Literature DB >> 25076474

Artificial tears alone versus 0.45% ketorolac tromethamine with artificial tears for the treatment of acute viral conjunctivitis.

Adriana Falcão Veloso Lyra1, Lílian Correia Bastos1, Raquel Coelho de Souza Lima1, Lúcio de Vieira Leite Maranhão1, Tiago Eugênio Arantes1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of preservative-free 0.45% ketorolac tromethamine and artificial tears (carboxymethylcellulose) compared with those of preservative-free artificial tears alone on the symptoms and signs of acute viral conjunctivitis.
METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked clinical trial that included 50 patients who were diagnosed with acute viral conjunctivitis and distributed into two groups (Group 0: artificial tears and Group 1: 0.45% ketorolac tromethamine + carboxymethylcellulose). The patients were instructed to use the medication 4 times daily. Signs (conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, follicles, and secretion) and symptoms (general ocular discomfort, itching, foreign body sensation, tearing, redness, and swelling of the eyelids) were scored at baseline and on the third and seventh days of treatment using a standardized questionnaire and slitlamp anterior segment examination.
RESULTS: Both groups showed an improvement in the signs and symptoms of conjunctivitis in their follow-up visits. There was no significant difference in symptom and sign scores between Group 0 and Group 1 in the study visits (p>0.05). The frequency of side effects during treatment was similar between groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that 0.45% ketorolac tromethamine was not superior to the use of artificial tears in relieving the signs and symptoms of viral conjunctivitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25076474     DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol        ISSN: 0004-2749            Impact factor:   0.872


  3 in total

Review 1.  Topical pharmacologic interventions versus placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  Su-Hsun Liu; Barbara S Hawkins; Sueko M Ng; Mark Ren; Louis Leslie; Genie Han; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-03

2.  Epidemiology and molecular diagnosis of acute conjunctivitis in patients attending Hamadan, west Iran ophthalmology clinics 2016-2017.

Authors:  Mohamad Mehdi Johari Moghadam; Milad Mohamad Yari; Farid Azizi Jalilian; Razieh Amini; Nooshin Bazzazi
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2019-10-15

3.  Comparative study on the efficacy of non-steroidal, steroid and non-use of anti-inflammatory in the treatment of acute epidemic conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Luiz Alfredo Santiago; Jussara Matyelle Rodrigues da Silva; Orleâncio Gomes Ripardo de Azevedo; Paulo Roberto Leitão de Vasconcelos
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 1.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.