Literature DB >> 25072829

Effect of Implant Diameter and Ridge Dimension on Stress Distribution in Mandibular First Molar Sites-A Photoelastic Study.

Deborah Termeie1, Perry R Klokkevold2, Angelo A Caputo3.   

Abstract

The long-term clinical success of a dental implant is dependent upon maintaining sufficient osseointegration to resist forces of occlusion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of implant diameter on stress distribution around screw-type dental implants in mandibular first molar sites using photoelastic models. The design included models with different buccal-lingual dimension. Twelve composite photoelastic models were assembled using 2 different resins to simulate trabecular and cortical bone. Half of the models were fabricated with average dimensions for ridge width and the other half with narrower buccal-lingual dimensions. One internal connection implant (13 mm length) with either a standard (4 mm), wide (5 mm), or narrow (3.3 mm) diameter was embedded in the first molar position of each photoelastic model. Half the implants were tapered and the other half were straight. Full gold crowns in the shape of a mandibular first molar were fabricated and attached to the implants. Vertical and angled loads of 15 and 30 pounds were applied to specific points on the crown. Wide-diameter implants produced the least stress in all ridges while narrow-diameter implants generated the highest stress, especially in narrow ridges. It may be that the volume and quality of bone surrounding implants influences stress distribution with a greater ratio of cortical to trabecular bone, thus providing better support. Models with wide-diameter implants loaded axially had a more symmetrical stress distribution compared to standard and narrow diameter implants. A more asymmetrical stress pattern developed along the entire implant length with angled loads. Implant diameter and ridge width had considerable influence on stress distribution. Narrow-diameter implants produced more stress than wide diameter implants in all conditions tested.

Keywords:  bone configuration; dental implants; photoelastic models; stress distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25072829     DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  2 in total

1.  A 10 years retrospective study of assessment of prevalence and risk factors of dental implants failures.

Authors:  Rohit Singh; Anuj Singh Parihar; Vikas Vaibhav; Kunal Kumar; Revati Singh; Jeethu John Jerry
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-03-26

2.  Factors Affecting the Survival Rate of Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sonal Raikar; Pratim Talukdar; Sarala Kumari; Sangram Kumar Panda; Vinni Mary Oommen; Arvind Prasad
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-12-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.