Literature DB >> 25075525

Cell commitment motif composed of progenitor-specific transcription factors and mutual-inhibition regulation.

Tongpeng Wang1, Shanshan Li2, Yanwei Liu2, Ruiqi Wang2.   

Abstract

Simple mutual-inhibition networks are frequently occurring motifs in transcriptional regulatory networks for cell lineage commitment. Stable attractors represent cell commitment states. However, how progenitor-specific transcription factors stabilise progenitor cells and commit them to different cell fates remains unexplained. In this study, the authors represent the cell commitment motifs composed of mutual-inhibition regulation and progenitor-specific transcription factors, and develop associated mathematical model to understand how specific cell fate decisions are made. Bifurcation analysis and numerical simulation show that the model could exhibit multiple stable steady states corresponding to progenitor and committed cell states. The transitions between different cell states correspond to different commitment processes. Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that different commitment patterns, for example, haematopoietic and neural fate decisions fall within the scope of proposed framework.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25075525      PMCID: PMC8687188          DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2013.0051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IET Syst Biol        ISSN: 1751-8849            Impact factor:   1.615


  15 in total

Review 1.  Vertebrate neural cell-fate determination: lessons from the retina.

Authors:  F J Livesey; C L Cepko
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  The development of neural stem cells.

Authors:  S Temple
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The lineage decisions of helper T cells.

Authors:  Kenneth M Murphy; Steven L Reiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  A positive-feedback-based bistable 'memory module' that governs a cell fate decision.

Authors:  Wen Xiong; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Reusing and composing models of cell fate regulation of human bone precursor cells.

Authors:  Rodrigo Assar; Andrea V Leisewitz; Alice Garcia; Nibaldo C Inestrosa; Martín A Montecino; David J Sherman
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Cell differentiation modeled via a coupled two-switch regulatory network.

Authors:  D Schittler; J Hasenauer; F Allgöwer; S Waldherr
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.642

7.  Multilineage transcriptional priming and determination of alternate hematopoietic cell fates.

Authors:  Peter Laslo; Chauncey J Spooner; Aryeh Warmflash; David W Lancki; Hyun-Jun Lee; Roger Sciammas; Benjamin N Gantner; Aaron R Dinner; Harinder Singh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Regulatory mechanisms in stem cell biology.

Authors:  S J Morrison; N M Shah; D J Anderson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Predicting pancreas cell fate decisions and reprogramming with a hierarchical multi-attractor model.

Authors:  Joseph Xu Zhou; Lutz Brusch; Sui Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Integrating extrinsic and intrinsic cues into a minimal model of lineage commitment for hematopoietic progenitors.

Authors:  Santhosh Palani; Casim A Sarkar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.