Literature DB >> 25077492

A comparison of sperm RNA-seq methods.

Shihong Mao1, Edward Sendler, Robert J Goodrich, Russ Hauser, Stephen A Krawetz.   

Abstract

A significant challenge to the effective application of RNA-seq to the complete transcript analysis of low quantity and/or degraded samples is the amplification of minimal input RNA to enable sequencing library construction. Several strategies have been commercialized in order to facilitate this goal. However, each strategy has its own specific protocols and methodology, and each may introduce unique bias and in some cases show specific preference for a collection of sequences. Our wider investigation of human spermatozoal RNAs was able to reveal their complexity despite being generally characterized by low quantity and high fragmentation. In this study, the following four commercially available RNA-seq amplification and library protocols for the preparation of low quantity/highly fragmented samples, SMARTer™ Ultra Low RNA (SU) for Illumina® Sequencing, SeqPlex RNA Amplification (SP), Ovation® RNA-Seq System V2 (OR), and Ovation® RNA-Seq Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded System (FFPES) were assessed using human sperm RNAs. Further investigation analyzed the effects on the end results of two different library preparation methods, Encore NGS Multiplex System I (Enc) and Ovation Ultralow Library Systems (UL), that appeared best suited to this type of RNA, along with other potential confounding factors such as FFPE preservation. Our results indicate that for each library preparation protocol, the differences in the initial amount of input RNA and choice of RNA purification step do not generate marked differences in terms of RNA profiling. However, substantial disparity is introduced by individual amplification methods prior to library construction. These significant differences may be caused by the different priming methods or amplification strategies used in each of the four different protocols examined. The observation of intra-sample variation introduced by the choice of protocol highlights the role that external factors play in planning and subsequent reliable interpretation of results of any RNA-seq experiment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Library preparation; RNA purification; reverse transcription and cDNA amplification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25077492      PMCID: PMC4435722          DOI: 10.3109/19396368.2014.944318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med        ISSN: 1939-6368            Impact factor:   3.061


  22 in total

Review 1.  RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fatih Ozsolak; Patrice M Milos
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Paternal contribution: new insights and future challenges.

Authors:  Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Spermatozoal RNA profiles of normal fertile men.

Authors:  G Charles Ostermeier; David J Dix; David Miller; Purvesh Khatri; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Designing prospective cohort studies for assessing reproductive and developmental toxicity during sensitive windows of human reproduction and development--the LIFE Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Enrique F Schisterman; Anne M Sweeney; Timothy C Wilcosky; Robert E Gore-Langton; Courtney D Lynch; Dana Boyd Barr; Steven M Schrader; Sungduk Kim; Zhen Chen; Rajeshwari Sundaram
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Digital transcriptome profiling from attomole-level RNA samples.

Authors:  Fatih Ozsolak; Alon Goren; Melissa Gymrek; Mitchell Guttman; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein; Patrice M Milos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 6.  The presence, role and clinical use of spermatozoal RNAs.

Authors:  Meritxell Jodar; Sellappan Selvaraju; Edward Sendler; Michael P Diamond; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Success and failure in human spermatogenesis as revealed by teratozoospermic RNAs.

Authors:  Adrian E Platts; David J Dix; Hector E Chemes; Kary E Thompson; Robert Goodrich; John C Rockett; Vanesa Y Rawe; Silvina Quintana; Michael P Diamond; Lillian F Strader; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  A comparison of single molecule and amplification based sequencing of cancer transcriptomes.

Authors:  Lee T Sam; Doron Lipson; Tal Raz; Xuhong Cao; John Thompson; Patrice M Milos; Dan Robinson; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Christopher A Maher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Whole-transcriptome RNAseq analysis from minute amount of total RNA.

Authors:  Muhammad A Tariq; Hyunsung J Kim; Olufisayo Jejelowo; Nader Pourmand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Absence of sperm RNA elements correlates with idiopathic male infertility.

Authors:  Meritxell Jodar; Edward Sendler; Sergey I Moskovtsev; Clifford L Librach; Robert Goodrich; Sonja Swanson; Russ Hauser; Michael P Diamond; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 2.  RNA sequencing as a powerful tool in searching for genes influencing health and performance traits of horses.

Authors:  Monika Stefaniuk; Katarzyna Ropka-Molik
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  An Efficient Approach for RNA Extraction from Boar Sperm and Seminal Plasma.

Authors:  Vanmathy R Kasimanickam; Ramanathan K Kasimanickam
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-07-05

4.  Chromatin and extracellular vesicle associated sperm RNAs.

Authors:  Graham D Johnson; Paula Mackie; Meritxell Jodar; Sergey Moskovtsev; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  De Novo RNA Sequencing and Transcriptome Analysis of Monascus purpureus and Analysis of Key Genes Involved in Monacolin K Biosynthesis.

Authors:  Chan Zhang; Jian Liang; Le Yang; Baoguo Sun; Chengtao Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spermatozoal large RNA content is associated with semen characteristics, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.

Authors:  Enrica Bianchi; Kim Boekelheide; Mark Sigman; Joseph M Braun; Melissa Eliot; Susan J Hall; Edward Dere; Kathleen Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nuclease Footprints in Sperm Project Past and Future Chromatin Regulatory Events.

Authors:  Graham D Johnson; Meritxell Jodar; Roger Pique-Regi; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  SpermBase: A Database for Sperm-Borne RNA Contents.

Authors:  Andrew Schuster; Chong Tang; Yeming Xie; Nicole Ortogero; Shuiqiao Yuan; Wei Yan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Spermatozoa From High- and Low-Fertile Crossbred Bulls: Implications for Fertility Prediction.

Authors:  Mani Arul Prakash; Arumugam Kumaresan; John Peter Ebenezer Samuel King; Pradeep Nag; Ankur Sharma; Manish Kumar Sinha; Elango Kamaraj; Tirtha Kumar Datta
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-10

10.  Sperm Transcripts Associated With Odorant Binding and Olfactory Transduction Pathways Are Altered in Breeding Bulls Producing Poor-Quality Semen.

Authors:  Thirumalaisamy Karuthadurai; Dayal Nitai Das; Arumugam Kumaresan; Manish Kumar Sinha; Elango Kamaraj; Pradeep Nag; John Peter Ebenezer Samuel King; Tirtha Kumar Datta; Ayyasamy Manimaran; Sakthivel Jeyakumar; Kerekoppa Ramesha
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.