BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Augmented Na(+) /Ca(2+) exchanger (NCX) activity may play a crucial role in cardiac arrhythmogenesis; however, data regarding the anti-arrhythmic efficacy of NCX inhibition are debatable. Feasible explanations could be the unsatisfactory selectivity of NCX inhibitors and/or the dependence of the experimental model on the degree of Ca(2+) i overload. Hence, we used NCX inhibitors SEA0400 and the more selective ORM10103 to evaluate the efficacy of NCX inhibition against arrhythmogenic Ca(2+) i rise in conditions when [Ca(2+) ]i was augmented via activation of the late sodium current (INaL ) or inhibition of the Na(+) /K(+) pump. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Action potentials (APs) were recorded from canine papillary muscles and Purkinje fibres by microelectrodes. NCX current (INCX ) was determined in ventricular cardiomyocytes utilizing the whole-cell patch clamp technique. Ca(2+) i transients (CaTs) were monitored with a Ca(2+) -sensitive fluorescent dye, Fluo-4. KEY RESULTS: Enhanced INaL increased the Ca(2+) load and AP duration (APD). SEA0400 and ORM10103 suppressed INCX and prevented/reversed the anemone toxin II (ATX-II)-induced [Ca(2+) ]i rise without influencing APD, CaT or cell shortening, or affecting the ATX-II-induced increased APD. ORM10103 significantly decreased the number of strophanthidin-induced spontaneous diastolic Ca(2+) release events; however, SEA0400 failed to restrict the veratridine-induced augmentation in Purkinje-ventricle APD dispersion. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Selective NCX inhibition - presumably by blocking rev INCX (reverse mode NCX current) - is effective against arrhythmogenesis caused by [Na(+) ]i -induced [Ca(2+) ]i elevation, without influencing the AP waveform. Therefore, selective INCX inhibition, by significantly reducing the arrhythmogenic trigger activity caused by the perturbed Ca(2+) i handling, should be considered as a promising anti-arrhythmic therapeutic strategy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Augmented Na(+) /Ca(2+) exchanger (NCX) activity may play a crucial role in cardiac arrhythmogenesis; however, data regarding the anti-arrhythmic efficacy of NCX inhibition are debatable. Feasible explanations could be the unsatisfactory selectivity of NCX inhibitors and/or the dependence of the experimental model on the degree of Ca(2+) i overload. Hence, we used NCX inhibitors SEA0400 and the more selective ORM10103 to evaluate the efficacy of NCX inhibition against arrhythmogenicCa(2+) i rise in conditions when [Ca(2+) ]i was augmented via activation of the late sodium current (INaL ) or inhibition of the Na(+) /K(+) pump. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Action potentials (APs) were recorded from canine papillary muscles and Purkinje fibres by microelectrodes. NCX current (INCX ) was determined in ventricular cardiomyocytes utilizing the whole-cell patch clamp technique. Ca(2+) i transients (CaTs) were monitored with a Ca(2+) -sensitive fluorescent dye, Fluo-4. KEY RESULTS: Enhanced INaL increased the Ca(2+) load and AP duration (APD). SEA0400 and ORM10103 suppressed INCX and prevented/reversed the anemone toxin II (ATX-II)-induced [Ca(2+) ]i rise without influencing APD, CaT or cell shortening, or affecting the ATX-II-induced increased APD. ORM10103 significantly decreased the number of strophanthidin-induced spontaneous diastolic Ca(2+) release events; however, SEA0400 failed to restrict the veratridine-induced augmentation in Purkinje-ventricle APD dispersion. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Selective NCX inhibition - presumably by blocking rev INCX (reverse mode NCX current) - is effective against arrhythmogenesis caused by [Na(+) ]i -induced [Ca(2+) ]i elevation, without influencing the AP waveform. Therefore, selective INCX inhibition, by significantly reducing the arrhythmogenic trigger activity caused by the perturbed Ca(2+) i handling, should be considered as a promising anti-arrhythmic therapeutic strategy.
Authors: Norbert Nagy; Károly Acsai; Anita Kormos; Zsuzsanna Sebők; Attila S Farkas; Norbert Jost; Péter P Nánási; Julius Gy Papp; András Varró; András Tóth Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Michael Spedding; John A Peters; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: N Jost; N Nagy; C Corici; Z Kohajda; A Horváth; K Acsai; P Biliczki; J Levijoki; P Pollesello; T Koskelainen; L Otsomaa; A Tóth; J Gy Papp; A Varró; L Virág Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Christopher Southan; Michael Spedding; Wenyuan Yu; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Zsófia Kohajda; Nikolett Farkas-Morvay; Norbert Jost; Norbert Nagy; Amir Geramipour; András Horváth; Richárd S Varga; Tibor Hornyik; Claudia Corici; Károly Acsai; Balázs Horváth; János Prorok; Balázs Ördög; Szilvia Déri; Dániel Tóth; Jouko Levijoki; Piero Pollesello; Tuula Koskelainen; Leena Otsomaa; András Tóth; István Baczkó; István Leprán; Péter P Nánási; Julius Gy Papp; András Varró; László Virág Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nils Bögeholz; Jan S Schulte; Sven Kaese; B Klemens Bauer; Paul Pauls; Dirk G Dechering; Gerrit Frommeyer; Joshua I Goldhaber; Uwe Kirchhefer; Lars Eckardt; Christian Pott; Frank U Müller Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 5.810