BACKGROUND: The International Consensus Guidelines (ICG) stratify risk for malignancy in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) into three progressive categories according to whether patients show 'no criteria', 'worrisome features' (WFs) or 'high-risk stigmata' (HRS). OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that type (clinical versus radiological) and quantity of ICG WFs and HRS carry unequal weight and are not cumulative in the prediction of risk for malignancy or invasiveness in IPMN. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent surgical resection for IPMN at a single, university-based medical centre during 1992-2012 was performed. Differences that achieved a P-value of <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of 362 patients, 340 were eligible for entry into the study and were categorized as demonstrating no criteria (n = 70), WFs (n = 185) or HRS (n = 85). Patients in the WFs group had higher rates of malignant and invasive IPMN than those in the no-criteria group [26.5% versus 4.3% (P < 0.0001) and 15.7% versus 4.3% (P = 0.02), respectively]. Patients in the HRS group had higher rates of malignant and invasive IPMN than those in the WFs group [56.5% versus 26.5% (P = 0.0001) and 42.4% versus 15.7% (P = 0.0001), respectively]. When radiological parameters only were considered for WFs versus HRS, no difference was found in rates of malignant or invasive IPMN. By contrast, when clinical parameters only were considered, patients in the HRS group had higher rates of malignant or invasive IPMN [66.7% versus 8.1% (P = 0.04) and 66.7% versus 2.7% (P = 0.01), respectively]. There was no stepwise increase in rates of malignant or invasive IPMN with the number of WFs. However, patients with only one WF had a lower risk for malignancy than patients with two or more WFs. CONCLUSIONS: The type and quantity of ICG WFs and HRS carry unequal weight and are not cumulative in the prediction of risk for malignancy or invasiveness in IPMN.
BACKGROUND: The International Consensus Guidelines (ICG) stratify risk for malignancy in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) into three progressive categories according to whether patients show 'no criteria', 'worrisome features' (WFs) or 'high-risk stigmata' (HRS). OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that type (clinical versus radiological) and quantity of ICG WFs and HRS carry unequal weight and are not cumulative in the prediction of risk for malignancy or invasiveness in IPMN. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent surgical resection for IPMN at a single, university-based medical centre during 1992-2012 was performed. Differences that achieved a P-value of <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of 362 patients, 340 were eligible for entry into the study and were categorized as demonstrating no criteria (n = 70), WFs (n = 185) or HRS (n = 85). Patients in the WFs group had higher rates of malignant and invasive IPMN than those in the no-criteria group [26.5% versus 4.3% (P < 0.0001) and 15.7% versus 4.3% (P = 0.02), respectively]. Patients in the HRS group had higher rates of malignant and invasive IPMN than those in the WFs group [56.5% versus 26.5% (P = 0.0001) and 42.4% versus 15.7% (P = 0.0001), respectively]. When radiological parameters only were considered for WFs versus HRS, no difference was found in rates of malignant or invasive IPMN. By contrast, when clinical parameters only were considered, patients in the HRS group had higher rates of malignant or invasive IPMN [66.7% versus 8.1% (P = 0.04) and 66.7% versus 2.7% (P = 0.01), respectively]. There was no stepwise increase in rates of malignant or invasive IPMN with the number of WFs. However, patients with only one WF had a lower risk for malignancy than patients with two or more WFs. CONCLUSIONS: The type and quantity of ICG WFs and HRS carry unequal weight and are not cumulative in the prediction of risk for malignancy or invasiveness in IPMN.
Authors: B Terris; P Ponsot; F Paye; P Hammel; A Sauvanet; G Molas; P Bernades; J Belghiti; P Ruszniewski; J F Fléjou Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Camilo Correa-Gallego; Richard Do; Jennifer Lafemina; Mithat Gonen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; T Peter Kingham; Murray F Brennan; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Roberto Salvia; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Claudio Bassi; Sarah P Thayer; Massimo Falconi; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kristine S Spinelli; Travis E Fromwiller; Roger A Daniel; James M Kiely; Attila Nakeeb; Richard A Komorowski; Stuart D Wilson; Henry A Pitt Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: C Max Schmidt; Patrick B White; Joshua A Waters; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Oscar W Cummings; Marshall Baker; Thomas J Howard; Nicholas J Zyromski; Atilla Nakeeb; John M DeWitt; Fatih M Akisik; Stuart Sherman; Henry A Pitt; Keith D Lillemoe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mario Pelaez-Luna; Suresh T Chari; Thomas C Smyrk; Naoki Takahashi; Jonathan E Clain; Michael J Levy; Randall K Pearson; Bret T Petersen; Mark D Topazian; Santhi S Vege; Michael Kendrick; Michael B Farnell Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-17