| Literature DB >> 25075864 |
Mohammad Mohammadrezaei1, Majid Toghyani2, Abbasali Gheisari3, Mehdi Toghyani4, Shahin Eghbalsaied5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Fadrozole hydrochloride and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) on female-to-male sex reversal, hatching traits, and body weight of broiler chickens. On the third day of incubation, fertile eggs were randomly assigned to five experimental groups comprising (i) Fadrozole (0.1 mg/egg), (ii) rhIGF-I (100 ng/egg), (iii) Fadrozole (0.1 mg/egg) + rhIGF-I (100 ng/egg), (iv) vehicle injection (10 mM acetic acid and 0.1% BSA), and (v) non-injected eggs. Eggs in the rhIGF-I-injected groups showed the mode of hatching time at the 480th hour of incubation, 12 hours earlier compared to the other groups, with no statistically significant difference in mortality and hatchability. On Day 1 and 42 of production, 90% of genetically female chicks were masculinized using Fadrozole treatment, while 100% female-to-male phenotypic sex reversal was observed in the Fadrozole+rhIGF-I group. Fadrozole equalized the body weight of both genders, although rhIGF-I was effective on the body weight of male chicks only. Interestingly, combined rhIGF-I and Fadrozole could increase the body weight in both sexes compared to the individual injections (P<0.05). These findings revealed that (i) IGF-I-treated chicken embryos were shown to be an effective option for overcoming the very long chicken deprivation period, (ii) the simultaneous treatment with Fadrozole and IGF-I could maximize the female-to-male sex reversal chance, (iii) the increase in the body weight of masculinized chickens via Fadrozole could be equal to their genetically male counterparts, and (iv) the IGF-I effectiveness, specifically along with the application of aromatase inhibitors in female chicks, indicates that estrogen synthesis could be a stumbling block for the IGF-I action mechanism in female embryos.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25075864 PMCID: PMC4116201 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Distribution frequencies of the chicken hatching time.
(A) Graphical presentation of hatching time in Control, Sham injection control, Fadrozole (0.1 mg), IGF-I (100 ng), Fadrozole (0.1 mg) + IGF-I (100 ng) groups. All injections were carried out on Day 3 of egg incubation over a long distance from the embryo location. (B) Skewness and (C) kurtosis criteria of the distribution frequencies.
Hatchability and mortality characters of in ovo exposed chicken embryos with Fadrozole and IGF-I.
| Treatment | Fadrozole (mg) | IGF-I (ng) | No. of eggs | No. of Hatching | Hatchability (%) | No. of Mortality (PCR) | |
| ♂ | ♀ | ||||||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 96 | 76 | 79.1 | 8 | 12 |
| Sham (PBS) | 0 | 0 | 96 | 73 | 76 | 11 | 12 |
| Fadrozole | 0.1 | 0 | 96 | 74 | 77.1 | 8 | 14 |
| IGF-I | 0 | 100 | 96 | 75 | 78.1 | 10 | 11 |
| Fadrozole+IGF-I | 0.1 | 100 | 96 | 72 | 75 | 9 | 15 |
No significant difference was observed at P-value<0.05 among different groups.
Sexing on the hatch day of Fadrozole/IGF-I treated chicken embryos.
| Treatment | Fadrozole (mg) | IGF-I (ng) | No. of Chicks | Vent Sexing | Genotype Sexing | Rate of sex Reversal (%) | ||
| ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | |||||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 44 | 24 | 20 | 24 | 20 | 0 |
| Sham (PBS) | 0 | 0 | 41 | 28 | 13 | 28 | 13 | 0 |
| Fadrozole | 0.1 | 0 | 42 | 40 | 2 | 23 | 19 | 90 |
| IGF-I | 0 | 100 | 43 | 16 | 27 | 16 | 27 | 0 |
| Fadrozole+IGF-I | 0.1 | 100 | 40 | 40 | 0 | 18 | 22 | 100 |
Rate of sex reversal: ratio of number of female-to-male sex-reversed females over number of genetic females at hatch.
Sexing on 42 days post-hatch of Fadrozole/IGF-I treated chicken embryos.
| Treatment | Fadrozole (mg) | IGF-I (ng) | No. of Chicks | Anatomical morphology | Genotype Sexing | Rate of sex Reversal (%) | ||
| ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | |||||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 32 | 14 | 18 | 14 | 18 | 0 |
| Sham (PBS) | 0 | 0 | 32 | 19 | 13 | 19 | 13 | 0 |
| Fadrozole | 0.1 | 0 | 32 | 31 | 1 | 22 | 10 | 90 |
| IGF-I | 0 | 100 | 32 | 21 | 11 | 21 | 11 | 0 |
| Fadrozole+IGF-I | 0.1 | 100 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 13 | 19 | 100 |
Rate of sex reversal: ratio of number of female-to-male sex-reversed females over number of genetic females on Day 42 of production.
Serum biochemical parameters of hatched chickens which were exposed to Fadrozole and IGF-I in ovo.
| Treatment | Fadrozole (mg) | IGF-I(ng) | No. ofChicks | Protein (g/100 ml) | Triglyceride (mg/dl) | Glucose (mg/dl) | |||
| ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ||||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3.53±0.04 | 3.57±0.06 | 70±8.1 | 66±7.6 | 207±2.7 | 211±3.2 |
| Sham (PBS) | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3.49±0.06 | 3.40±0.07 | 65±7.8 | 63±7.9 | 210±3.1 | 209±3.3 |
| Fadrozole | 0.1 | 0 | 16 | 3.45±0.04 | 3.49±0.06 | 69±6.2 | 68±6.8 | 206±3.3 | 203±3.1 |
| IGF-I | 0 | 100 | 16 | 4.36±0.05 | 4.26±0.07 | 97±4.9 | 96±5.9 | 222±3.7 | 219±3.1 |
| Fadrozole+IGF-I | 0.1 | 100 | 16 | 4.43±0.05 | 4.39±0.04 | 91±5.7 | 93±5.2 | 217±2.3 | 221±3.2 |
| P-Value | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.006 | 0.004 | |||
*Data were compared using Tukey’s test in the general linear model (GLM) procedure and are shown with mean ± SE.
Different letters at columns denote significant difference (P≤0.05) and same letters at columns denote no significant difference. For all traits, no significant difference was observed between two sexes in each group (P<0.05). P-Value row indicates the P-value of the calculated F statistics for the treatment effect following the analysis of variance.
Figure 2Body weight on Day 1 and 42 of production from in ovo exposed chicken embryos with Fadrozole and IGF-I.
The impact of chicken embryo treatment on Day 3 of incubation with Fadrozole (0.1 mg) and IGF-I (100 ng) on the average body weight (g) is depicted in (A) 1-day-old and (B) 42-day-old chicks. For the data analysis, chicks were divided into male and female sub-groups, based on ZZ/ZW genotype. Mean comparisons among five groups for each sex were carried out using Tukey post-hoc test in general linear model (GLM) procedure. In addition, mean comparison between male and female sub-groups of each treatment was conducted using an independent t-test, and the significant differences are denoted by an asterisk (*). abGroups with identical superscripts in each specific gender denote no significant difference (P≥0.05).