Literature DB >> 25075966

Understanding the role of saliva in aroma release from wine by using static and dynamic headspace conditions.

Carolina Muñoz-González1, Gilles Feron, Elisabeth Guichard, J José Rodríguez-Bencomo, Pedro J Martín-Álvarez, M Victoria Moreno-Arribas, M Ángeles Pozo-Bayón.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the role of saliva in wine aroma release by using static and dynamic headspace conditions. In the latter conditions, two different sampling points (t = 0 and t = 10 min) corresponding with oral (25.5 °C) and postoral phases (36 °C) were monitored. Both methodologies were applied to reconstituted dearomatized white and red wines with different nonvolatile wine matrix compositions and a synthetic wine (without matrix effect). All of the wines had the same ethanol concentration and were spiked with a mixture of 45 aroma compounds covering a wide range of physicochemical characteristics at typical wine concentrations. Two types of saliva (human and artificial) or control samples (water) were added to the wines. The adequacy of the two headspace methodologies for the purposes of the study (repeatability, linear ranges, determination coefficients, etc.) was previously determined. After application of different chemometric analysis (ANOVA, LSD, PCA), results showed a significant effect of saliva on aroma release dependent on saliva type (differences between artificial and human) and on wine matrix using static headspace conditions. Red wines were more affected than white and synthetic wines by saliva, specifically human saliva, which provoked a reduction in aroma release for most of the assayed aroma compounds independent of their chemical structure. The application of dynamic headspace conditions using a saliva bioreactor at the two different sampling points (t = 0 and t = 10 min) showed a lesser but significant effect of saliva than matrix composition and a high influence of temperature (oral and postoral phases) on aroma release.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aroma release; dynamic HS-SPME-GC/MS; saliva; static HS-SPME-GC/MS; wine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25075966     DOI: 10.1021/jf503503b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  5 in total

1.  Studying dynamic aroma release by headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-IMS): method optimization, validation, and application.

Authors:  Christine F Thomas; Ellen Zeh; Selina Dörfel; Yanyan Zhang; Jörg Hinrichs
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Biophenolic Compounds Influence the In-Mouth Perceived Intensity of Virgin Olive Oil Flavours and Off-Flavours.

Authors:  Alessandro Genovese; Ferdinando Mondola; Antonello Paduano; Raffaele Sacchi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Interactions Among Odorants, Phenolic Compounds, and Oral Components and Their Effects on Wine Aroma Volatility.

Authors:  María Perez-Jiménez; Adelaida Esteban-Fernández; Carolina Muñoz-González; María Angeles Pozo-Bayón
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Understanding the lost functionality of ethanol in non-alcoholic beer using sensory evaluation, aroma release and molecular hydrodynamics.

Authors:  Imogen Ramsey; Vlad Dinu; Rob Linforth; Gleb E Yakubov; Stephen E Harding; Qian Yang; Rebecca Ford; Ian Fisk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Understanding human salivary esterase activity and its variation under wine consumption conditions.

Authors:  Pérez-Jiménez María; Muñoz-González Carolina; Pozo-Bayón María Ángeles
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.361

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.