Shelby Resnick1, Kenji Inaba1, Efstathios Karamanos1, Martin Pham2, Saskya Byerly1, Peep Talving1, Sravanthi Reddy3, Megan Linnebur1, Demetrios Demetriades1. 1. Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles. 3. Department of Radiology, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: A missed cervical spine (CS) injury can have devastating consequences. When CS injuries cannot be ruled out clinically using the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria because of either a neurologic deficit or pain, the optimal imaging modality for CS clearance remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for CS clearance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 1, 2010, through May 31, 2011, at a level I trauma center. Participants included 830 adults who were awake, alert, and able to be examined who experienced blunt trauma with resultant midline CS tenderness and/or neurologic deficits and were undergoing CT of the CS. Initial examinations, all CS imaging results, interventions, and final CS diagnoses were documented. The criterion standard for the sensitivity and specificity calculations was final diagnosis of CS injury at the time of discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinically significant CS injuries, defined as injuries requiring surgical stabilization or halo placement. RESULTS: Overall, 164 CS injuries (19.8%) were diagnosed, and 23 of these (2.8%) were clinically significant. All clinically significant injuries were detected by CT. Fifteen of 681 patients (2.2%) with a normal CT scan had a newly identified finding on MRI; however, none of the injuries required surgical intervention or halo placement. There was no change in management on the basis of MRI findings. The sensitivity and specificity of CT for detecting CS injury was 90.9% and 100%, respectively. For clinically significant CS injuries, the sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Computed tomography is effective in the detection of clinically significant CS injuries in adults deemed eligible for evaluation who had a neurologic deficit or CS pain. Magnetic resonance imaging does not provide any additional clinically relevant information.
IMPORTANCE: A missed cervical spine (CS) injury can have devastating consequences. When CS injuries cannot be ruled out clinically using the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study low-risk criteria because of either a neurologic deficit or pain, the optimal imaging modality for CS clearance remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for CS clearance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 1, 2010, through May 31, 2011, at a level I trauma center. Participants included 830 adults who were awake, alert, and able to be examined who experienced blunt trauma with resultant midline CS tenderness and/or neurologic deficits and were undergoing CT of the CS. Initial examinations, all CS imaging results, interventions, and final CS diagnoses were documented. The criterion standard for the sensitivity and specificity calculations was final diagnosis of CS injury at the time of discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinically significant CS injuries, defined as injuries requiring surgical stabilization or halo placement. RESULTS: Overall, 164 CS injuries (19.8%) were diagnosed, and 23 of these (2.8%) were clinically significant. All clinically significant injuries were detected by CT. Fifteen of 681 patients (2.2%) with a normal CT scan had a newly identified finding on MRI; however, none of the injuries required surgical intervention or halo placement. There was no change in management on the basis of MRI findings. The sensitivity and specificity of CT for detecting CS injury was 90.9% and 100%, respectively. For clinically significant CS injuries, the sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Computed tomography is effective in the detection of clinically significant CS injuries in adults deemed eligible for evaluation who had a neurologic deficit or CS pain. Magnetic resonance imaging does not provide any additional clinically relevant information.
Authors: Kenji Inaba; Saskya Byerly; Lisa D Bush; Matthew J Martin; David T Martin; Kimberly A Peck; Galinos Barmparas; Matthew J Bradley; Joshua P Hazelton; Raul Coimbra; Asad J Choudhry; Carlos V R Brown; Chad G Ball; Jill R Cherry-Bukowiec; Clay Cothren Burlew; Bellal Joseph; Julie Dunn; Christian T Minshall; Matthew M Carrick; Gina M Berg; Demetrios Demetriades Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Anne M Murray; Fang-Chi Hsu; Jeff D Williamson; R Nick Bryan; Hertzel C Gerstein; Mark D Sullivan; Michael E Miller; Iris Leng; Laura L Lovato; Lenore J Launer Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: James M Elliott; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Charles Hazle; Mark A Hoggarth; Jacob McPherson; Cheryl L Sparks; Kenneth A Weber Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Matthias K Jung; Lukas Hörnig; Michael M A Stübs; Paul A Grützner; Michael Kreinest Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Mohamed A Mohamed; Karl D Majeske; Gul Sachwani-Daswani; Daniel Coffey; Karim M Elghawy; Amanda Pham; Donald Scholten; Kenneth L Wilson; Leo Mercer; Michael L McCann Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2016-10-19