Literature DB >> 25074713

Dermal scarification versus intramuscular diclofenac sodium injection for the treatment of renal colic: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Stavros Ioannidis1, Spyridon Kampantais, Anastasios Ioannidis, Konstantinos Gkagkalidis, Ioannis Vakalopoulos, Chrysovalantis Toutziaris, Christos Patsialas, Leonidas Laskaridis, Panagiotis Dimopoulos, Georgios Dimitriadis.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine whether dermal scarification is equally effective for treating acute renal colic compared to diclofenac sodium intramuscular therapy. A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted with methodologic rigor based on CONSORT criteria. A total of 291 patients, aged ≥ 18 years, suffering from acute renal colic were included in this trial and randomly assigned in two groups. Patients in the first group (A) received endodermal injection (dermal scarification) of 1 ml normal saline at the area of intensity of pain. The second group (B) received 75 mg diclofenac sodium by intramuscular injection. The success of each method defined the primary end point. Pain intensity before and after treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale. The time onset and the duration of analgesia were also recorded. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding hematuria (p = 0.158), stone identification at KUB (p = 0.751) and mean pain intensity (p = 0.609) before treatment initiation. The method was successful in 75.5 % of patients in group A and 74.3 % of patients in group B (p = 0.812). Mean pain reduction was comparable, 5.65 ± 3.05 in group A and 5.34 ± 2.99 in group B (p = 0.379), with dermal scarification eliciting its effect considerably faster, whereas the duration of analgesia was longer in the diclofenac group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, dermal scarification could constitute an alternative method for treating renal colic as it is equally effective compared to the standard treatment of diclofenac sodium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25074713     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-014-0690-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  18 in total

Review 1.  The mechanism of acupuncture and clinical applications.

Authors:  Mehmet Tugrul Cabýoglu; Neyhan Ergene; Uner Tan
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.292

Review 2.  Conventional and alternative methods for providing analgesia in renal colic.

Authors:  Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Frank X Keeley
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Acupuncture in the treatment of renal colic.

Authors:  Y H Lee; W C Lee; M T Chen; J K Huang; C Chung; L S Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Demystifying acupuncture.

Authors:  D Pyne; N G Shenker
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  [Eye acupuncture for treatment of renal and ureteral colic].

Authors:  Qiang Lin; Yu-lian Hu; Chong-wei Han; Yan Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Zhen Jiu       Date:  2007-09

6.  Randomized trial of trigger point injection for renal colic.

Authors:  Masanori Iguchi; Yoshinari Katoh; Hiroyuki Koike; Taiji Hayashi; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 7.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Treatment of loin pain suspected to be renal colic with papaverine hydrochloride: a prospective double-blind randomised study.

Authors:  Seyed Alaeddin Asgari; Mani Mohiti Asli; Ali Hamidi Madani; Parvaneh Arab Maghsoudi; Mandana Mansour Ghanaei; Maryam Shakiba; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Ahmad Enshaei; Alireza Farzan; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  The meridian system and mechanism of acupuncture--a comparative review. Part 2: mechanism of acupuncture analgesia.

Authors:  Shyang Chang
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.705

10.  Local active warming: an effective treatment for pain, anxiety and nausea caused by renal colic.

Authors:  Alexander Kober; Michael Dobrovits; Bob Djavan; Michael Marberger; Renate Barker; Petra Bertalanffy; Thomas Scheck; Burkhard Gustorff; Klaus Hoerauf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Adjunctive Acupuncture on Pain Relief Among Emergency Department Patients With Acute Renal Colic Due to Urolithiasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Tu; Ying Cao; Li-Qiong Wang; Guang-Xia Shi; Lian-Cheng Jia; Bao-Li Liu; Wei-Hai Yao; Xiao-Lu Pei; Yan Cao; He-Wen Li; Shi-Yan Yan; Jing-Wen Yang; Zhi-Cheng Qu; Cun-Zhi Liu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.