Literature DB >> 25073515

Circulating levels and clinical implications of epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin-1 in women with breast cancer: can their ratio improve the results?

Abdelfattah M Attallah1, Mohamed El-Far, Mohamed M Omran, Sanaa O Abdallah, Mohamed A El-Desouky, Ibrahim El-Dosoky, Mohamed A Abdelrazek, Ahmed A Attallah, Mohamed A Elweresh, Gamal E Abdel Hameed, Hadil A Shawki, Karim S Salama, Ahmed M El-Waseef.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemical studies proved that the presence of breast cancer (BrCa) is accompanied by elevated levels of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and decreased levels of cytokeratin-1 (CK1). We, therefore, hypothesize that the serum EMA/CK1 ratio may serve as a promising biomarker for early diagnosis of breast cancer. The circulating levels of EMA and CK1 were determined by Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in sera from 102 women with BrCa and 90 women as controls (40 with benign breast disease and 50 healthy). EMA at 130 kDa and CK1 at 67 kDa were identified, purified, and quantified in sera of BrCa patients using ELISA. EMA/CK1 ratio values were found to discriminate BrCa patients from controls (P < 0.0001) with high diagnostic ability (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.901, sensitivity = 82, specificity = 76). The sensitivity and specificity for early-stage (≤ T2) BrCa were 72 and 76%, respectively. The ratio values of patients with late-stage (>T2) tumors were significantly higher than those of patients with early-stage (≤ T2) tumors. Moreover, higher grades (grades 2-3) were associated with higher values than grade 1 tumors. AUC values in different BrCa patients who had early stage, low grade, or size ≤ 2 cm were 0.855, 0.762, and 0.839, respectively. AUC values of patients with positive lymph node or positive distant metastasis were 0.907 and 0.913, respectively. We show for the first time the impact of serum EMA and CK1 ratio in BrCa detection. Differential EMA/CK1 values may serve as a diagnostic marker in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25073515     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2375-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  47 in total

1.  Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CA27.29 and CA15.3 in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M Gion; R Mione; A E Leon; R Dittadi
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Evaluation of cytokeratin-1 in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Abdelfattah M Attallah; Mohamed El-Far; Camelia A Abdel Malak; Faten Zahran; Khaled Farid; Mohamed M Omran; Hayat Zagloul; Mohamed S El-Deen
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  MUC1 oncogene amplification correlates with protein overexpression in invasive breast carcinoma cells.

Authors:  E Lacunza; M Baudis; A G Colussi; A Segal-Eiras; M V Croce; M C Abba
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2010-09

5.  Ductal epithelial proliferations of the breast: a biological continuum? Comparative genomic hybridization and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin expression patterns.

Authors:  W Boecker; H Buerger; K Schmitz; I A Ellis; P J van Diest; H P Sinn; J Geradts; R Diallo; C Poremba; H Herbst
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 6.  Tumor markers in breast cancer--evaluation of their clinical usefulness.

Authors:  Petra Marić; Petar Ozretić; Sonja Levanat; Slavko Oresković; Katarina Antunac; Lidija Beketić-Oresković
Journal:  Coll Antropol       Date:  2011-03

7.  Effect of a diet and physical activity intervention on body weight and nutritional patterns in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  N Travier; A Fonseca-Nunes; C Javierre; E Guillamo; L Arribas; I Peiró; G Buckland; F Moreno; A Urruticoechea; G R Oviedo; A Roca; L Hurtós; V Ortega; M Muñoz; L Garrigós; B Cirauqui; S Del Barco; A Arcusa; M A Seguí; J M Borràs; C A Gonzalez; A Agudo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Frequent alteration of the DF3 tumor-associated antigen gene in primary human breast carcinomas.

Authors:  G R Merlo; J Siddiqui; C S Cropp; D S Liscia; R Lidereau; R Callahan; D W Kufe
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Expression of mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC6) and their prognostic significance in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Richard W G Boyce; Dalia Abd El-Rehim; Thomas Kurien; Andrew R Green; Emma C Paish; John F R Robertson; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 10.  MUC1-C oncoprotein as a target in breast cancer: activation of signaling pathways and therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  D W Kufe
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances in breast cancer screening modalities and status of global screening programs.

Authors:  Chenyu Luo; Le Wang; Yuhan Zhang; Ming Lu; Bin Lu; Jie Cai; Hongda Chen; Min Dai
Journal:  Chronic Dis Transl Med       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  BC-DETECT: combined detection of serum HE4 and TFF3 improves breast cancer diagnostic efficacy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Abdelrazek; Ahmed Nageb; Lamiaa A Barakat; Amr Abouzid; Rizk Elbaz
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Human omental adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium alters the proteomic profile of epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro.

Authors:  Yanling Zhang; Weihong Dong; Junjie Wang; Jing Cai; Zehua Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A Circulating miRNA Signature for Stratification of Breast Lesions among Women with Abnormal Screening Mammograms.

Authors:  Sau Yeen Loke; Prabhakaran Munusamy; Geok Ling Koh; Claire Hian Tzer Chan; Preetha Madhukumar; Jee Liang Thung; Kiat Tee Benita Tan; Kong Wee Ong; Wei Sean Yong; Yirong Sim; Chung Lie Oey; Sue Zann Lim; Mun Yew Patrick Chan; Teng Swan Juliana Ho; Boon Kheng James Khoo; Su Lin Jill Wong; Choon Hua Thng; Bee Kiang Chong; Ern Yu Tan; Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan; Ann Siew Gek Lee
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Alterations of PTEN and SMAD4 methylation in diagnosis of breast cancer: implications of methyl II PCR assay.

Authors:  Menha Swellam; Entsar A Saad; Shimaa Sabry; Adel Denewer; Camelia Abdel Malak; Amr Abouzid
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-06

Review 6.  Breast Cancer; Discovery of Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers, Drug Resistance, and Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Samia Afzal; Muhammad Hassan; Safi Ullah; Hazrat Abbas; Farah Tawakkal; Mohsin Ahmad Khan
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-02-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.