UNLABELLED: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA ALCL) is a newly described clinicopathologic entity. The purpose of this study is to describe the imaging findings of patients with BIA ALCL and determine their sensitivity and specificity in the detection of the presence of an effusion or a mass related to BIA ALCL. A retrospective search was performed of our files as well as of the world literature for patients with pathologically proven BIA ALCL who had been assessed by any imaging study including ultrasound (US), computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, as well as mammography. The sensitivity and specificity of each imaging modality in the detection of an effusion or a mass around breast implants was determined. We identified 44 patients who had BIA ALCL and imaging studies performed between 1997 and 2013. The sensitivity for detecting an effusion was 84, 55, 82, and 38 %, and for detecting a mass was 46, 50, 50, and 64 %, by US, CT, MRI, and PET, respectively. The sensitivity of mammography in the detection of an abnormality without distinction of effusion or mass was 73 %, and specificity 50 %. Progression-free survival was worse in patients with an implant-associated mass (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Current imaging with US, CT, MR, and PET appears suboptimal in the detection of an imaging abnormality associated with BIA ALCL. This under diagnosis may reflect a lack of awareness of this rare entity suggesting the need for better understanding of the spectrum of imaging findings associated with BIA ALCL by breast imagers.
UNLABELLED: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA ALCL) is a newly described clinicopathologic entity. The purpose of this study is to describe the imaging findings of patients with BIA ALCL and determine their sensitivity and specificity in the detection of the presence of an effusion or a mass related to BIA ALCL. A retrospective search was performed of our files as well as of the world literature for patients with pathologically proven BIA ALCL who had been assessed by any imaging study including ultrasound (US), computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, as well as mammography. The sensitivity and specificity of each imaging modality in the detection of an effusion or a mass around breast implants was determined. We identified 44 patients who had BIA ALCL and imaging studies performed between 1997 and 2013. The sensitivity for detecting an effusion was 84, 55, 82, and 38 %, and for detecting a mass was 46, 50, 50, and 64 %, by US, CT, MRI, and PET, respectively. The sensitivity of mammography in the detection of an abnormality without distinction of effusion or mass was 73 %, and specificity 50 %. Progression-free survival was worse in patients with an implant-associated mass (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Current imaging with US, CT, MR, and PET appears suboptimal in the detection of an imaging abnormality associated with BIA ALCL. This under diagnosis may reflect a lack of awareness of this rare entity suggesting the need for better understanding of the spectrum of imaging findings associated with BIA ALCL by breast imagers.
Authors: Tessa L St Cyr; Barbara A Pockaj; Donald W Northfelt; Fiona E Craig; Mark W Clemens; Raman C Mahabir Journal: Plast Surg (Oakv) Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 0.947
Authors: Mark W Clemens; Ryan C DeCoster; Berry Fairchild; Alexander A Bessonov; Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo Journal: Semin Plast Surg Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 2.314
Authors: Mark W Clemens; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Charles E Butler; Kelly K Hunt; Michelle A Fanale; Steven Horwitz; Dennis D Weisenburger; Jun Liu; Elizabeth A Morgan; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Vinita Parkash; Jing Ning; Aliyah R Sohani; Judith A Ferry; Neha Mehta-Shah; Ahmed Dogan; Hui Liu; Nora Thormann; Arianna Di Napoli; Arianna DiNapoli; Stephen Lade; Jorge Piccolini; Ruben Reyes; Travis Williams; Colleen M McCarthy; Summer E Hanson; Loretta J Nastoupil; Rakesh Gaur; Yasuhiro Oki; Ken H Young; Roberto N Miranda Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher S Parham; Summer E Hanson; Charles E Butler; M Bradley Calobrace; Raylene Hollrah; Terri Macgregor; Mark W Clemens Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2021-01
Authors: Elaine S Jaffe; Binita S Ashar; Mark W Clemens; Andrew L Feldman; Philippe Gaulard; Roberto N Miranda; Aliyah R Sohani; Timothy Stenzel; Sung W Yoon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kirill A Lyapichev; Sergio Piña-Oviedo; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Mark G Evans; Hui Liu; Alonso R Miranda; Kelly K Hunt; Mark W Clemens; John M Stewart; Mitual B Amin; Andres E Quesada; Siaw Ming Chai; Arianna Di Napoli; Arthy Yoga; Sanat K Dave; Ignacio I Wistuba; Yun Wu; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Ellen J Schlette; Maria C Ferrufino-Schmidt; Sanam Loghavi; Joseph D Khoury; Ken H Young; Roberto N Miranda Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Julian Kricheldorff; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Christine Solbach; Claudia Gerber-Schäfer; Christoph Rancsó; Uwe von Fritschen Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 5.594