Literature DB >> 25073473

Translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling for an orally available novel inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase and c-Ros oncogene 1.

Shinji Yamazaki1, Justine L Lam2, Helen Y Zou2, Hui Wang2, Tod Smeal2, Paolo Vicini2.   

Abstract

An orally available macrocyclic small molecule, PF06463922 [(10R)-7-amino-12-fluoro-2,10,16-trimethyl-15-oxo-10,15,16,17-tetrahydro-2H-8,4-(metheno)pyrazolo[4,3-h][2,5,11]benzoxadiazacyclotetradecine-3-carbonitrile], is a selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-Ros oncogene 1 (ROS1). The objectives of the present study were to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of PF06463922 between its systemic exposures, pharmacodynamic biomarker (target modulation), and pharmacologic response (antitumor efficacy) in athymic mice implanted with H3122 non-small cell lung carcinomas expressing echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK mutation (EML4-ALK(L1196M)) and with NIH3T3 cells expressing CD74-ROS1. In these nonclinical tumor models, PF06463922 was orally administered to animals with EML4-ALK(L1196M) and CD74-ROS1 at twice daily doses of 0.3-20 and 0.01-3 mg/kg per dose, respectively. Plasma concentration-time profiles of PF06463922 were adequately described by a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Using the model-simulated plasma concentrations, a pharmacodynamic indirect response model with a modulator sufficiently fit the time courses of target modulation (i.e., ALK phosphorylation) in tumors of EML4-ALK(L1196M)-driven models with EC50,in vivo of 36 nM free. A drug-disease model based on an indirect response model reasonably fit individual tumor growth curves in both EML4-ALK(L1196M)- and CD74-ROS1-driven models with the estimated tumor stasis concentrations of 51 and 6.2 nM free, respectively. Thus, the EC60,in vivo (52 nM free) for ALK inhibition roughly corresponded to the tumor stasis concentration in an EML4-ALK(L1196M)-driven model, suggesting that 60% ALK inhibition would be required for tumor stasis. Accordingly, we proposed that the EC60,in vivo for ALK inhibition corresponding to the tumor stasis could be considered a minimum target efficacious concentration of PF06463922 for cancer patients in a phase I trial.
Copyright © 2014 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25073473     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.114.217141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  10 in total

Review 1.  New Treatment Options for ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Laird Cameron; Benjamin Solomon
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-10

2.  Biomarker- versus drug-driven tumor growth inhibition models: an equivalence analysis.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Sardu; Italo Poggesi; Giuseppe De Nicolao
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  Therapeutic targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in lung cancer: a paradigm for precision cancer medicine.

Authors:  Ryohei Katayama; Christine M Lovly; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  PF-06463922, an ALK/ROS1 Inhibitor, Overcomes Resistance to First and Second Generation ALK Inhibitors in Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Helen Y Zou; Luc Friboulet; David P Kodack; Lars D Engstrom; Qiuhua Li; Melissa West; Ruth W Tang; Hui Wang; Konstantinos Tsaparikos; Jinwei Wang; Sergei Timofeevski; Ryohei Katayama; Dac M Dinh; Hieu Lam; Justine L Lam; Shinji Yamazaki; Wenyue Hu; Bhushankumar Patel; Divya Bezwada; Rosa L Frias; Eugene Lifshits; Sidra Mahmood; Justin F Gainor; Timothy Affolter; Patrick B Lappin; Hovhannes Gukasyan; Nathan Lee; Shibing Deng; Rakesh K Jain; Ted W Johnson; Alice T Shaw; Valeria R Fantin; Tod Smeal
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models that incorporate drug-target binding kinetics.

Authors:  Fereidoon Daryaee; Peter J Tonge
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Treatment of ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Recent Progress and Future Directions.

Authors:  Laird Cameron; Benjamin Solomon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Roadmap on plasticity and epigenetics in cancer.

Authors:  Jasmine Foo; David Basanta; Russell C Rockne; Carly Strelez; Curran Shah; Kimya Ghaffarian; Shannon M Mumenthaler; Kelly Mitchell; Justin D Lathia; David Frankhouser; Sergio Branciamore; Ya-Huei Kuo; Guido Marcucci; Robert Vander Velde; Andriy Marusyk; Sui Huang; Kishore Hari; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Haralampos Hatzikirou; Kamrine E Poels; Mary E Spilker; Blerta Shtylla; Mark Robertson-Tessi; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.959

8.  NPM/ALK mutants resistant to ASP3026 display variable sensitivity to alternative ALK inhibitors but succumb to the novel compound PF-06463922.

Authors:  Luca Mologni; Monica Ceccon; Alessandra Pirola; Gianpaolo Chiriano; Rocco Piazza; Leonardo Scapozza; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-20

9.  Silencing of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase ROR1 Inhibits Tumor-Cell Proliferation via PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yanchun Liu; Hui Yang; Tianxing Chen; Yongbin Luo; Zheyuan Xu; Ying Li; Jiahui Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The ALK inhibitor PF-06463922 is effective as a single agent in neuroblastoma driven by expression of ALK and MYCN.

Authors:  J Guan; E R Tucker; H Wan; D Chand; L S Danielson; K Ruuth; A El Wakil; B Witek; Y Jamin; G Umapathy; S P Robinson; T W Johnson; T Smeal; T Martinsson; L Chesler; R H Palmer; B Hallberg
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.758

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.