Literature DB >> 25074388

Response to: Is inverted BMI really better than BMI in predicting body fatness in children?

M J Duncan1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25074388     DOI： 10.1038/ejcn.2014.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN： 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Can we use the Jackson and Pollock equations to predict body density/fat of obese individuals in the 21st century?

Authors:  A M Nevill; G S Metsios; A S Jackson; J Wang; J Thornton; D Gallagher
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2008-09-02

2.  Is inverted BMI really better than BMI in predicting body fatness in children?

Authors:  N Singhal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Body mass index: a measure of fatness or leanness?

Authors:  A M Nevill; R L Holder
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better predictor of DEXA determined body fatness in children.

Authors:  M J Duncan; C Martins; G Silva; E Marques; J Mota; L Aires
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Body mass index has a curvilinear relationship with the percentage of body fat among children.

Authors:  Bruno Federico; Filomena D'Aliesio; Fabio Pane; Giovanni Capelli; Angelo Rodio
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-08-18

6.  Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better proxy for percentage of body fat.

Authors:  Alan M Nevill; Antonios Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou; Giorgos S Metsios; Yiannis Koutedakis; Roger L Holder; George D Kitas; Mohammed A Mohammed
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 1.533

7.  BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity.

Authors:  K J Rothman
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.095
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.