Nitric oxide (NO) participates in neuronal lesions in the digestive form of Chagas disease and the proximity of parasitised glial cells and neurons in damaged myenteric ganglia is a frequent finding. Glial cells have crucial roles in many neuropathological situations and are potential sources of NO. Here, we investigate peripheral glial cell response to Trypanosoma cruzi infection to clarify the role of these cells in the neuronal lesion pathogenesis of Chagas disease. We used primary glial cell cultures from superior cervical ganglion to investigate cell activation and NO production after T. cruzi infection or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure in comparison to peritoneal macrophages. T. cruzi infection was greater in glial cells, despite similar levels of NO production in both cell types. Glial cells responded similarly to T. cruzi and LPS, but were less responsive to LPS than macrophages were. Our observations contribute to the understanding of Chagas disease pathogenesis, as based on the high susceptibility of autonomic glial cells to T. cruzi infection with subsequent NO production. Moreover, our findings will facilitate future research into the immune responses and activation mechanisms of peripheral glial cells, which are important for understanding the paradoxical responses of this cell type in neuronal lesions and neuroprotection.
Nitric oxide (NO) participates in neuronal lesions in the digestive form of Chagas disease and the proximity of parasitised glial cells and neurons in damaged myenteric ganglia is a frequent finding. Glial cells have crucial roles in many neuropathological situations and are potential sources of NO. Here, we investigate peripheral glial cell response to Trypanosoma cruzi infection to clarify the role of these cells in the neuronal lesion pathogenesis of Chagas disease. We used primary glial cell cultures from superior cervical ganglion to investigate cell activation and NO production after T. cruzi infection or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure in comparison to peritoneal macrophages. T. cruzi infection was greater in glial cells, despite similar levels of NO production in both cell types. Glial cells responded similarly to T. cruzi and LPS, but were less responsive to LPS than macrophages were. Our observations contribute to the understanding of Chagas disease pathogenesis, as based on the high susceptibility of autonomic glial cells to T. cruzi infection with subsequent NO production. Moreover, our findings will facilitate future research into the immune responses and activation mechanisms of peripheral glial cells, which are important for understanding the paradoxical responses of this cell type in neuronal lesions and neuroprotection.
The role of sympathetic glial cells in a variety of parasitic diseases remains unknown,
despite the clear relevance of their infection and response to parasites to neuronal
lesions in autonomic and enteric ganglia. Many studies have elucidated crucial roles for
glial cells in neuropathological situations through the release of trophic factors,
neuroprotective molecules or neurotoxic chemicals that mediate neuronal survival, function,
lesion or death (Garden & Moller 2006, Giaume et al. 2007). Glial cells are in close contact
with neurons in both the central and peripheral nervous systems and are believed to affect
them to a greater degree than inflammatory cells and their products (Arantes et al. 2000, Almeida-Leite et al.
2007, Dewil et al. 2007, von Bernhardi 2007). In intestinal Chagas disease,
parasitised glial cells and neuronal cells in close proximity to damaged myenteric ganglia
is a frequent finding (Tafuri 1970, Arantes et al. 2004). Thus, it is extremely important to
elucidate how glial cells are activated by and respond to pathogens, which will help to
clarify the mechanisms of pathogenesis for numerous nervous system diseases.Central glial cells such as astrocytes and microglia have been investigated in vitro and
the intracellular pathways activated in response to various stimuli are well established
(Jana et al. 2005, Saha & Pahan 2006). However, despite their important roles,
peripheral glial cells have not been equally well investigated (Griffin & Thompson 2008, Hanani
2010).In this study, we used a superior cervical ganglion (SCG) glial cell culture that was
standardised by our group (Almeida-Leite & Arantes
2010) to study and compare how peripheral glial cells and peritoneal macrophages
respond to two types of stimuli.The first stimulus was the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, which causes
Chagas disease, a significant cause of morbidity and mortality that affects 7.7 million
people in Latin America and caused more than 10,000 deaths in 2008 (Strasen et al. 2014). Resistance to T. cruzi infection
is associated with the capacity of lymphocytes to generate interferon-γ (IFN-γ), which
activates macrophages to produce nitric oxide (NO), the main effector molecule that
controls intracellular T. cruzi multiplication (Gazzinelli et al. 1992, Vespa et al.
1994). NO is also related to tissue damage (Vespa
et al. 1994, Chandra et al. 2002),
myenteric denervation (Arantes et al. 2004), neuronal
death and reduced neurite density in T. cruzi infection (Almeida-Leite et al. 2007).It has been found that autonomic glial cells are susceptible to infection in human
intestines (Tafuri 1970) and their parasitism and
responses have been implicated in neuronal death (Tafuri
1970, Tanowitz et al. 1982). However, it
is unclear whether these peripheral glial cells produce inducible NO synthase
(iNOS)-derived NO and whether they exert an important role in tissue lesions and neuronal
death, as observed in T. cruzi infection. It has been suggested that
glial-derived NO contributes to the neurodegenerative process observed in the spinal cords
of T. cruzi-infected interleukin (IL)-12p40 knock-out mice (Bombeiro et al. 2009). In addition to the central
nervous system (CNS), the enteric nervous system is also compromised in Chagas disease;
however, the autonomic glial cell production of NO has not yet been studied.The second stimulus used in this study was bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the major
component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, which induces potent NO
production and immune responses (Stuehr & Marletta
1985, Ohmori & Hamilton 2001).
Macrophages and resident glial cells in the CNS (astroglia and microglia) express iNOS and
produce high levels of NO in response to a wide variety of pro-inflammatory and
degenerative stimuli (Saha & Pahan 2006).
Although the responses of these cells to these stimuli have been well characterised in
vitro, the intracellular mechanisms involved are not completely understood.Because glial cells have a crucial role in neuronal lesions and survival (Hansson & Ronnback 2003) and are able to produce NO
in response to a variety of stimuli, we aimed to investigate how the response of peripheral
glial cells to either T. cruzi infection or LPS differed from the response
of peritoneal macrophages. Our goal was to establish the importance of peripheral glial
cells as a source of NO in Chagas disease while contributing to the study of glial cell
biology. Our observations contribute to the understanding of the intestinal form of Chagas
disease pathogenesis based on the high susceptibility of autonomic glial cells to
T. cruzi infection with subsequent NO production, ultimately leading to
neuronal lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
SCG glial cell culture - Pure primary cultures of SCG glial cells were
prepared as previously described (Almeida-Leite &
Arantes 2010). Briefly, SCGs were removed from one-four-day-old C57BL/6
wild-type (WT) mice after decapitation and enzymatically dissociated in 1×
trypsin/ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid solution (Sigma Chemical Company, USA).
Isolated sympathetic cells at a final concentration of 105 cells/well were
plated in cell culture plates (96 or 24-well; Sarstedt, Germany) coated with a 1:5
dilution of Matrigel (Becton Dickinson, USA) in sterile distilled water and cultured in
10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 UI/mL penicillin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 10,000
µg/mL streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)
(Sigma-Aldrich). The cultures were maintained at 37ºC in a humidified 5% CO2
incubator for five-eight days before interventions; the culture medium was changed every
48 h.Peritoneal macrophage culture - Macrophages were harvested from the
peritoneal cavity of adult WT mice at three days after the injection of 2 mL of 3%
(wt/vol) sodium thioglycolate (Sigma Chemical Company), as previously described (Stuehr & Marletta 1985, Talvani et al. 2002). After centrifugation at 400 g
for 10 min, the pellet was resuspended in the medium and a single hypotonic lysis was
performed as described to remove erythrocytes (du Manoir
et al. 2002). Another centrifugation was carried out and the cells were
resuspended and plated in cell culture plates (96 or 24-well; Sarstedt), coated with a
1:5 dilution of Matrigel (Becton Dickinson) in sterile distilled water and cultured in
10% FBS, 100 UI/mL penicillin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 10,000 µg/mL streptomycin
(Sigma-Aldrich) in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich). After 2 h, the cultures were washed to remove
the non-adherent cells, leaving a 97% pure population of adherent macrophages. The
cultures were maintained at 37ºC in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h
before interventions.Parasite - The T. cruzi Y strain was used for all
experiments. Trypomastigote forms were cultured and purified from the monkey kidney
epithelial cell line VERO, as previously described (Braga
et al. 1993). Parasites were harvested after six days in culture, centrifuged
at 150 g for 10 min at room temperature (RT), counted in a Neubauer
chamber, centrifuged at 450 g for 10 min at 4ºC, suspended in 10% FBS
supplemented 199 medium and used to infect cultures.T. cruzi infection - T. cruzi trypomastigotes were added to cultures at
a parasite-to-cell ratio of 5-10:1. The cells were maintained at 37ºC in a humidified 5%
CO2 incubator for 48 h in the presence of 200 UI/mL of recombinant murine
IFN-γ.LPS addition - Escherichia coliLPS (L-4130; Sigma-Aldrich) was added
to the cultures at a final concentration of 50 ng/mL. The cells were maintained at 37ºC
in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator for 48 h in the presence of 200 UI/mL of
recombinant murine IFN-γ.Blockade of iNOS activity - To define the role of NO in T.
cruzi infection in glial cells in comparison to macrophages, the iNOS
inhibitor aminoguanidine (AG) (300 μM, A7009; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to cultures to
block iNOS activity.Assessment of infection - Cultures were fixed in 10% neutral buffered
formalin solution at 48 h post-intervention (p.i.) and stained with 10% Giemsa (Doles
Reagents, Brazil). The infection rate was determined by counting the intracellular
amastigote forms, as previously described (Vespa et al.
1994, Silva et al. 1995).Immunofluorescence - Cultured fixed cells were washed in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), permeabilised with 0.25% Triton X-100 (Roche,
Switzerland) in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Inlab, Brazil) for 10 min
at RT and incubated with 1:40 normal goat serum in PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100 and
2% BSA for 30 min at RT to block non-specific binding sites. The primary antibodies used
to characterise macrophages and glial cells were primary rat anti-mouse F4/80 (1:50;
Serotec, UK) and Alexa Fluor 488goat anti-rat IgG antibodies and primary rabbit
anti-glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) (1:100; Dako, Denmark) and Alexa Fluor 488goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (1:400; Molecular Probes, USA), respectively. iNOS
expression was detected with primary rabbit anti-iNOS (1:100; Chemicon, USA) and Alexa
Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:400; Molecular Probes) antibodies. Secondary
antibodies alone were used as specificity controls and uniformly resulted in very low
background levels of reactivity. Nuclear staining was assessed using the fluorescent
probe Hoechst (0.2 µg/mL; Molecular Probes). The cells were examined by microscopy and
digital images were acquired for documentation. The fluorescence intensity was measured
by the mean grey value of the binary images from two independent experiments performed
in triplicate using ImageJ 1.45s [National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA].Evaluation of NO
-
production - Culture supernatants collected at 48 h p.i. and stored at
-20ºC were assayed for their nitrite concentration by mixing 0.1 mL of culture
supernatant with 0.1 mL of 0.1% naphthylethylene diamine dihydrochloride and 1%
sulfanilamide plus 2.5% phosphoric acid, as previously described (Green et al. 1981). The absorbance at 540 nm was measured after 10
min and the NO2
- concentration was determined by reference to a standard curve of 1-200 µM
NaNO2.Statistical analysis - The results were expressed as the mean ±
standard error of the mean (parametric data) or as the median (non-parametric data) of
at least three independent experiments. Data were analysed for statistical significance
using a non-paired t test (parametric data) or a Mann-Whitney
U test (non-parametric data). Probability values (p) of 0.05 or less
were considered significant. All analyses were carried out using GraphPad InStat
software (USA).Ethics - All animals used in the research were acquired and cared for
in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals guidelines
and the principles presented in the Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience
Research. All animal protocols were approved by the university Ethical Committee in
Animal Experimentation.
RESULTS
The glial cells in all cultures showed a flat and irregular shape, from spindle-like to
polygonal and few cytoplasmic processes. Most glial cells were immunopositive for the
glial cell marker GFAP (Fig. 1A). The macrophages
in culture showed irregular shapes, from round to fusiform, and were immunopositive for
the macrophage marker F4/80 (Fig. 1B).
Comparatively, the glial cell cytoplasm was larger than the macrophage cytoplasm (Fig. 1A, B).
Fig. 1
: Trypanosoma cruzi-infected glial cell or macrophage
cultures. A, B: glial fibrillary acid protein immunopositive glial cells (A)
and F4/80-immunopositive macrophages (B) in culture. Nuclear staining was
assessed using the fluorescent probe Hoechst; C, D: T.
cruzi-infected glial cells (C) or macrophages (D), showing
intracellular amastigotes (arrows) 48 h post-intervention (p.i.). Giemsa
staining; E, F: inducible nitric oxide synthase immunopositivity in T.
cruzi-infected glial cells (E) or macrophages (F and insert) 48 h
p.i. Nuclear staining was assessed using the fluorescent probe Hoechst.
After 48 h of T. cruzi infection, most glial cells showed intense
parasitism and swollen cytoplasm, with numerous intracellular amastigotes (Fig. 1C). Some macrophages were parasitised and a few
intracellular amastigotes could be observed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1D).To determine the infection rate, parasitised cells in both cultures were counted. A
quantitative analysis showed a higher number of infected cells in the glial cell
cultures than in the macrophage cultures (Fig.
2A). However, when iNOS activity was blocked by AG, there was a significant
decrease in the number of infected glial cells, with a significant increase in infected
macrophages (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 2
: Trypanosoma cruzi infection and inducible nitric oxide
synthase (iNOS) expression in glial cells and macrophages. A: percentage of
T. cruzi-infected cells in glial cell or macrophage
cultures. The data correspond to the mean of five independent experiments ±
standard error of the mean (SEM). Asterisks mean statistically significant
difference (p < 0.01, unpaired t test); B: number of
amastigotes/cell in T. cruzi-infected glial cell or macrophage
cultures. The data correspond to the mean of five independent experiments ± SEM
(p < 0.05, unpaired t test); C: intensity of iNOS
immunofluorescence in T. cruzi-infected glial cell or
macrophage cultures 48 h post-intervention. The data correspond to the mean of
two independent experiments in triplicate ± SEM (p < 0.05, unpaired
t test); A: aminoguainidine; G: glial cell; I:
interferon-γ; M: macrophage; T: T. cruzi.
To calculate the degree of cell parasitism per infected cell in both cultures, the
number of intracellular amastigotes was counted per infected cell of 100 cells (Fig. 2B). No statistically significant difference was
observed when both cell types were compared in the presence of NO. However, cell
parasitism decreased in both cell types when iNOS was blocked by AG (Fig. 2B).The glial cells expressed iNOS and were highly infected with intracellular amastigotes
(Fig. 1E). As expected, the T.
cruzi-infected macrophages also showed iNOS immunopositivity (Fig. 1F). When both cultures were compared, iNOS
cytoplasmic fluorescence was systematically more intense in the macrophages than in the
glial cells (Fig. 1E, F). A quantitative analysis of the fluorescence intensity showed
that the macrophages expressed higher iNOS immunopositivity than the glial cells (Fig. 2C).In comparison to the controls, the T. cruzi-infected and
IFN-γ-activated glial cells showed significantly higher levels of NO production at 48 h
p.i. (Fig. 3A). Similarly, treatment with IFN-γ
and T. cruzi infection resulted in significant levels of NO production
in comparison to all controls in macrophage cultures. Nonetheless, the macrophages were
more responsive to LPS than to T. cruzi in the presence of IFN-γ (Fig. 3A, B).
There was no significant difference with regard to NO production between the T.
cruzi-infected and IFN-γ-activated glial cell or macrophage cultures.
Fig. 3
: nitric oxide (NO) production in glial cells and macrophages.
Trypanosoma cruzi-infected (A) or
lipopolysaccharide-activated glial cell or macrophage cultures (B). The data
correspond to the median of four (A) or three (B) independent experiments in
triplicate. Asterisks mean statistically significant differences to controls
(medium) (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). MLI statistically
different from MTI (p < 0.01, unpaired t test). G: glial
cell; I: interferon-γ; L: lipopolysaccharide;
M: macrophage; T: T. cruzi.
: nitric oxide (NO) production in glial cells and macrophages.
Trypanosoma cruzi-infected (A) or
lipopolysaccharide-activated glial cell or macrophage cultures (B). The data
correspond to the median of four (A) or three (B) independent experiments in
triplicate. Asterisks mean statistically significant differences to controls
(medium) (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). MLI statistically
different from MTI (p < 0.01, unpaired t test). G: glial
cell; I: interferon-γ; L: lipopolysaccharide;
M: macrophage; T: T. cruzi.LPS addition resulted in significantly higher levels of NO production in both the glial
cell and macrophage cultures in comparison to the control, LPS or IFN-γ alone at 48 h
p.i. (Fig. 3B). However, the macrophages produced
greater amounts of NO when compared to the glial cell cultures when both LPS and IFN-γ
were present. When the T. cruzi-infected and IFN-γ-activated glial cell
cultures were compared to the LPS and IFN-γ-activated glial cell cultures, there was no
difference regarding NO production, regardless of the stimulus (Fig. 3) and the levels of NO production were very similar.
DISCUSSION
We used a model of primary glial cell culture from the SCG to investigate glial cell
activation and iNOS-derived NO production after T. cruzi infection or
LPS addition and compared this to peritoneal macrophage cultures under the same
conditions. Here, we show that T. cruzi infection was greater in glial
cells than in macrophages, despite similar levels of NO production. Glial cells
responded similarly to both stimuli, whereas macrophages responded better to LPS than to
T. cruzi infection.Despite the close association of glial cells to neurons in the peripheral ganglia and
CNS and their participation in pro and anti-inflammatory responses (Hansson & Ronnback 2003, Saha & Pahan 2006), the cellular activation pathways are not
well defined for this cell type (Saha & Pahan
2006, Hanani 2010). Our group has
studied SCG neurons (Almeida-Leite et al. 2007)
and glial cells (Almeida-Leite & Arantes 2010)
due to their participation in the neuronal degenerative changes induced by T.
cruzi. This parasite has a tropism to nervous tissues in intracardiac
ganglia (Machado & Ribeiro 1989) and the
intramural myenteric plexus, a site where glia parasitism has been reported, whereas
neuronal infection is rarely observed (Tafuri
1970, Arantes et al. 2004). Autonomic
ganglia, such as intracardiac and celiac ganglia and the enteric nervous system are
preferentially affected in human and experimental Chagas disease and most likely play an
important role in the disease’s physiopathology (Tafuri
1970, Machado & Ribeiro 1989, Arantes et al. 2004). The SCG is a prototype of
autonomic ganglia and SCG primary neuronal cultures are widely considered a classical
instrument of investigation (Blennerhassett et al.
1991). However, SCG glial cells have been less explored than neurons and have
never been used for the in vitro study of T. cruzi infection.Our results indicated that in vitro glial cells are susceptible to T.
cruzi infection, as previously described in vivo (Tafuri 1970, Arantes et al.
2004). Astrocytes are very susceptible to T. cruzi
multiplication in vitro (Troyo & Chinchilla
2003) and here we show that sympathetic glial cells are susceptible as well,
which has implications for neuronal lesions in autonomic and enteric ganglia. Moreover,
T. cruzi infection in glial cells was 1.6 times greater than in
macrophages at a similar parasite to cell ratio. Despite being infected more easily,
glial cells showed no morphological signs of cell degeneration or death. T.
cruzi promotes glial cell survival through the neurotrophin-3 receptor TrkC
(Weinkauf & Pereiraperrin 2009, Weinkauf et al. 2011) and it has been shown that
macrophages are infected less frequently than are other cell types (Tanowitz et al. 1975), as also observed in our
study. It is reasonable to suggest that glial cells have a more permissive behaviour
toward T. cruzi infection because they have a larger cytoplasm and are
non-professional phagocytes (Pilar & Landmesser
1976). Furthermore, it has been described that glial cells may favour parasite
survival and multiplication (Troyo & Chinchilla
2003). Macrophages, in contrast, are innate immune cells and naturally
resistant to intracellular infections (Tanowitz et al.
1975) and may express distinct genes that limit intracellular parasite
multiplication (Crocker et al. 1987). T.
cruzi invades several cell types by exploiting phagocytic or non-phagocytic
mechanisms, depending on the cell involved (Caradonna
& Burleigh 2011). Thus, the entry mechanism of T. cruzi
into peripheral glial cells deserves further investigation, as has been performed for
other cells (Burleigh & Andrews 1998, Andrade & Andrews 2004, Weinkauf et al. 2011).One might predict that the greater infection rate in glial cells would be associated
with impaired resistance and deficient NO production. Instead, the supernatant NO levels
of T. cruzi-infected glial cells were similar to macrophage levels
under the same conditions. However, considering that glial cells showed a higher rate of
infection and produced similar levels of NO, their response appears to be less intense
than that observed for macrophages. When assessing iNOS intensity by immunofluorescence,
a lower quantity of expressed protein is observed. The differential regulation
mechanisms of the iNOS gene in macrophages and glial cells (Gazzinelli et al. 1992, Vespa et al.
1994, Pahan et al. 1998, Saha & Pahan 2006) could explain the greater
infection rate and similar NO production in glial cell cultures, in agreement with the
paradoxical protective role of glial cells.It has been shown that the parasite Toxoplasma gondii exerts an
inhibitory effect on iNOS expression in microglia (Rozenfeld et al. 2005), which may also be the case for T.
cruzi and SCG glial cells. Moreover, the host defence activity of human
microglia against T. gondii does not depend on NO, but primarily on
IFN-γ, tumour necrosis factor-α and IL-6 (Chao et al.
1992). The synthesis and secretion of such mediators, as well as leukotriene
B4 (Silva et al. 1995, Talvani et al. 2002), could justify distinct infection rates in
glial cells and macrophages. It is also known that T. cruzi
trans-sialidase protects Schwann cells from cell death by activating the
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway (Chuenkova
& Pereira 2001). Hence, it is possible that our glial cells are more
resistant to T. cruzi infection, showing a greater infection rate
without morphological evidence of cell death and with less trypanocide activity through
NO in comparison to macrophages. However, due to the proximity of glial cells to
ganglionic neurons, their products of activation may have damaging effects that may be
particularly harmful in both the cardiac and intestinal forms of Chagas disease, as NO
has been associated with neuronal death in T. cruzi infection (Almeida-Leite et al. 2007).Distinct roles for NO in glial cells or macrophages in the control of T.
cruzi infection might be suggested by the decreased number of infected glial
cells when iNOS activity was blocked by AG. Although it has been shown that the absence
of NO leads to higher parasitism (Arantes et al.
2004), some in vitro studies have demonstrated that the addition of AG
decreased cell parasitism, as observed in our study. Other mechanisms known to control
parasite replication may also be triggered and the partial inhibition of parasitism was
due to cytokine production (Aliberti et al. 1999,
Machado et al. 2000). Moreover, both in vivo
and in vitro studies have shown that NO is not required for the control of T.
cruzi infection and the enhanced expression of other inflammatory mediators
may in part compensate for the lack of iNOS (Cummings
& Tarleton 2004, Marinho et al.
2007). We believe that our glial cells may compensate for iNOS blockade by
releasing cytokines and chemokines that control T. cruzi infection to a
greater degree than macrophages. We could also assume that NO might be less effective in
glial cells as a mechanism of parasite control. In contrast, the blockade of NO
production reduced cell parasitism in both cell types and this may be due to distinct
mechanisms of parasite uptake and replication, as previously shown (Aliberti et al. 1999).The addition of LPS induced greater levels of nitrites in macrophage cultures compared
to glial cell cultures. Indeed, it is known that T. cruzi and LPS have
diverse effects in macrophages by activating different Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (Ropert et al. 2001), whereas glial cell activation
pathways have not been well established (Saha &
Pahan 2006). It has been shown that iNOS activation is different in astrocytes
and macrophages (Pahan et al. 1998), which led us
to believe that peripheral glial cells may also exhibit different levels of iNOS
activation. Although macrophages showed greater NO production in LPS-primed cultures in
comparison to T. cruzi-infected cultures, glial cells showed similar
nitrite levels under either stimulus. Our results indicate that autonomic glial cells
respond similarly to LPS and T. cruzi, which are known to activate TLR4
and TLR2, respectively, in macrophages (Hoshino et al.
1999, Ropert et al. 2001). Although the
transduction signals generated by distinct TLRs are very similar, cellular responses may
be quite different (Campos et al. 2001). Central
glial cells respond to LPS via the activation of TLR4 (Lehnardt et al. 2003), as in macrophages (Hoshino et al. 1999); in the presence of LPS,
Schwann cells express TLR4 (Cheng et al. 2007)
and enteric glial cells produce NO (Cirillo et al.
2011). However, detailed information regarding TRL4 activation following iNOS
induction in the presence of LPS in peripheral glial cells has not been described. Thus,
it is reasonable to suggest that iNOS activation by T. cruzi and LPS in
SCG glial cells involves different TLRs. Although is not known whether SCG glial cells
express TLR4 or TLR2, this appears likely because they are the best characterised TLRs
with regard to the recognition of microbial motifs and LPS, respectively (Hanke & Kielian 2011). Further studies of TLR
expression in SCG glial cells are intended.Our observations contribute to the understanding of Chagas disease pathogenesis, as
based on the high susceptibility of autonomic glial cells to T. cruziinfection with subsequent NO production. Moreover, our findings will facilitate future
research into the immune responses and activation mechanisms of peripheral glial cells,
which are important for understanding the paradoxical responses of this cell type in
neuronal lesions and neuroprotection.
Authors: M A Campos; I C Almeida; O Takeuchi; S Akira; E P Valente; D O Procópio; L R Travassos; J A Smith; D T Golenbock; R T Gazzinelli Journal: J Immunol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Jeanne M du Manoir; Betty N Albright; Greg Stevenson; Sarah H Thompson; Gordon B Mitchell; Mary Ellen Clark; Jeff L Caswell Journal: Vet Immunol Immunopathol Date: 2002-10-28 Impact factor: 2.046
Authors: Seija Lehnardt; Leon Massillon; Pamela Follett; Frances E Jensen; Rajiv Ratan; Paul A Rosenberg; Joseph J Volpe; Timothy Vartanian Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rosa M E Arantes; Homero H F Marche; Maria T Bahia; Fernando Q Cunha; Marcos A Rossi; João S Silva Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Sergio M Borghi; Victor Fattori; Thacyana T Carvalho; Vera L H Tatakihara; Tiago H Zaninelli; Felipe A Pinho-Ribeiro; Camila R Ferraz; Larissa Staurengo-Ferrari; Rubia Casagrande; Wander R Pavanelli; Fernando Q Cunha; Thiago M Cunha; Phileno Pinge-Filho; Waldiceu A Verri Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 7.561