J A Dalton1, D L Rodger2, M Wilmore3, A J Skuse4, S Humphreys3, M Flabouris3, V L Clifton1. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; The Robinson Research Institute, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA 5112, Australia. 2. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Discipline of Anthropology and Development Studies, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. Electronic address: dianne.rodger@adelaide.edu.au. 3. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Humanities, Discipline of Media, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia. 4. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Discipline of Anthropology and Development Studies, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Usage rates for information and communication technologies (ICTs) in healthcare have been increasing in recent years, but often lag behind general usage rates for populations as a whole. Research into such differential rates of ICT use across different segments of the population has identified a number of possible causal factors that limit usage. AIM: The research investigated midwives' attitudes and experiences of ICT use to identify potential causal factors that encourage or inhibit their usage in antenatal care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews, focus groups and short surveys were conducted with midwives who provide antenatal education at an Australian metropolitan hospital. Thematic and statistical analyses were used to interpret the data. FINDINGS: Although midwives recognised the potential benefits of using ICTs to deliver pregnancy-related health information many had reservations about their use in everyday work. These reservations centred on lack of training in use of ICTs, the perceived legal risks associated with social media, potential violations of patient privacy, misdiagnosis and misunderstandings between midwife and client. CONCLUSION: Midwives face a number of barriers to effective use of ICTs in healthcare including material access, skills access, usage access and motivational access. Motivational access appears to be a key concern due to the high perception of risk associated with social media in particular. Reducing the motivational barriers through a range of interventions with midwifery staff may assist in overcoming other barriers to ICT use in antenatal care. Further research is required to determine whether these findings are generalisable to other healthcare contexts.
BACKGROUND: Usage rates for information and communication technologies (ICTs) in healthcare have been increasing in recent years, but often lag behind general usage rates for populations as a whole. Research into such differential rates of ICT use across different segments of the population has identified a number of possible causal factors that limit usage. AIM: The research investigated midwives' attitudes and experiences of ICT use to identify potential causal factors that encourage or inhibit their usage in antenatal care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews, focus groups and short surveys were conducted with midwives who provide antenatal education at an Australian metropolitan hospital. Thematic and statistical analyses were used to interpret the data. FINDINGS: Although midwives recognised the potential benefits of using ICTs to deliver pregnancy-related health information many had reservations about their use in everyday work. These reservations centred on lack of training in use of ICTs, the perceived legal risks associated with social media, potential violations of patient privacy, misdiagnosis and misunderstandings between midwife and client. CONCLUSION: Midwives face a number of barriers to effective use of ICTs in healthcare including material access, skills access, usage access and motivational access. Motivational access appears to be a key concern due to the high perception of risk associated with social media in particular. Reducing the motivational barriers through a range of interventions with midwifery staff may assist in overcoming other barriers to ICT use in antenatal care. Further research is required to determine whether these findings are generalisable to other healthcare contexts.
Authors: Julia A Dalton; Dianne Rodger; Michael Wilmore; Sal Humphreys; Andrew Skuse; Claire T Roberts; Vicki L Clifton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 3.240