Literature DB >> 25073816

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis comparing diverse effects of detomidine, medetomidine, and dexmedetomidine in the horse: a population analysis.

K N Grimsrud1, S Ait-Oudhia, B P Durbin-Johnson, D M Rocke, K R Mama, M L Rezende, S D Stanley, W J Jusko.   

Abstract

The present study characterizes the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships of the α2-adrenergic receptor agonists detomidine (DET), medetomidine (MED) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) in parallel groups of horses from in vivo data after single bolus doses. Head height (HH), heart rate (HR), and blood glucose concentrations were measured over 6 h. Compartmental PK and minimal physiologically based PK (mPBPK) models were applied and incorporated into basic and extended indirect response models (IRM). Population PK/PD analysis was conducted using the Monolix software implementing the stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm. Marked reductions in HH and HR were found. The drug concentrations required to obtain inhibition at half-maximal effect (IC50 ) were approximately four times larger for DET than MED and DEX for both HH and HR. These effects were not gender dependent. Medetomidine had a greater influence on the increase in glucose concentration than DEX. The developed models demonstrate the use of mechanistic and mPBPK/PD models for the analysis of clinically obtainable in vivo data.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25073816      PMCID: PMC4286451          DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0140-7783            Impact factor:   1.786


  40 in total

1.  Modeling of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships: concepts and perspectives.

Authors:  H Derendorf; B Meibohm
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Cardiac output in horses.

Authors:  E W FISHER; R G DALTON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1959-12-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Integration and modelling of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to optimize dosage regimens in veterinary medicine.

Authors:  P L Toutain; P Lees
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.786

4.  Clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of medetomidine and its enantiomers in dogs.

Authors:  E Kuusela; M Raekallio; M Anttila; I Falck; S Mölsä; O Vainio
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.786

5.  Estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir in HIV patients with the MONOLIX software.

Authors:  Marc Lavielle; France Mentré
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Cardiopulmonary effects and pharmacokinetics of i.v. dexmedetomidine in ponies.

Authors:  R Bettschart-Wolfensberger; S L Freeman; I M Bowen; F S Aliabadi; R Weller; M Huhtinen; K W Clarke
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Effects of medetomidine on serum insulin and plasma glucose concentrations in clinically normal dogs.

Authors:  S A Burton; K A Lemke; S L Ihle; A L Mackenzie
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Dexmedetomidine decreases thiopental dose requirement and alters distribution pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M Bührer; A Mappes; R Lauber; D R Stanski; P O Maitre
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Selectivity of atipamezole, yohimbine and tolazoline for alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes: implications for clinical reversal of alpha-2 adrenergic receptor mediated sedation in sheep.

Authors:  D D Schwartz; T P Clark
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.786

10.  Genetic analysis of growth curves using the SAEM algorithm.

Authors:  Florence Jaffrézic; Cristian Meza; Marc Lavielle; Jean-Louis Foulley
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effect of different sedative doses of dexmedetomidine on the intestinal motility in clinically healthy donkeys (Equus asinus).

Authors:  Marwa Abass; Hussam Ibrahim; Hakan Salci; Mohamed A Hamed
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A Double-Blinded, Randomized Comparison of Medetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam and Dexmedetomidine-Tiletamine-Zolazepam Anesthesia in Free-Ranging Brown Bears (Ursus Arctos).

Authors:  Núria Fandos Esteruelas; Marc Cattet; Andreas Zedrosser; Gordon B Stenhouse; Susanne Küker; Alina L Evans; Jon M Arnemo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Blood glucose and insulin concentrations after alpha-2-agonists administration in horses with and without insulin dysregulation.

Authors:  Janice E Kritchevsky; Genevieve S Muir; Dakota H Z Leschke; Jack K Hodgson; Emily K Hess; Francois-Rene Bertin
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Physiological and Clinical Responses in Pigs in Relation to Plasma Concentrations during Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine, Tiletamine, Zolazepam, and Butorphanol.

Authors:  Anneli Rydén; Marianne Jensen-Waern; Görel Nyman; Lena Olsén
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.