Literature DB >> 25072182

Preoperatively misclassified, surgically removed benign renal masses: a systematic review of surgical series and United States population level burden estimate.

David C Johnson1, Josip Vukina2, Angela B Smith3, Anne-Marie Meyer4, Stephanie B Wheeler5, Tzy-Mey Kuo6, Hung-Jui Tan7, Michael E Woods3, Mathew C Raynor2, Eric M Wallen3, Raj S Pruthi3, Matthew E Nielsen8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A significant proportion of renal masses removed for suspected malignancy are histologically benign with the probability inversely proportional to lesion size. To our knowledge the number of preoperatively misclassified benign renal masses treated with nephrectomy is currently unknown. Given the increasing incidence and decreasing average size of renal cell carcinoma, this burden is likely increasing. We estimated the population level burden of surgically removed, preoperatively misclassified benign renal masses in the United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed the literature for studies of pathological findings of renal masses removed for suspected renal cell carcinoma based on preoperative imaging through July 1, 2014. We excluded studies that did not describe benign pathology and with masses not stratified by size, and in which pathology results were based on biopsy. SEER data were queried for the incidence of surgically removed renal cell carcinomas in 2000 to 2009.
RESULTS: A total of 19 studies of tumor pathology based on size met criteria for review. Pooled estimates of the proportion of benign histology in our primary analysis (American studies only and 1 cm increments) were 40.4%, 20.9%, 19.6%, 17.2%, 9.2% and 6.4% for tumors less than 1, 1 to less than 2, 2 to less than 3, 3 to less than 4, 4 to 7 and greater than 7, respectively. The estimated number of surgically resected benign renal masses in the United States from 2000 to 2009 increased by 82% from 3,098 to 5,624.
CONCLUSIONS: These estimates suggest that the population level burden of preoperatively misclassified benign renal masses is substantial and increasing rapidly, paralleling increases in surgically resected small renal cell carcinoma. This study illustrates an important and to our knowledge previously unstudied dimension of overtreatment that is not directly quantified in contemporary surveillance data.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER program; carcinoma; diagnostic errors; kidney; neoplasms; renal cell

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25072182     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  51 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Risks of Biopsy in the Diagnosis of a Renal Mass Suspicious for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Michael H Johnson; Phillip M Pierorazio; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts tumor pathology in newly diagnosed renal tumors.

Authors:  Boyd R Viers; R Houston Thompson; Christine M Lohse; John C Cheville; Bradley C Leibovich; Stephen A Boorjian; Matthew K Tollefson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Use in Small Renal Masses.

Authors:  M Vedanayagam; B Bhattacharya; S Sriprasad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-05

4.  Mitochondrial PIWI-interacting RNAs are novel biomarkers for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chenming Zhao; Yuri Tolkach; Doris Schmidt; Marieta Toma; Michael H Muders; Glen Kristiansen; Stefan C Müller; Jörg Ellinger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Treatment approaches to small renal masses in patients of advanced age (≥75 years).

Authors:  Muhammet Fuat Özcan; Serkan Altınova; Ali Atan
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-07

Review 6.  [Innovative ultrasound-based diagnosis of renal tumors].

Authors:  K F Stock; J Slotta-Huspenina; H Kübler; M Autenrieth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

8.  Diagnostic Performance and Interreader Agreement of a Standardized MR Imaging Approach in the Prediction of Small Renal Mass Histology.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Noah E Canvasser; Yin Xi; Daniella F Pinho; Daniel N Costa; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Gaurav Khatri; John R Leyendecker; Takeshi Yokoo; Aaron H Lay; Nicholas Kavoussi; Ersin Koseoglu; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Characterizing Indeterminate Renal Masses with Molecular Imaging: the Role of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Andrew M Reynolds; Kristin Kelly Porter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Diagnostic performance of prospectively assigned clear cell Likelihood scores (ccLS) in small renal masses at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Sandy Kim; Ryan L Steinberg; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Ivan Pedrosa; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.