| Literature DB >> 25077057 |
Amira M Embaby1, Aliaa A Masoud2, Heba S Marey3, Nadia Z Shaban2, Tayssir M Ghonaim2.
Abstract
The current study underlines biotechnological valorization of the accumulated and the non-efficiently utilized agro-industrial orange peel waste to produce polygalacturonase (PGase), an industrially important enzyme with augmented demands in enzymes markets, from Bacillus licheniformis SHG10. Sequential statistical optimization of PGase production was performed through one variable at a time (OVAT) approach, Plackett-Burman (PB) and response surface methodology (RSM). The impact of introduction of six raw agro-industrial wastes (orange, lemon, banana, pomegranate, artichoke peel wastes and wheat bran) and other synthetic carbon sources separately into the fermentation broth on PGase productivity was studied through OVAT approach. Orange peel waste as sole raw carbon source in basal medium proved to be the best PGase inducer. It promoted PGase productivity with relative specific activity of 166% comparable with the effect imposed by synthetic citrus pectin as a reference inducer. Three key determinants (orange peel waste, pH of the production medium and incubation temperature) had RSM optimal levels of 1.76% (w/v), 8.0 and 37.8°C, respectively along with maximal PGase level (2.69 μg galacturonic acid. min(-1). mg(-1)) within 48 hrs. Moreover, SHG10 PGase exhibited activity over a wide range of pH (3-11) and an optimal activity at 50°C. Data greatly encourage pilot scale PGase production from B. licheniformis SHG10.Entities:
Keywords: Alkaline polygalacturonase; Bacillus licheniformis SHG10; Low cost effective co-inducer/sole carbon source and statistical sequential optimization; Raw orange peel waste
Year: 2014 PMID: 25077057 PMCID: PMC4112199 DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Agro-industrial wastes and some synthetic carbon sources as PGase inducers
| Parameter | Relative specific activity (%) a,b |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Orange peel waste |
|
| Lemon peel waste | 133.56 |
| Banana peel waste | 105.80 |
| Artichoke peel waste | 55.17 |
| Pomegranate peel waste | 53.59 |
|
| |
| Citrus pectin (0.5% w/v) | 100.00 |
| Wheat bran (0.5% w/v) | 102.00 |
| Wheat bran (1% w/v) | 92.00 |
| Glucose (0.5% w/v) | 41.82 |
| Fructose (0.5% w/v) | 64.10 |
| Maltose (0.5% w/v) | 33.01 |
| Xylose (0.5% w/v) | 59.04 |
| Sucrose (0.5% w/v) | 25.60 |
| Glycerol (0.5% w/v) | 27.59 |
| Peptone (0.5% w/v) | 33.42 |
| Peptone (1% w/v) | 50.20 |
| Beef extract (0.5% w/v) | 14.11 |
| Beef extract (1% w/v) | 14.11 |
| Tryptone (0.5% w/v) | 39.45 |
| Tryptone (1% w/v) | 28.72 |
aSpecific activity (U/mg) was determined as μg galacturonic acid .min-1. mg protein-1.
bAll relative specific activities of PGase were related to U/mg PGase obtained upon using citrus pectin – based basal medium as production medium.
Effect of some medium supplements in citrus pectin based- mineral medium on PGase productivity
| Parameter | Relative specific activity (%) a,b |
|---|---|
| Control mediumc | 100.00 |
|
| |
| NaN03 | 145.00 |
| KN03 | 163.80 |
| MgS04 | 237.70 |
| CaCl2 | 198.80 |
| FeS04 | 228.57 |
| (NH4)2S04 | 103.60 |
| NH4Cl | 72.41 |
|
| 60.21 |
aSpecific activity (U/mg): calculated as μg galacturonic acid .min-1. mg protein-1.
bAll relative specific activities of PGase were related to U/mg PGase obtained upon using citrus pectin –based basal medium as production medium.
cCitrus pectin based- basal medium composition as mentioned in materials and methods.
PBD with coded levels of ten independent variables and experimental vs. predicted PGase values
| Trial# | X 1 | X 2 | X 3 | X 4 | X5 | X 6 | X 7 | X 8 | X 9 | X 10 | Y (PGase) (U/mL) c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp a. | Pred b. | |||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0.1585 |
| 2 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1.60 | 1.6135 |
| 3 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.64 | 1.0695 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0.15 | 0.0195 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 2.70 | 2.3865 |
| 6 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.00 | -0.5795 |
| 7 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 |
| 2.6755 |
| 8 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0.62 | 1.0835 |
| 9 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.1175 |
| 10 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 0.78 | 0.5935 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1.04 | 1.0895 |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0.24 | -0.0305 |
| 13 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.4895 |
| 14 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0.15 | -0.0145 |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1.37 | 1.1425 |
| 16 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1.94 | 2.0235 |
| 17 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 2.58 | 2.6325 |
| 18 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 0.00 | 0.1875 |
| 19 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0.27 | 0.3635 |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0.49 | 0.5885 |
aExperimental values, bpredicted values, U/mL: calculated as μg galacturonic acid.min-1.mL-1.
X1: orange peel waste, X2: NaNO3, X3: MgSO4, X4: CaCl2, X5: FeSO4, X6: KNO3, X7: pH, X8: inoculum size, X9: incubation temperature and X10: incubation time.
Real-coded values of ten independent variables and regression analysis for PGase optimization by PBD
| Variable | Low level | High level | Main effect |
| P-value | t-value | % confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | +1 | ||||||
|
| 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.513 | 0.2565 |
| 2.796274 |
|
| NaNO3 (% w/v) | 0.1 | 0.4 | -0.083 | -0.0415 | 0.661675 | -0.45242 | 33.84 |
| MgSO4 (% w/v) | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.261 | 0.1305 | 0.188555 | 1.422666 | 81.15 |
| CaCl2 (% w/v) | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.255 | 0.1275 | 0.197956 | 1.389961 | 80.21 |
| FeSO4 (% w/v) | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.179 | 0.0895 | 0.354709 | 0.975698 | 63.53 |
| KNO3 (% w/v) | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.037 | 0.0185 | 0.844651 | 0.201681 | 15.45 |
|
| 6.0 | 9.0 | 1.501 | 0.7505 |
| 8.181689 |
|
| Inoculum size (% v/v) | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0.215 | 0.1075 | 0.271314 | 1.171928 | 72.87 |
|
| 37.0 | 50.0 | -0.811 | -0.4055 |
| -4.42062 |
|
| Incubation time (hrs) | 24.0 | 60.0 | -0.245 | -0.1225 | 0.214517 | -1.33545 | 78.55 |
*Significant P-value <0.05 & R2 = 0.93 & Adjusted R2 = 0.83 and P -value for the model = 0.000869.
Figure 1Pareto-Chart in descending layout for PB parameter estimates of ten tested independent variables.
Box-Behnken design of three independent variables and experimental vs. predicted PGase values
| Trial# | X 1 | X 7 | X 9 | Y (PGase) (U/mg) c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp a. | Pred b. | ||||
| 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0.85 | 0.767 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 2.03 | 2.052 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 2.27 | 2.247 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.15 | 1.232 |
| 5 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 1.79 | 1.708 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 2.22 | 2.033 |
| 7 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0.88 | 1.066 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.93 | 1.011 |
| 9 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0.823 | 0.987 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1.17 | 1.273 |
| 11 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0.215 | 0.111 |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.65 | 0.485 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.48 | 2.640 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.68 | 2.640 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.76 | 2.640 |
aExperimental values.
bPredicted values.
U/mg: calculated as μg galacturonic acid.min-1.mg-1.
X1: orange peel waste percent, X7: pH of the production medium and X9: incubation temperature.
Real–coded values of independent variables and regression analysis for PGase optimization by Box-Behnken
| Variable | Low level | Middle level | High level | Model term | Main effect |
| t-value | P-value | % confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 0 | +1 | |||||||
| Orange peel waste (w/v %) | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | X1 | 0.135 | 0.0675 | 0.92151 | 0.399067 | 60.10 |
| pH | 6.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 | X7 | 0.3306 | 0.16525 | 2.255994 | 0.073721 | 92.63 |
| Incubation temp. °C | 30.0 | 40.0 | 50.0 | X9 | -0.832 | -0.416 | -5.67923 |
|
|
| X1 2 | -0.325 | -0.16225 | -1.50482 | 0.192706 | 80.73 | ||||
| X7 2 | -1.805 | -0.90275 | -8.37274 |
|
| ||||
| X9 3 | -2.044 | -1.02275 | -9.48571 |
|
| ||||
| X1.X7 | -1.15 | -0.575 | -5.55072 |
|
| ||||
| X1.X9 | -0.19 | -0.095 | -0.91708 | 0.401174 | 60.00 | ||||
| X7.X9 | 0.044 | 0.022 | 0.212375 | 0.840201 | 16.00 |
*Significant P-value <0.05 & R2 = 0.977 & Adjusted R2 = 0.93 and P -value for the model = 0.0013.
Figure 2Contour surface plot for the dependent variable PGase vs. the independent variables; orange peel waste and pH of the production medium.
Figure 3Contour surface plot for the dependent variable PGase vs. the independent variables; orange peel waste and incubation temperature.
Figure 4Contour surface plot for the dependent variable PGase vs. the independent variables; pH of the production medium and incubation temperature.
Figure 5Effect of different pH(s) [A] and temperature degrees [B] on the activity of PGase SHG10.