| Literature DB >> 25070919 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to the literature, closing and opening wedge high tibial valgus osteotomies can raise or lower the patella, and diffèrent methods of patella height measurement show similarly conflicting results. Clarification of this was thought to be important because there is much literature describing morbidity secondary to patella alta or patella infera (baja). Effects on tibial slope and patellar tendon length are not well delineated and the influence of sex and age is unknown. QUESTIONS/Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25070919 PMCID: PMC4182389 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3821-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res ISSN: 0009-921X Impact factor: 4.176
Baseline demographics
| Demographic | Closing wedge osteotomy | Opening wedge osteotomy | Combined osteotomy | Total | p value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 46.5 years (5.17) | 43.9 years (8.48) | 47.5 years (5.97) | 46.0 ± 6.87 years | 0.134 |
| Mean ± SD (range) | (36–54 years) | (21–59 years) | (29–56 years) | (21–59 years) | |
| Sex | |||||
| Female | 3 (16.7) | 6 (23.1) | 7 (21.9) | 16 (21) | 0.867 |
| Male | 15 (83.3) | 20 (76.9) | 25 (87.1) | 60 (79) | |
| Side | |||||
| Left | 6 (33.3) | 11 (42.3) | 15 (46.9) | 32 (42.1) | 0.648 |
| Right | 12 (66.7) | 15 (57.7) | 17 (53.1) | 44 (57.9) | |
Previous surgery** Number | 0 | 7 (27%) | 0 | 7 (9.2%) | |
* P values are from one-way ANOVA for continuous variables and from chi-square test for categorical variables; **excluding arthroscopy.
Fig. 1The postoperative plateau-patella angle measured 22° on the radiograph. Before surgery, it was 21.6°.
Fig. 2A–B(A) Before the opening wedge osteotomy, the plateau-patella angle measured 25.6° and the Insall-Salvati index was 1.14 (63.77 ÷ 56.1). (B) After the osteotomy, the plateau-patella angle measured 20.1° and the Insall-Salvati index was 1.11 (63.79 ÷ 57.35).
Fig. 3The drawing shows the lateral closing wedge osteotomy, with wedge removed.
Fig. 4The medial opening wedge osteotomy before opening is shown in this drawing.
Fig. 5The drawing shows the combined lateral closing osteotomy with the wedge removed, with a medial opening wedge osteotomy.
Measured characteristics of the three cohorts
| Variable | Closing wedge osteotomy | Opening wedge osteotomy | Combined osteotomy (n = 32) | p value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Femorotibial angle [Mean ± SD (range)] | ||||
| Preoperative | 1.59 ± 1.37 (−1.1 to 3.4) | −0.28 ± 2.99 (−5 to 4.5) | 0.21 ± 2.38 (−7 to 3.6) | 0.0589 |
| Postoperative | 7.57 ± 2.32 (1.2–12.5) | 7.48 ± 2.34 (2.8–12) | 8.07 ± 2.14 (3.8–12.4) | 0.563 |
| Change for postoperative from preoperative | 5.87 ± 2.12 (1.6–10.2) | 7.76 ± 3.57 (1.6–14) | 7.78 ± 2.45 (4.4–13.1) | 0.0579 |
| p value** | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | |
| Patellar height [Mean ± SD (range)] | ||||
| Preoperative | 24.28 ± 3.38 (17.3–28.9) | 22.83 ± 2.95 (17.2–28.3) | 23.8 ± 3.01 (18.8–32.2) | 0.278 |
| Postoperative | 27.37 ± 4.02 (18.2–34) | 18.15 ± 3.20 (12.3–24.5) | 24.97 ± 2.85(20.3–32.7) | < 0.0001 |
| Change for postoperative from preoperative | 3.1 ± 2.29 (0.7–7.6) | −4.70 ± 2.27 (−8.6 to −0.9) | 1.17 ± 2.08 (−2.5 to 7.9) | < 0.0001 |
| p value** | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | 0.0034 | |
| Tibial slope [Mean ± SD (range)] | ||||
| Preoperative | 3.32 ± 3.15 (−3.4 to 8.5) | 5 ± 3.68 (−0.7 to 14.2) | 5.75 ± 2.87 (0.8 to 11.4) | 0.0442 |
| Postoperative | 2.27 ± 3.78 (−6.4 to 8.7) | 5.43 ± 4.32 (−2.1 to 14.7) | 4.96 ± 2.66 (−1 to 10.4) | 0.0125 |
| Change for postoperative from preoperative | −1.05 ± 2.45 (−7 to 2.1) | 0.43 ± 2.6 (−4.2 to 7.3) | −0.78 ± 1.66 (−4.4 to 2) | 0.0517 |
| p value** | 0.086 | 0.398 | 0.012 | |
| Insall-Salvati index [Mean ± SD (range)] | ||||
| Preoperative | 0.96 ± 0.19 (0.65–1.33) | 0.96 ± 0.13 (0.72–1.14) | 0.98 ± 0.15 (0.69–1.4) | 0.933 |
| Postoperative | 0.98 ± 0.22 (0.66–1.44) | 0.97 ± 0.13 (0.69–1.15) | 0.98 ± 0.15 (0.67–1.14) | 0.930 |
| Change for postoperative from preoperative | 0.02 ± 0.06 (−0.06 to 0.15) | 0.0004 ± 0.039 (0.07–0.08) | 0.005 ± 0.03 (−0.09 to 0.08) | 0.442 |
| p value** | 0.233 | −.960 | 0.404 | |
* P values for comparing the three treatment groups at the same times are from ANOVA; **p values comparing scores with time in the same treatment group are from paired analysis.
Differences in plateau-patella angle between sexes
| Parameter | Males | Females | Two-sample t-test p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patellar height mean (SD) | 24.17 (3.25) | 25.31 (3.68) | 0.0028 |
Fig. 6The plateau-patella angles before and after surgery in the three cohorts with 95% CI are shown.
Fig. 7The mean change and 95% CI for the plateau-patella angle in each the three cohorts are shown.