Literature DB >> 25075462

Comparison of the clinical disc margin seen in stereo disc photographs with neural canal opening seen in optical coherence tomography images.

Mei Young1, Sieun Lee, Mahmoud Rateb, Mirza F Beg, Marinko V Sarunic, Paul J Mackenzie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare neural canal opening (NCO) with the clinical optic disc margin (DM) seen and to investigate the planarity of the NCO in normal human optic nerve heads (ONH).
METHODS: Sixteen eyes were imaged. Twelve healthy eyes were selected for planarity and 9 for NCO and DM correspondence. All subjects were subjected to a visual field examination, stereo disc photograph (SDP), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, clinical examination with a fellowship trained glaucoma specialist, and optical coherence tomography imaging. Three reviewers delineated the NCO and inner limiting membrane on optical coherence tomography images. The clinical DM was delineated by a glaucoma specialist while viewing SDPs. Plane error was calculated for NCO and for Bruch membrane (BM) at distances 80 and 120 μm from NCO.
RESULTS: The NCO segmentation interrater variability was low with an average coefficient of variation of 2.7%. A regional variation of the SDP and NCO correspondence was observed, wherein the temporal region had the largest coefficient of variation. The plane error of the NCO and BM were similar and was approximately 12 μm, which is small relative to an average DM diameter of 1.7 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The BM opening has a good correspondence with the clinical DM seen in SDPs. NCO delineation seemed to be reliable. The BM and NCO are relatively planar in normal humans and can be further evaluated for longitudinal studies to observe stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25075462     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829484a4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  1 in total

1.  The impact of optic nerve and related characteristics on disc area measurements derived from different imaging techniques.

Authors:  Michael Yapp; George Rennie; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis; Barbara Zangerl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.