Literature DB >> 25072017

Cancer spending and accountable care organizations: Evidence from the Physician Group Practice Demonstration.

Carrie H Colla, Valerie A Lewis, Daniel J Gottlieb, Elliott S Fisher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although accountable care organizations (ACOs) are rapidly being deployed in Medicare, little is known about how the model might affect high-risk, high cost groups such as cancer patients. The Physician Group Practice Demonstration, which ran from 2005 to 2010 in 10 physician groups, provides the best current evidence on the likely effectiveness of accountable care organizations for Medicare beneficiaries. Changes in cancer treatment and spending under this program may be indicative of cancer treatment under ACO payment reform.
METHODS: Using Medicare fee-for-service claims data, regression analysis was used to estimate changes in payments for cancer patients using a difference-in-difference design comparing pre- (2001-2004) and post-intervention (2005-2009) trends in spending on cancer patients in PGPD participants to local control groups.
RESULTS: Regression models indicate the Physician Group Practice Demonstration was associated with average Medicare spending reductions per cancer patient of $721 annually across participating sites, an annual 3.9% reduction in payments per patient. Savings derived entirely from reductions in acute care payments for inpatient stays. The Demonstration was also associated with a reduction in mortality among cancer patients. There was no significant change in the proportion of deaths occurring in the hospital. There were significant reductions in hospice use, hospital discharges and ICU days, but no reductions in cancer-specific procedures or chemotherapy. Estimates of all measures varied considerably across participating sites.
CONCLUSIONS: The Physician Group Practice Demonstration was associated with reductions in admissions for inpatient care among beneficiaries with prevalent cancer, with no adverse effect on mortality. Participants in the Physician Group Practice Demonstration did not change the trajectory of spending for cancer-specific treatments. IMPLICATIONS: Inpatient care for beneficiaries with cancer may represent a significant source of potential savings for ACOs, but evidence from the Physician Group Practice Demonstration indicates that no changes were made to cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountable care organizations; Cancer; Medicare; Payment reform

Year:  2013        PMID: 25072017      PMCID: PMC4110916          DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  7 in total

Review 1.  HMO plan performance update: an analysis of the literature, 1997-2001.

Authors:  Robert H Miller; Harold S Luft
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Medicare program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-11-02

3.  UnitedHealthcare's bold effort to deal with cancer drug costs.

Authors:  Joseph Burns
Journal:  Manag Care       Date:  2011-01

4.  Bending the cost curve in cancer care.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Is health spending slowing down?

Authors:  H A Huskamp; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Spending differences associated with the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; David E Wennberg; Ellen Meara; Jonathan S Skinner; Daniel Gottlieb; Valerie A Lewis; Christopher M Snyder; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Medicare physician group practice demonstration design: quality and efficiency pay-for-performance.

Authors:  John Kautter; Gregory C Pope; Michael Trisolini; Sherry Grund
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2007
  7 in total
  22 in total

1.  Accountability across the Continuum: The Participation of Postacute Care Providers in Accountable Care Organizations.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Valerie A Lewis; Savannah L Bergquist; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization in the First Two Years of the Medicare Shared Savings Program Using Big Data from the CMS Enclave.

Authors:  Fabricio S P Kury; Seo H Baik; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

3.  An ED pilot intervention to facilitate outpatient acute care for cancer patients.

Authors:  Gabriel A Brooks; Eddy J Chen; Mark A Murakami; Marios Giannakis; Christopher W Baugh; Deb Schrag
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Early Accountable Care Organization Results in End-of-Life Spending Among Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Miranda B Lam; Jie Zheng; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  The Affordable Care Act and Cancer Care Delivery.

Authors:  Gabriel A Brooks; J Russell Hoverman; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Searching for the value of accountable care organizations in cancer care.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Brent K Hollenbeck; Tudor Borza
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Association Between Spending and Outcomes for Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Meng Li; Darius N Lakdawalla; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Linking Quality and Spending to Measure Value for People with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Phillip E Rodgers
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Craig E Pollack; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Xiao Xu; Nicholas A Christakis; Howard P Forman; James B Yu; Brigid K Killelea; Shi-Yi Wang; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Alternative payment and care-delivery models in oncology: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emeline M Aviki; Stephen M Schleicher; Samyukta Mullangi; Konstantina Matsoukas; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.