| Literature DB >> 25075259 |
M Jason Highsmith1, Jason T Kahle2, Neil T Shepard3, Kenton R Kaufman4.
Abstract
A mechanistic explanation for previously observed safety improvements with microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees is needed. A repeated measures design of 15 subjects with unilateral transfemoral amputation was used to assess changes between baseline use of their standard of care, mechanical pros-theses, and a C-Leg microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee. The primary outcome measures were sensory dependency scores for somatosensory, visual, vestibular, and visual preference, which were calculated based on a Sensory Organization Test. Falls during posturographic assessment were also recorded. Somatosensory system dependency significantly increased (p = 0.047) while using the C-Leg compared to a nonmicroprocessor prosthetic knee (NMPK). Reliance on visual with vestibular input and reliance on vestibular input alone were not significantly increased with C-Leg use (p = 0.41 and p = 0.15, respectively). When utilizing the C-Leg, there was a significant reduction in the average number of falls (p = 0.03). Hence, increased reliance on somatosensory input is a possible explanation for improved balance with use of a microprocessor prosthetic knee (MPK).Entities:
Keywords: Amputee; Balance; NeuroCom; Rehabilitation; Safety; Transfemoral
Year: 2014 PMID: 25075259 PMCID: PMC4112114 DOI: 10.3727/194982413X13844488879212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Innov