Literature DB >> 25072764

Using the number needed to treat to assess appropriate antimicrobial therapy as a determinant of outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock.

Cristina Vazquez-Guillamet1, Michael Scolari, Marya D Zilberberg, Andrew F Shorr, Scott T Micek, Marin Kollef.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess appropriate antimicrobial therapy as an outcome determinant in severe sepsis and septic shock using the number needed to treat.
DESIGN: Single-center cohort study (January 2008 to December 2012).
SETTING: One thousand two hundred fifty-bed academic hospital. PATIENTS: Two thousand five hundred ninety-four patients with positive blood culture.
INTERVENTIONS: We retrospectively identified patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Inappropriate antimicrobial treatment was defined as an antimicrobial regimen that lacked in vitro activity against the isolated pathogen. Information regarding demographics, severity of illness, comorbidities, microbiology, and antimicrobial treatment was recorded. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for hospital mortality and inappropriate treatment.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-seven patients (30.3%) were nonsurvivors. Inappropriate antimicrobial treatment had the greatest adjusted odds ratio for hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.8-4.1; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified resistance to cefepime, resistance to meropenem, presence of multidrug resistance, nonabdominal surgery, and prior antibiotic use as being independently associated with the administration of inappropriate antimicrobial treatment. For the entire cohort, the number needed to treat with appropriate antimicrobial therapy to prevent one patient death was 4.0 (95% CI, 3.7-4.3). The prevalence-adjusted pathogen-specific number needed to treat (PNNT) with appropriate antimicrobial therapy to prevent one patient death was lowest for multidrug-resistant bacteria (PNNT = 20) followed by Candida species (PNNT = 34), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (PNNT = 38), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PNNT = 38), Escherichia coli (PNNT = 40), and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (PNNT = 47).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the importance of appropriate antimicrobial treatment as a determinant of outcome in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Our analyses suggest that improved targeting of empiric antimicrobials for multidrug-resistant bacteria, Candida species, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa would have the greatest impact in reducing mortality from inappropriate antimicrobial treatment in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25072764     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  25 in total

1.  Continuous infusion of beta-lactams: a blissful option for the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Marya D Zilberberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Top Guns: The "Maverick" and "Goose" of Empiric Therapy.

Authors:  Stephen W Davies; Jimmy T Efird; Christopher A Guidry; Zachary C Dietch; Rhett N Willis; Puja M Shah; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.150

3.  Impact of Baseline Characteristics on Future Episodes of Bloodstream Infections: Multistate Model in Septic Patients With Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  M Cristina Vazquez Guillamet; Rodrigo Vazquez; Jonas Noe; Scott T Micek; Victoria J Fraser; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Foster Gesten; Hallie C Prescott; Marcus E Friedrich; Theodore J Iwashyna; Gary S Phillips; Stanley Lemeshow; Tiffany Osborn; Kathleen M Terry; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  [Therapeutic drug monitoring and individual dosing of antibiotics during sepsis : Modern or just "trendy"?]

Authors:  A Brinkmann; A C Röhr; A Köberer; T Fuchs; J Preisenberger; W A Krüger; O R Frey
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 6.  Early goal-directed resuscitation of patients with septic shock: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Ravi G Gupta; Sarah M Hartigan; Markos G Kashiouris; Curtis N Sessler; Gonzalo M L Bearman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  An elevated percentage of reticulated platelet is associated with increased mortality in septic shock patients.

Authors:  Qin Wu; Jianan Ren; Dong Hu; Pengjun Jiang; Guanwei Li; Nadeem Anjum; Gefei Wang; Guosheng Gu; Jun Chen; Xiuwen Wu; Song Liu; Yuan Li; Yunzhao Zhao; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  A cohort study of bacteremic pneumonia: The importance of antibiotic resistance and appropriate initial therapy?

Authors:  Cristina Vazquez Guillamet; Rodrigo Vazquez; Jonas Noe; Scott T Micek; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Quality indicators in intensive care medicine for Germany - third edition 2017.

Authors:  Oliver Kumpf; Jan-Peter Braun; Alexander Brinkmann; Hanswerner Bause; Martin Bellgardt; Frank Bloos; Rolf Dubb; Clemens Greim; Arnold Kaltwasser; Gernot Marx; Reimer Riessen; Claudia Spies; Jörg Weimann; Gabriele Wöbker; Elke Muhl; Christian Waydhas
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-01

10.  Application strategy of PiCCO in septic shock patients.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Liu; Wenli Ji; Jifeng Wang; Tao Pan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.