Literature DB >> 25072271

Closed-loop system in the management of diabetes: past, present, and future.

Viral N Shah1, Aaron Shoskes, Beshoy Tawfik, Satish K Garg.   

Abstract

Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) has been shown to reduce micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, IIT is associated with a significant increase in severe hypoglycemic events, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Optimization of glycemic control without hypoglycemia (especially nocturnal) should be the next major goal for subjects on insulin treatment. The use of insulin pumps along with continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) has made it easier but requires significant resources and patient education. Research is ongoing to close the loop by integrating the pump and the CGM using different algorithms. The currently available closed-loop system is the threshold suspend. Steps needed to achieve a near-perfect closed-loop are (1) a control-to-range system that will reduce the incidence and/or severity of hyper- and/or hypoglycemia by adjusting the insulin dose and (2) a control-to-target system, a fully automated or hybrid system that sets target glucose levels to individual needs and maintains glucose levels throughout the day using insulin (unihormonal) alone or with other hormones such as glucagon or possibly pramlintide (bihormonal). Future research is also focusing on better insulin delivery devices (pumps), more accurate CGMs, better predictive algorithms, and ultra-rapid-acting insulin analogs to make the closed-loop system as physiological as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25072271     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  23 in total

Review 1.  Physical Activity Capture Technology With Potential for Incorporation Into Closed-Loop Control for Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Vikash Dadlani; James A Levine; Shelly K McCrady-Spitzer; Eyal Dassau; Yogish C Kudva
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-18

Review 2.  Hypo- and Hyperglycemic Alarms: Devices and Algorithms.

Authors:  Daniel Howsmon; B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  DTT: 19 Years and Counting ….

Authors:  Satish K Garg
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  The Future of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Halis K Akturk
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Flash Glucose Monitoring: The Future Is Here.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; Halis Kaan Akturk
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Pursuit of a perfect insulin.

Authors:  Alexander N Zaykov; John P Mayer; Richard D DiMarchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Youth and parent measures of self-efficacy for continuous glucose monitoring: survey psychometric properties.

Authors:  Lisa E Rasbach; Lisa K Volkening; Jessica T Markowitz; Deborah A Butler; Michelle L Katz; Lori M B Laffel
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Neuroessentialism in Discussions About the Impact of Closed-Loop Technologies on Agency and Identity.

Authors:  Eric Racine; Ariane Quintal; Matthew Sample
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-16

9.  Psychosocial Impact of the Bionic Pancreas During Summer Camp.

Authors:  Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Danielle Hessler; William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

10.  Progress in Diabetes Technology: Developments in Insulin Pumps, Continuous Glucose Monitors, and Progress towards the Artificial Pancreas.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Bruce Buckingham; David M Maahs
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.