +1703/+1787 | 5′ GGGCCACMGTTAGTTGGAAG 3′ | 85 bp |
| 5′ GTGTGGATTGACCCAGATATTGA 3′ | |||
| Hes1 | NM_005524.3, +473/+559 | 5′ GGACATTCTGGAAATGACAGTGA 3′ | 87 bp |
| 5′AGCACACTTGGGTCTGTGCTC 3′ | |||
| GFAP | NM_001131019.2, +476/+610 | 5′ TGGAGGTTGAGAGGGACAATCTG 3′ | 135 bp |
| 5′ CCAGGGTGGCTTCATCTGCT 3′ | |||
| BDNF | NM_001143805.1, +2828/+2954 | 5′ GTCAAGTTGGGAGCCTGAAATAGTG 3′ | 127 bp |
| 5′ AGGATGCTGGTCC A AGTGGTG 3′ | |||
| GDNF | NM_000514.3, +3308/+3387 | 5′ ACACTGTCTTGGGATCTTGCTGA 3′ | 80 bp |
| 5′ TGCTCCACGAATGACTGGATG 3′ | |||
| NGF | NM_002506.2, +75/+197 | 5′ ATGCTGGACCCAAGCTCA 3′ | 123 bp |
| 5′ TGATCAGAGTGTAGAACAACATGGA 3′ | |||
| β-actin | NM_001101.3, +1043/+1228 | 5′ CACCCAGCACAATGAA 3′ | 183 bp |
| 5′ CTAAGTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA 3′ |
Figure 1Morphological changes of PB-IPCs under the treatment with ATRA
In the Control (A) and 1 μM ATRA (B) group, most cells (>90%) maintained the original appearances of PBIPCs. (C): Apparent morphological changes of elongated and branched cell processes were observed in PB-IPCs under the treatment with 5 μM ATRA at the 9th day. (D): In the 10 μM ATRA group, the induced cells displayed more significant morphological changes, and some cells exhibited the typical star-shape of astrocytes (indicated by black arrows).
Figure 2Exposure to ATRA increased the expression level of GFAP phenotype of PB-IPCs
At day 14 in the Control (A) and 1 μM ATRA (B) group, immunocytochemical analysis revealed that the GFAP+ cells accounted for only 19 ± 4% and 35 ± 4% independently. In the 5 μM (C) and 10 μM (D) ATRA group, a majority of neural-like cells were stained for the GFAP marker by 71 ± 6% and 76 ± 6% independently. (E): By statistical analysis of counting data, there is no significant difference in the percentage of GFAP+ cells between the 5 and 10 μM ATRA group (P = 0.2). The differences among the 1, 5 μM ATRA and Control groups were significant (P < 0.01*). Data represented one of three experiments.
Figure 3Confocal microscopy analysis of the expressions of astrocytic specific markers for PB-IPCs in the 10 μM
ATRA and Control group (A, B): At day 14 in the 10 μM ATRA group, a majority of GFAP+ cells made a positive expression of the GLAST marker (90 ± 7%) and CD44 marker (55 ± 8%), while in the Control group, the CD44 marker was expressed in the minority of cells (29 ± 3%) and the expression of GLAST was just at a background level. (C): Both all of the induced and uninduced cells made an obvious immunofluorescent expression of the S100β marker. Data were representative of three sample preparations. Scale bar, 100 μm.
Gene expression of se“eral pluripotentiality-associated, bHLH and neurotrophic factors and GFAP at day 0 and 6
| PB-IPCs | iPB-IPCs | uPB-IPCs | iPB-IPCs “s. uPB-IPCs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 6 | Day 6 | Day 6 | ||||||
| Primer | Mean Ct (SD) | Delta Ct | Mean Ct (SD) | Delta Ct | Fold change (SD) | Mean Ct (SD) | Delta Ct | Fold change (SD) | |
| Nanog | 27.8 (0.05) | 14.0 | 30.4 (0.13) | 16.9 | 0.1 (0.01) | 28.3 (0.89) | 14.8 | 0.6 (0.04) | |
| c-Myc | 18.6 (0.08) | 5.1 | 19.4 (0.07) | 5.8 | 0.6 (0.03) | 19.3 (0.12) | 5.8 | 0.6 (0.05) | |
| K1f4 | 23.6 (0.14) | 9.9 | 25.6 (0.19) | 12.1 | 0.2 (0.03) | 23.9 (0.17) | 10.4 | 0.7 (0.08) | |
| Sox2 | 25.5 (0.47) | 11.8 | 28.2 (0.76) | 14.7 | 0.2 (0.08) | 27.2 (0.03) | 13.6 | 0.3 (0.01) | |
| Notch1 | 25.0 (0.07) | 11.2 | 28.6 (0.50) | 15.1 | 0.1 (0.03) | 27.2 (0.03) | 13.7 | 0.2 (0.01) | |
| Mash1 | 36.6 (0.24) | 22.9 | 36.1 (0.43) | 22.6 | 1.3 (0.38) | 35.5 (0.12) | 21.3 | 1.9 (0.16) | |
| Ngn1 | N/A | N/A | 36.5 (0.39) | 22.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Ngn2 | 29.6 (0.47) | 15.9 | 29.4 (0.27) | 15.9 | 1.0 (0.19) | 30.7 (0.62) | 17.2 | 0.4 (0.18) | |
| Oligo1 | NA | NA | 38.7 (0.38) | 25.2 | N/A | 37.7 (0.79) | 24.2 | N/A | N/A |
| Oligo2 | 30.3 (0.01) | 16.6 | 28.0 (0.05) | 14.6 | 4.0 (0.15) | 30.6 (0.08) | 17.0 | 0.7 (0.04) | |
| Hes1 | 28.7 (0.42) | 15.0 | 24.8 (0.24) | 11.3 | 12.9 (2.16) | 27.8 (0.37) | 14.3 | 1.6 (0.40) | |
| GFAP | 29.0 (0.29) | 15.3 | 27.6 (0.03) | 14.1 | 2.3 (0.04) | 31.3 (0.16) | 17.8 | 0.2 (0.02) | |
| BDNF | 28.1 (0.22) | 14.4 | 25.1 (0.05) | 11.6 | 7.0 (1.92) | 27.0 (0.34) | 13.5 | 1.9 (0.48) | |
| GDNF | 32.5 (0.17) | 18.8 | 32.2 (0.18) | 18.7 | 1.1 (0.14) | 33.8 (0.12) | 20.3 | 0.4 (0.03) | |
| NGF | N/A | N/A | 35.4 (0.10) | 21.9 | N/A | 35.6 (0.75) | 22.1 | N/A | N/A |
N/A: not applicable; iPB-IPCs: induced PB-lPGs; uPB-IPCs: uninduced PB-IPCs; SD: Standard Deviation.
Figure 4Real-time PCR analyses of Hes1, Oligo2, Ngn2 and BDNF mRNA expression in the process of induction
(A) ATRA induced PB-IPCs to express of Hes1 by the 3rd day (P < 0.01, compared to the Control group), exhibit a robust lack of regulation on the 6th day (P < 0.01, compared to the 3rd day), then maintain a stable expression on day 9 (P = 0.46, compared to the 6th day). In the Control group, the expression of Hes1 mRNA by the PB-IPCs was relatively stable in the process of culturing non-induced cells (P = 0.03, the 6th vs. 3rd day; P = 0.78, the 9th vs. 6th day). (B) The expression of Oligo2 was, to some extent, upregulated comparedto the Control group at the 6th and 9th days (P < 0.01). (C) The induced PB-IPCs expressed BDNF in an unregulated manner compared to the Control group (P < 0.01 for the 6th and 9th days). (D) There were no significant differences in Ngn2 expression between the induced and non-induced cells (P = 0.023 on the 3rdday, P = 0.04 on the 6th day and P = 0.09 on the 9th day). The experiments were repeated in triplicate. Student's t-tests were used for statistical analyses.