| Literature DB >> 25074853 |
R Dobie1, V E MacRae2, C Huesa2, R van't Hof2, S F Ahmed2, C Farquharson2.
Abstract
The suppressor of cytokine signalling (Socs2(-/-))-knockout mouse is characterised by an overgrowth phenotype due to enhanced GH signalling. The objective of this study was to define the Socs2(-/-) bone phenotype and determine whether GH promotes bone mass via IGF1-dependent mechanisms. Despite no elevation in systemic IGF1 levels, increased body weight in 4-week-old Socs2(-/-) mice following GH treatment was associated with increased cortical bone area (Ct.Ar) (P<0.01). Furthermore, detailed bone analysis of male and female juvenile and adult Socs2(-/-) mice revealed an altered cortical and trabecular phenotype consistent with the known anabolic effects of GH. Indeed, male Socs2(-/-) mice had increased Ct.Ar (P<0.05) and thickness associated with increased strength. Despite this, there was no elevation in hepatic Igf1 expression, suggesting that the anabolic bone phenotype was the result of increased local GH action. Mechanistic studies showed that in osteoblasts and bone of Socs2(-/-) mice, STAT5 phosphorylation was significantly increased in response to GH. Conversely, overexpression of SOCS2 decreased GH-induced STAT5 signalling. Although an increase in Igf1 expression was observed in Socs2(-/-) osteoblasts following GH, it was not evident in vivo. Igf1 expression levels were not elevated in response to GH in 4-week-old mice and no alterations in expression was observed in bone samples of 6-week-old Socs2(-/-) mice. These studies emphasise the critical role of SOCS2 in controlling the local GH anabolic bone effects. We provide compelling evidence implicating SOCS2 in the regulation of GH osteoblast signalling and ultimately bone accrual, which maybe via mechanisms that are independent of IGF1 production in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: GH/IGF1; SOCS2; bone; osteoblast
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25074853 PMCID: PMC4166176 DOI: 10.1530/JOE-14-0292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endocrinol ISSN: 0022-0795 Impact factor: 4.286
Effects of SOCS2 on bone development in juvenile and adult male mice. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. n=3–5 for growth data and n=6 for trabecular, cortical and biomechanical data
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT |
| WT |
| |
| Growth | ||||
| Weight (g) | 21.3±0.29 | 26.1±0.62‡ | 32.9±1.68 | 41.5±1.04‡ |
| Weight gain (g/day) | 0.29±0.034 | 0.59±0.030‡ | 0.02±0.030 | 0.02±0.024 |
| Cortical endosteal MAR (μm/day) | 3.3±0.15 | 3.9±0.07 | NA | NA |
| Cortical periosteal MAR (μm/day) | 3.6±0.30 | 5.1±0.25† | NA | NA |
| Trabecular | ||||
| BV/TV (%) | 15.4±0.69 | 20.6±1.72† | 14.9±1.9 | 19.6±1.07* |
| Tb.N (1/mm) | 3.4±0.01 | 4.0±0.25 | 3.0±0.41 | 3.5±0.19 |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.04±0.001 | 0.05±0.002† | 0.05±0.002 | 0.06±0.001† |
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 0.17±0.01 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.2±0.01 | 0.18±0.01 |
| SMI | 1.9±0.05 | 1.7±0.08 | 1.7±0.18 | 1.5±0.05 |
| BMD (g/cm3) | 1.44±0.01 | 1.46±0.03 | 1.55±0.006 | 1.45±0.06 |
| Cortical | ||||
| Tt.Ar (mm2) | 0.8±0.03 | 1.0±0.03† | 0.9±0.06 | 1.3±0.04‡ |
| Ct.Ar (mm2) | 0.6±0.01 | 0.7±0.03‡ | 0.7±0.03 | 0.9±0.02‡ |
| Ma.Ar (mm2) | 0.23±0.016 | 0.25±0.015 | 0.25±0.029 | 0.41±0.018‡ |
| Ct.Th (mm) | 0.25±0.008 | 0.28±0.011† | 0.27±0.003 | 0.28±0.003 |
| J (mm4) | 0.10±0.003 | 0.15±0.012* | 0.13±0.016 | 0.24±0.014‡ |
| BMD (g/cm3) | 1.31±0.016 | 1.29±0.04 | 1.42±0.002 | 1.35±0.008* |
| Biomechanical | ||||
| Failure load (N) | 8.0±0.39 | 9.4±0.57 | 11.1±2.46 | 14.6±1.59* |
| Work to failure (mJ) | 2.6±0.23 | 3.6±0.34* | 3.3±0.71 | 6.2±2.35* |
| Load to maximum stiffness (N) | 4.4±0.33 | 4.7±0.41 | 6.2±1.62 | 6.8±1.21 |
| Maximum stiffness (N/mm) | 18.6±1.52 | 19.6±3.18 | 28.4±8.57 | 30.3±10.57 |
For trabecular data BV/TV, bone volume/tissue volume; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; SMI, structural model index. For cortical data Tt.Ar, total tissue area; Ct.Ar, cortical bone area; Ma.Ar, medullary area; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; J, polar moment of inertia. Significance from age-matched WT mice is denoted by *P<0.05, † P<0.01, ‡ P<0.001.
Figure 1Socs2 cortical bone phenotype. (A) Images of periosteal and endosteal cortical bone apposition rate in tibia from juvenile 6-week-old male WT and Socs2 mice. Scale bar=25 μm. (B) Load vs extension curves to point of failure of tibia from juvenile 6-week-old and adult 17-week-old, male and female WT (black) and Socs2 (grey hatched) mice.
Effects of SOCS2 on bone development in juvenile and adult female mice. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. (n=6)
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT |
| WT |
| |
| Growth | ||||
| Weight (g) | 16.3±0.62 | 19.3±0.4† | 26.2±0.91 | 31.3±0.99† |
| Weight gain (g/day) | 0.14±0.04 | 0.21±0.04 | 0.06±0.037 | 0.02±0.05 |
| Trabecular | ||||
| BV/TV (%) | 9.7±0.25 | 12.7±0.88† | 8.0±0.38 | 9.9±0.52* |
| Tb.N (1/mm) | 2.4±0.09 | 2.7±0.13* | 1.6±0.10 | 1.4±0.09 |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.04±0.001 | 0.05±0.002† | 0.05±0.002 | 0.07±0.001‡ |
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 0.22±0.01 | 0.23±0.01 | 0.28±0.01 | 0.33±0.03* |
| SMI | 2.0±0.04 | 2.0±0.05 | 2.4±0.28 | 2.3±0.10 |
| BMD (g/cm3) | 1.48±0.006 | 1.47±0.01 | 1.56±0.01 | 1.57±0.01 |
| Cortical | ||||
| Tt.Ar (mm2) | 0.6±0.02 | 0.7±0.01† | 0.7±0.02 | 0.8±0.04* |
| Ct.Ar (mm2) | 0.4±0.01 | 0.5±0.01 | 0.6±0.004 | 0.6±0.02 |
| Ma.Ar (mm2) | 0.19±0.008 | 0.26±0.008‡ | 0.16±0.008 | 0.12±0.039 |
| Ct.Th (mm) | 0.21±0.005 | 0.20±0.002 | 0.26±0.009 | 0.27±0.007 |
| J (mm4) | 0.05±0.003 | 0.07±0.003* | 0.08±0.007 | 0.09±0.007* |
| BMD (g/cm3) | 1.34±0.007 | 1.32±0.006 | 1.44±0.005 | 1.41±0.006† |
| Biomechanical | ||||
| Failure load (N) | 5.6±0.51 | 5.7±0.45 | 9.3±0.54 | 10.0±0.90 |
| Work to failure (mJ) | 2.4±0.31 | 2.0±0.22 | 3.0±0.27 | 3.0±0.26 |
| Load to maximum stiffness (N) | 2.7±0.35 | 2.1±0.27 | 5.5±0.8 | 5.7±0.5 |
| Maximum stiffness (N/mm) | 11.1±1.32 | 12.5±0.95 | 18.2±1.47 | 22.7±3.42 |
For trabecular data BV/TV, bone volume/tissue volume; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; SMI, structural model index. For cortical data Tt.Ar, total tissue area; Ct.Ar, cortical bone area; Ma.Ar, medullary area; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; J, polar moment of inertia. Significance from age-matched WT mice is denoted by *P<0.05, † P<0.01, ‡ P<0.001.
Figure 2SOCS2 regulation of systemic IGF1. (A) Transcript analysis of Igf1 and Igfbp3 in liver samples of 6-week-old male and female WT and Socs2 mice. Data represented relative to sex-matched WT as mean±s.e.m. (n=5). Significance from WT samples denoted by a P<0.05. (B) Graphs showing WT and Socs2 weight gain in response to twice daily GH (3 mg/kg) from 14 to 27 days of age. Data presented as mean±s.e.m. (n≥5). Significance from age-matched WT denoted by a P<0.05, b P<0.01, c P<0.001. (C) Western blotting analysis of phosphorylated (P−) STAT5 in 24-day-old WT (−GH (n=3); +GH (n=3)) and Socs2 (−GH (n=3); +GH (n=4)) liver samples following 15 min GH (3 mg/kg) treatment. Band intensities were quantified by densitometry and analysed for significance, as depicted in the graphs. Data presented as mean±s.e.m. (n≥3). Significance denoted by a P<0.05, c P<0.001. (D) Transcript analysis of Igf1 in liver samples from 27-day-old WT and Socs2 mice following 14 days twice daily GH (3 mg/kg) treatment. Data presented relative to untreated samples as mean±s.e.m. (n=5). (E) Protein analysis by ELISA of IGF1 levels in serum extracted from 27-day-old WT and Socs2 mice following 14 days twice daily GH (3 mg/kg) treatment.
Effects of SOCS2 on cortical bone development in male mice following 2 weeks rhGH (3 mg/kg) treatment. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. (n≥4)
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | GH | Control | GH | |
| Tt.Ar (mm2) | 1.33±0.051 | 1.30±0.070 | 1.27±0.050 | 1.45±0.070 |
| Ct.Ar (mm2) | 0.45±0.023 | 0.43±0.023 | 0.41±0.009 | 0.49±0.017† |
| Ma.Ar (mm2) | 0.88±0.032 | 0.87±0.048 | 0.86±0.050 | 0.96±0.061 |
| Ct.Th (mm) | 0.12±0.003 | 0.12±0.003 | 0.12±0.004 | 0.13±0.004 |
| J (mm4) | 0.17±.0.018 | 0.15±0.017 | 0.14±0.007 | 0.20±0.015* |
For cortical data Tt.Ar, total tissue area; Ct.Ar, cortical bone area; Ma.Ar, medullary area; Ct.Th, cortical thickness; J, polar moment of inertia. Significance from genotype-matched control group is denoted by *P<0.05, † P<0.01.
Figure 3SOCS2 regulation of GH-induced STAT signalling in osteoblasts and bone. (A) Transcript analysis of Socs1, Socs2 and Socs3 in WT osteoblasts following 24 h GH (500 ng/ml) or IGF1 (50 ng/ml) challenge. Transcript data represented relative to untreated samples as means±s.e.m. Significance denoted by c P<0.001. (B) Western blotting analysis of SOCS1, SOCS2 and SOCS3 in WT osteoblasts following 24 and 48 h GH (500 ng/ml) or IGF1 (50 ng/ml) treatment. (C) Western blotting analysis of phosphorylated (P−) STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 in WT and Socs2 osteoblasts challenged with GH (500 ng/ml) for up to 120 min. (D) Immunofluorescence detection of pSTAT5 in WT and Socs2 osteoblasts following 20 min GH (500 ng/ml) challenge. (E) Analysis of (P−), STAT5 in SOCS2 overexpressing MC3T3 osteoblast-like cells and negative control-transfected cells following challenge with GH (500 ng/ml) for up to 120 min. (F) Immunofluorescence detection of pSTAT5 in SOCS2 overexpressing MC3T3 cells following 20 min GH (500 ng/ml) challenge. Scale bars for immunofluorescence represent 50 μm. Nucleus, blue; pSTAT5, pink. (G) Analysis of (P−) STAT5 in bone samples extracted from 24-day-old WT and Socs2 mice following 15 min GH (3 mg/kg) treatment. Band intensities were quantified by densitometry and analysed for significance, as depicted in the graphs. Data presented as mean±s.e.m. (n=3). Significance denoted by b P<0.01.
Figure 4SOCS2 regulation of GH or IGF1-induced AKT and ERK1/2 signalling. (A) Western blotting analysis of phosphorylated (P−) AKT and (P−) ERK1/2 in WT and Socs2 osteoblasts challenged with GH (500 ng/ml) or IGF1 (50 ng/ml) for up to 30 min. (B) Analysis of phosphorylated (P−) STAT3 and STAT5 in WT and Socs2 osteoblasts challenged with IGF1 (50 ng/ml) for up to 30 min. c, GH-treated WT osteoblast acting as a positive control. (C) Analysis of phosphorylated (P−) AKT and ERK1/2 in bone samples extracted from WT and Socs2 mice following 15 min GH (3 mg/kg) treatment. Band intensities were quantified by densitometry and analysed for significance, as depicted in the graphs. Data presented as mean±s.e.m. (n=3).
Figure 5SOCS2 regulation of GH-induced IGF1 expression. (A) Transcript analysis of Igf1, Igfbp3 and Socs2 in WT and Socs2 osteoblasts following 48 h GH (500 ng/ml) treatment. (B) Protein analysis of IGF1 and IGFBP3 from conditioned medium from WT and Socs2 osteoblasts following 48 h GH (500 ng/ml) treatment. (C) Transcript analysis of Igf1 and Igfbp3 in bone samples extracted from 27-day-old male WT and Socs2 −/− mice following 14 days twice daily GH (3 mg/kg) treatment. (D) Transcript analysis of Igf1 and Igfbp3 in bone samples extracted from 6-week-old male and female WT and Socs2 −/− mice. All data represented as means±s.e.m. Significance from vehicle-treated samples denoted by a P<0.05, c P<0.001.