Literature DB >> 25073831

Racial disparities in adoption of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphedema risk in women with breast cancer.

Dalliah M Black1, Jing Jiang2, Henry M Kuerer1, Thomas A Buchholz3, Benjamin D Smith4.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Racial disparities exist in many aspects of breast cancer care. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was developed to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for staging early breast cancer to minimize complications. Racial disparities in the use of SLNB remain incompletely characterized, and their effect on lymphedema risk is not known.
OBJECTIVE: To determine racial differences in SLNB use among patients with pathologically node-negative breast cancer during the period when SLNB became the preferred method for axillary staging as well as whether such differences affect lymphedema risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked database from 2002 through 2007 to identify cases of incident, nonmetastatic, pathologically node-negative breast cancer in women aged 66 years or older. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Sentinel lymph node biopsy use and 5-year cumulative incidence of lymphedema by race.
RESULTS: Of 31 274 women identified, 1767 (5.6%) were black, 27 856 (89.1%) were white, and 1651 (5.3%) were of other or unknown race. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 73.7% of white patients and 62.4% of black patients (P < .001). The use of SLNB increased by year for both black and white patients (P < .001); however, a fixed disparity of approximately 12 percentage points in SLNB use persisted through 2007. In adjusted analysis, black patients were significantly less likely than white patients to undergo SLNB (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.75; P < .001). Overall, the 5-year cumulative lymphedema risk was 8.2% in whites and 12.3% in blacks (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.23-1.67; P < .001). When stratified by type of axillary surgery, 5-year lymphedema risk was 6.8% in whites undergoing SLNB (HR, 1 [reference]), 8.8% in blacks undergoing SLNB (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02-1.60; P = .03), 12.2% in whites undergoing ALND (1.79; 1.63-1.96; P < .001), and 18.0% in blacks undergoing ALND (2.76; 2.25-3.39; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although SLNB use increased in both black and white patients with pathologically node-negative breast cancer from 2002 through 2007, the rates of SLNB remained lower in black than white patients during this entire period by approximately 12 percentage points. This racial disparity in SLNB use contributed to racial disparities in lymphedema risk. Improvements in the dissemination of new techniques are needed to avoid disparities in breast cancer care and patient outcomes, particularly in disadvantaged groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25073831      PMCID: PMC5853102          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  26 in total

1.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy lowers the rate of lymphedema when compared with standard axillary lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; W Jason Martin; Kambiz Dowlatshahi
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  The role of organizational affiliations and research networks in the diffusion of breast cancer treatment innovation.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; John Bainbridge; Anne-Marie Meyer; Keith D Amos; Bryan J Weiner; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Lymphedema after sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S F Sener; D J Winchester; C H Martz; J L Feldman; J A Cavanaugh; D P Winchester; B Weigel; K Bonnefoi; K Kirby; C Morehead
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Morbidity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) alone versus SLN and completion axillary lymph node dissection after breast cancer surgery: a prospective Swiss multicenter study on 659 patients.

Authors:  Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Gilles Berclaz; Ossi R Koechli; Gabriel Schaer; Mathias K Fehr; Thomas Hess; Daniel Oertli; Lucio Bronz; Beate Schnarwyler; Edward Wight; Urs Uehlinger; Eduard Infanger; Daniel Burger; Markus Zuber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: ten-year results of a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Giuseppe Viale; Giovanni Paganelli; Stefano Zurrida; Alberto Luini; Viviana Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi; Mattia Intra; Patrick Maisonneuve; Francesca Zucca; Giovanna Gatti; Giovanni Mazzarol; Concetta De Cicco; Dario Vezzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The validity of race and ethnicity in enrollment data for Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Alan M Zaslavsky; John Z Ayanian; Lawrence B Zaborski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011.

Authors:  Anthony Lucci; Linda Mackie McCall; Peter D Beitsch; Patrick W Whitworth; Douglas S Reintgen; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukumal Saha; Kelly K Hunt; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Racial differences in definitive breast cancer therapy in older women: are they explained by the hospitals where patients undergo surgery?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Elena Kouri; Yulei He; Jane C Weeks; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Long-term complications associated with breast-conservation surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Funda Meric; Thomas A Buchholz; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Raphael E Pollock; S Eva Singletary; Barry W Feig; Henry M Kuerer; Lisa A Newman; George H Perkins; Eric A Strom; Marsha D McNeese; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer: an update on the NCCN clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.908

View more
  16 in total

1.  Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Lori J Pierce; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Prevalence and Consequences of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in the Era of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tina W F Yen; Purushottam W Laud; Liliana E Pezzin; Emily L McGinley; Erica Wozniak; Rodney Sparapani; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Does race predict survival for women with invasive breast cancer?

Authors:  Siún M Walsh; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Survivorship, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Crystal S Denlinger; Tara Sanft; K Scott Baker; Gregory Broderick; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Debra L Friedman; Mindy Goldman; Melissa Hudson; Nazanin Khakpour; Allison King; Divya Koura; Robin M Lally; Terry S Langbaum; Allison L McDonough; Michelle Melisko; Jose G Montoya; Kathi Mooney; Javid J Moslehi; Tracey O'Connor; Linda Overholser; Electra D Paskett; Jeffrey Peppercorn; William Pirl; M Alma Rodriguez; Kathryn J Ruddy; Paula Silverman; Sophia Smith; Karen L Syrjala; Amye Tevaarwerk; Susan G Urba; Mark T Wakabayashi; Phyllis Zee; Nicole R McMillian; Deborah A Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Breast Cancer Disparities at Home and Abroad: A Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for System-Level Change.

Authors:  Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Understanding age and race disparities in the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Archana Radhakrishnan; Paula Silverman; Craig Evan Pollack; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Robert Shenk; Cheryl L Thompson
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Race/ethnicity, genetic ancestry, and breast cancer-related lymphedema in the Pathways Study.

Authors:  Marilyn L Kwan; Song Yao; Valerie S Lee; Janise M Roh; Qianqian Zhu; Isaac J Ergas; Qian Liu; Yali Zhang; Susan E Kutner; Charles P Quesenberry; Christine B Ambrosone; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Disparities in Use of Human Epidermal Growth Hormone Receptor 2-Targeted Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Katherine Reeder-Hayes; Sharon Peacock Hinton; Ke Meng; Lisa A Carey; Stacie B Dusetzina
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Trends in Local Therapy Utilization and Cost for Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Older Women: Implications for Payment and Policy Reform.

Authors:  Shervin M Shirvani; Jing Jiang; Anna Likhacheva; Karen E Hoffman; Simona F Shaitelman; Abigail Caudle; Thomas A Buchholz; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Influence of rurality on lymph node assessment among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and treated with mastectomy, SEER 2000-2015.

Authors:  Danielle Riley; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Ingrid M Lizarraga; Mary Charlton; Brian J Smith; Charles F Lynch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.