AIM: To describe our experience in treating rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), report morbidity and mortality and oncological outcome. METHODS: A total of 425 patients with rectal cancer (120 T1, 185 T2, 120 T3 lesions) were staged by digital rectal examination, rectoscopy, transanal endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography. Patients with T1-N0 lesions and favourable histological features underwent TEM immediately. Patients with preoperative stage T2-T3-N0 underwent preoperative high-dose radiotherapy; from 1997 those aged less than 70 years and in good general health also underwent preoperative chemotherapy. Patients with T2-T3-N0 lesions were restaged 30 d after radiotherapy and were then operated on 40-50 d after neoadjuvant therapy. The instrumentation designed by Buess was used for all procedures. RESULTS: There were neither perioperative mortality nor intraoperative complications. Conversion to other surgical procedures was never required. Major complications (urethral lesions, perianal or retroperitoneal phlegmon and rectovaginal fistula) occurred in six (1.4%) patients and minor complications (partial suture line dehiscence, stool incontinence and rectal haemorrhage) in 42 (9.9%). Postoperative pain was minimal. Definitive histological examination of the 425 malignant lesions showed 80 (18.8%) pT0, 153 (36%) pT1, 151 (35.5%) pT2, and 41 (9.6%) pT3 lesions. Eighteen (4.2%) patients (ten pT2 and eight pT3) had a local recurrence and 16 (3.8%) had distant metastasis. Cancer-specific survival rates at the end of follow-up were 100% for pT1 patients (253 mo), 93% for pT2 patients (255 mo) and 89% for pT3 patients (239 mo). CONCLUSION: TEM is a safe and effective procedure to treat rectal cancer in selected patients without evidence of nodal involvement. T2-T3 lesions require preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.
AIM: To describe our experience in treating rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), report morbidity and mortality and oncological outcome. METHODS: A total of 425 patients with rectal cancer (120 T1, 185 T2, 120 T3 lesions) were staged by digital rectal examination, rectoscopy, transanal endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography. Patients with T1-N0 lesions and favourable histological features underwent TEM immediately. Patients with preoperative stage T2-T3-N0 underwent preoperative high-dose radiotherapy; from 1997 those aged less than 70 years and in good general health also underwent preoperative chemotherapy. Patients with T2-T3-N0 lesions were restaged 30 d after radiotherapy and were then operated on 40-50 d after neoadjuvant therapy. The instrumentation designed by Buess was used for all procedures. RESULTS: There were neither perioperative mortality nor intraoperative complications. Conversion to other surgical procedures was never required. Major complications (urethral lesions, perianal or retroperitoneal phlegmon and rectovaginal fistula) occurred in six (1.4%) patients and minor complications (partial suture line dehiscence, stool incontinence and rectal haemorrhage) in 42 (9.9%). Postoperative pain was minimal. Definitive histological examination of the 425 malignant lesions showed 80 (18.8%) pT0, 153 (36%) pT1, 151 (35.5%) pT2, and 41 (9.6%) pT3 lesions. Eighteen (4.2%) patients (ten pT2 and eight pT3) had a local recurrence and 16 (3.8%) had distant metastasis. Cancer-specific survival rates at the end of follow-up were 100% for pT1patients (253 mo), 93% for pT2 patients (255 mo) and 89% for pT3patients (239 mo). CONCLUSION: TEM is a safe and effective procedure to treat rectal cancer in selected patients without evidence of nodal involvement. T2-T3 lesions require preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chemoradiotherapy; Downstaging; Local excision; Rectal cancer; Transanal endoscopic microsurgery
Authors: C J Kim; T J Yeatman; D Coppola; A Trotti; B Williams; J S Barthel; W Dinwoodie; R C Karl; J Marcet Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Krzysztof Bujko; Piotr Richter; Fraser M Smith; Wojciech Polkowski; Marek Szczepkowski; Andrzej Rutkowski; Adam Dziki; Lucyna Pietrzak; Milena Kołodziejczyk; Jerzy Kuśnierz; Tomasz Gach; Jan Kulig; Grzegorz Nawrocki; Jakub Radziszewski; Ryszard Wierzbicki; Teresa Kowalska; Wiktor Meissner; Andrzej Radkowski; Krzysztof Paprota; Marcin Polkowski; Anna Rychter Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Britt J P Hupkens; Monique Maas; Milou H Martens; Willem M L L G Deserno; Jeroen W A Leijtens; Patty J Nelemans; Frans C H Bakers; Doenja M J Lambregts; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Angelo Restivo; Luigi Zorcolo; Giuseppe D'Alia; Francesca Cocco; Andrea Cossu; Francesco Scintu; Giuseppe Casula Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-08-23 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Alexandra Koreli; George Briassoulis; Michail Sideris; Anastas Philalithis; Savvas Papagrigoriadis Journal: In Vivo Date: 2021 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Bruno Augusto Alves Martins; Marcelo de Melo Andrade Coura; Romulo Medeiros de Almeida; Natascha Mourão Moreira; João Batista de Sousa; Paulo Gonçalves de Oliveira Journal: Ann Coloproctol Date: 2017-06-30